Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT
Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT
Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 1.1: Effect of simulation results on mission.<br />
# Simulation Action On-Orbit Result<br />
Prediction <strong>Performance</strong><br />
1 good launch good success<br />
2 good launch bad failure<br />
3 bad no launch good delay<br />
4 bad no launch bad delay<br />
in the fourth scenario, the simulation correctly predicts poor performance and the<br />
resulting launch delay and redesign is the appropriate action.<br />
It is interesting to note that only the first scenario results in a successful mis-<br />
sion. All other scenarios lead to failure or a delay in launch. The fourth scenario is<br />
appropriate given the conditions and may eventually lead to success as long as the<br />
simulation predictions continue to be correct after adjustments and redesign. In the<br />
second and third scenarios the simulations predict the system operation incorrectly.<br />
As a result, scenario two is a complete failure, while scenario three calls for unnec-<br />
essary redesign that may lead to scenario two upon eventual launch. The simulation<br />
prediction is therefore a single-point failure in this approach.<br />
One way to increase the chances of mission success is to ensure that the simulation<br />
predictions are always correct. Accomplishing this goal requires a large investment<br />
in modeling and analysis. Uncertainty modeling, structural optimization and robust<br />
design are all known techniques that are frequently employed to increase the accuracy<br />
of performance predictions. Uncertainty modeling involves identifying the sources of<br />
model uncertainty, quantifying them and producing bounds on performance predic-<br />
tions. Uncertainty models are combined <strong>with</strong> structural optimization in the field of<br />
robust design to find a design that meets the desired performance requirements and<br />
is insensitive to model uncertainties. However, it is well known in the field of robust<br />
control that robustness is achieved at the expense of nominal performance, and so, as<br />
a result, these tools alone may not be adequate for a system that must meet aggres-<br />
sive performance requirements under a high level of uncertainty. In this thesis, the<br />
problem of how to extend robust design techniques to ensure that stringent perfor-<br />
26