Doing a literature review
Doing-a-literature-review.pdf?utm_content=buffer443fc&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter Doing-a-literature-review.pdf?utm_content=buffer443fc&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
Undeveloped review methods How many people here have had training in reviewing literature? Are we really “standing on the shoulders of giants”? Do you recognize these sort of unqualified statements? “Previous studies have shown that…” “It has been demonstrated that…” But how many studies? Demonstrated how? Did other studies find something else? Very few systematic reviews in management 10
Undeveloped review methods Have you read a literature that was... “...just like the essays you used to write as a [undergraduate or Masters] student? You would browse through the indexes of books and journals until you came across a paragraph that looked relevant, and copied it out. If anything you found did not fit in with the theory you were proposing, you left it out. This, more or less, constitutes the methodology of the journalistic review-an overview of primary studies which have not been identified or analysed in a systematic way“ • (Greenhalgh, 1997: 672) 11
- Page 1 and 2: Doing a literature review Prof. Dav
- Page 3 and 4: The importance of literature review
- Page 5 and 6: The importance of literature review
- Page 7 and 8: Fragmented field Hard Soft Agreemen
- Page 9: The nature of the field... ‘...ma
- Page 13 and 14: © 13Cranfield University 2013 Take
- Page 15 and 16: 15
- Page 17 and 18: Learning and change in extreme cont
- Page 19 and 20: Systematic review - all of the pape
- Page 21 and 22: Mapping the field 21
- Page 23 and 24: How to conduct a systematic AND cri
- Page 25 and 26: (P2) Transparent •follow an appro
- Page 27 and 28: (P4) Reflective • a mind-set that
- Page 29 and 30: (P6) Interesting • “The first c
- Page 31 and 32: Trap 1. - A broad unfocused questio
- Page 33 and 34: Trap 3: Lack of balance between dep
- Page 35 and 36: Trap 5. - ‘Rigidly sticking to th
- Page 37 and 38: Trap 7. - ‘using journal quality
- Page 39 and 40: Trap 9. - ‘Not showing the eviden
- Page 41: Further information • Denyer D. &
Undeveloped <strong>review</strong> methods<br />
Have you read a <strong>literature</strong> that was...<br />
“...just like the essays you used to write as a [undergraduate<br />
or Masters] student? You would browse through the indexes<br />
of books and journals until you came across a paragraph<br />
that looked relevant, and copied it out. If anything you found<br />
did not fit in with the theory you were proposing, you left it<br />
out. This, more or less, constitutes the methodology of the<br />
journalistic <strong>review</strong>-an overview of primary studies which<br />
have not been identified or analysed in a systematic way“<br />
• (Greenhalgh, 1997: 672)<br />
11
Change language