11.12.2012 Views

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GOVERNMENT AID AND RELIEF IN OCCUPIED AREAS • 91<br />

But there was a furious public outcry over the killing in <strong>Japan</strong>, and<br />

this led to a jurisdictional dispute between <strong>Japan</strong> and the <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>States</strong>. The incident illuminated the real situation regarding the restricted<br />

<strong>Japan</strong>ese sovereignty under the <strong>Japan</strong>–U.S. Status-<strong>of</strong>-<br />

Forces Agreement. A <strong>Japan</strong>–U.S. joint commission was set up to<br />

discuss the issue, but it could not reach any agreement. Finally, taking<br />

hardening <strong>of</strong> <strong>Japan</strong>ese public opinion on the issue into consideration,<br />

the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> saved the situation not by making any interpretation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Japan</strong>–U.S. Status-<strong>of</strong>-Forces Agreement, but by<br />

taking a special measure <strong>of</strong> “not using jurisdiction” over this particular<br />

incident.<br />

On 18 May 1957, the prosecutor indicted Girard with charges <strong>of</strong> injury<br />

resulting in death. American people expressed resentment at this<br />

development. Girard’s elder brother filed a lawsuit to the Federal district<br />

court seeking habeas corpus for Girard. On 18 June, the Federal<br />

district court gave a decision forbidding Girard’s extradition to <strong>Japan</strong>.<br />

The <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> government appealed this court ruling. At last, on<br />

11 July 1957, the Federal Supreme Court rejected a lower court decision<br />

and approved <strong>Japan</strong>ese jurisdiction over the Gerard incident.<br />

On 26 August 1957, the Girard incident trial began at the Maebashi<br />

district court. The prosecutor demanded a five-year prison term for<br />

the accused with charges <strong>of</strong> injury resulting in death. On 19 November<br />

1957, the court handed down a sentence <strong>of</strong> three years in prison<br />

with a probation period <strong>of</strong> four years. Despite this extraordinarily<br />

light sentence, the prosecutor did not appeal this court ruling, while<br />

Girard accepted it. After the court ruling, Girard returned to the<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> with his <strong>Japan</strong>ese wife. The U.S. military forces did not<br />

make any formal compensation payment; instead, it paid only<br />

620,000 yen as consolation payment. Subsequent to this incident,<br />

U.S. military personnel committed crimes in various places in <strong>Japan</strong>.<br />

See also DEFENSE.<br />

GOVERNMENT AID AND RELIEF IN OCCUPIED AREAS<br />

(GARIOA). This term describes aid assistance that was funded by the<br />

U.S. military budget given to <strong>Japan</strong> and Germany to help both countries<br />

economically recover following the end <strong>of</strong> World War II. The<br />

aid was used to pay for emergency supplies <strong>of</strong> daily necessities such<br />

as food, clothing, and pharmaceuticals needed in occupied areas. The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!