Where are we on the path to eliminate hepatitis C virus ?
Pts (%) HCV Affects Pts’ Lives Now: Indirect Economic Costs of HCV • 2010 EU National Health and Wellness Survey: HCV associated with significantly lo
In Every Country Analyzed, Treatment Is More Cost Saving Estes C, Abdel-K
- Page 2 and 3: Are we on the path
- Page 4 and 5: Control vs. Elimination vs. Eradica
- Page 6 and 7: Why HCV Is A Tractable Target For E
- Page 8 and 9: Nearly Everyone With HCV Can Now Be
- Page 10 and 11: 9
- Page 12 and 13: Viremic Infections (by Stage) Impac
- Page 14 and 15: Focusing on Cirrhosis Rapid reducti
- Page 16 and 17: Pts (%) HCV in the US: Gaps in Curr
- Page 18 and 19: HCV is not JUST a liver virus ‣Pe
- Page 22 and 23: Treating Everyone ‣Encourages tes
- Page 24 and 25: Increasing SVR >90% with increase i
- Page 26 and 27: Eliminating HCV Is Everyone’s Job
- Page 28 and 29: WHAT needs to be done? 1 • Innova
- Page 30 and 31: 29
- Page 32 and 33: Could HCV Be Eliminated Through Ant
- Page 34 and 35: Impact Of Prevention On Outcome Of
- Page 36 and 37: 35
- Page 38: 37
Pts (%)<br />
HCV Affects Pts’ Lives Now: Indirect<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Costs of HCV<br />
• 2010 EU Nati<strong>on</strong>al Health and Wellness Survey: HCV associated with<br />
significantly lo<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>r scores vs c<strong>on</strong>trols in several HRQoL domains (P < .05) [1]<br />
• 2009 US Nati<strong>on</strong>al Health and Wellness Survey: pts with HCV significantly less<br />
likely <strong>to</strong> be employed vs c<strong>on</strong>trols (P < .0001) [2]<br />
30<br />
20<br />
Pts with HCV<br />
C<strong>on</strong>trols<br />
17<br />
14<br />
19<br />
15<br />
25<br />
22<br />
10<br />
5<br />
3<br />
0<br />
Absenteeism Presenteeism Overall Work<br />
Impairment<br />
Activity<br />
Impairment<br />
1. DiB<strong>on</strong>aventura Md, et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepa<strong>to</strong>l. 2012;24:869-<br />
877. 2. DiB<strong>on</strong>aventura Md, et al. J Med Ec<strong>on</strong>. 2011;14:253-261.<br />
19
Change language