Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[85] J. W. Melody and G. W. Neat. Integrated modeling methodolog validation using the micro-precision interferometer testbed: Assessment of closed-loop performance capability. In Proccedings of the American Control Conference, volume 6, pages 3531–3536, Albuquerque, NM, June 1997. SPIE. [86] B. Mennesson and J. M. Mariotti. Array configurations for a space infrared nulling interferometer dedicated to the search for earthlike extrasolar planets. ICARUS, 128(1):202–212, July 1997. [87] D. F. Miller and J. Shim. Graident-based combined structural and control optimization. J. Guidance, 10(3):291–298, May-June 1987. [88] D. W. Miller, O. L. de Weck, and G. E. Mosier. Framework for multidisciplinary integrated modeling and analysis of space telescopes. In Torben Andersen, editor, SPIE Proceedings: Integrated Modeling of Telescopes, volume 4757, pages 1–18. SPIE, July 2002. [89] M. M. Milman, M. Salama, and M. Wette. Integrated control, structure and optical design. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, number2, pages 1448–1452. American Automatic Control Council, 1991. [90] S. K. Morrison, Ye Yinyu, C. Z. Gregory Jr., G. R. Kosut, and M. E. Regelbrugge. Integrated structural/controller optimization of large space structures. In AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Controls Conference, pages 681–688, Minneapolis, MN, 1988. AIAA. [91] M. Moshrefi-Torbati, A. J. Keane, S. J. Elliott, M. J. Brennan, and E. Rogers. Passive vibration control of a satellite boom structure by geometric optimization using genetic algorithm. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 267(4):879–892, October 2003. [92] G. E. Mosier, M. Femiano, Kong Ha, et al. An integrated modeling environment for systems-level performance analysis of the next generation space telescope. In SPIE Conference on Space Telescopes and Instruments V, volume 3356, pages 89–97, Kona, Hawaii, March 1998. SPIE. [93] J. E. Mottershead and M. I. Friswell. Mdoel updating in structural dynamics: Asurvey.Journal of Sound and Vibration, 167(2):347–375, 1993. [94] MSC.Software. MSC.NASTRAN 2004 Quick Reference Guide. MSC.Software Corporation, 2003. [95] P. B. Nair and A. J. Keane. Passive vibration suppression of flexible space structures via optimal geometric redesign. AIAA Journal, 39(7):1338–1346, 2001. [96] P. B. Nair, A. J. Keane, and R. S. Langley. Design optimization of space structures with nonperiodic geometries for vibration supression. In 232
AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials, St Louis, MO, April 12-15 1999. AIAA. AIAA-99-1260. [97] Gregory W. Neat, James W. Melody, and Boris J. Lurie. Vibration attenuation approach for spaceborne optical interferometers. In IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, volume 6, November 1998. [98] R. B. Nelson. Simplified calculations of eigenvector derivatives. AIAA Journal, 14:1201–1205, 1976. [99] Gyung-Jin Park, Woo-Jeong Hwang, and Wan-Ik Lee. Structural optimization post-process using taguchi method. JSME International Journal Series A, 37(2):166–172, 1994. [100] Gyung-Jin Park, Kwon-Hee Lee, and Wan-Ik Lee. Robust design for unconstrained optimization problems using the taguchi method. AIAA Journal, 34(5):1059–1063, 1996. [101] A. Perry. A modified conjugate gradient algorithm. Operations Research, 26(6):1073–1078, November-December 1978. Technical Note. [102] M. S. Phadke. Quality Engineering Using Robust Design. Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989. AT&T Bell Laboratoris. [103] E Sandgren and T. M. Cameron. Robust design optimization of structures through consideration of variation. Computers and Structures, 80:1605–1613, 2002. [104] P. O. M. Scokaert and D. Q. Mayne. Min-max feedback model predictive control for constrained linear systems. IEEE Transancations on Automatic Control, 43(8):1136–1142, 1998. [105] M. Shao and M. M. Colavita. Potential of long-baseline infrared interferometry for narrow-angle astrometry. Astronomy and Astophysics, 262:353–358, 1991. [106] S. Simonian. Survey of spacecraft damping measurements: Applications to electro-optic jitter problems. In The role of damping in vibration and noise control in 11th Biennial Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise, volume 5, pages 287–292, Boston, MA, September 27-30 1987. ASME. [107] G. Taguchi. Qulaity engineering (taguchi methods) for the development of electronic circuit technology. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 44(2):225–229, June 1995. [108] Inc. The MathWorks. Optimization Toolbox User’s Guide. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, 2003. 233
Page 1:
Dynamic Tailoring and Tuning for Sp
Page 4 and 5:
Acknowledgments This work was suppo
Page 6 and 7:
3.2 RPT Formulation . . . . . . . .
Page 9 and 10:
List of Figures 1-1 Timeline of Ori
Page 11 and 12:
List of Tables 1.1 Effect of simula
Page 13 and 14:
Nomenclature Abbreviations ACS atti
Page 15:
dk optimization search direction f
Page 18 and 19:
1.1 Space-Based Interferometry NASA
Page 20 and 21:
unfettered by the Earth’s atmosph
Page 22 and 23:
the SCI, both the size and flexibil
Page 24 and 25:
maybethatitbecomescertain that the
Page 26 and 27:
Table 1.1: Effect of simulation res
Page 28 and 29:
Table 1.2: Effect of simulation res
Page 30 and 31:
has been found that structural desi
Page 32 and 33:
precision telescope structure for m
Page 34 and 35:
attractive, and more conservative a
Page 36 and 37:
to solve the performance tailoring
Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 2 Performance Tailoring A c
Page 41 and 42:
ometer (SCI). In the following sect
Page 43 and 44:
The equations of motion of the unda
Page 45 and 46:
The frequency response functions fr
Page 47 and 48:
the output covariance matrix, Σz,
Page 49 and 50:
where the subscript indicates the i
Page 51 and 52:
2.3.3 Design Variables The choice o
Page 53 and 54:
and then, by inspection, the inerti
Page 55 and 56:
algorithms begin at an initial gues
Page 57 and 58:
at least locally optimal, and the s
Page 59 and 60:
initial design variable state, x =
Page 61 and 62:
and the RMS OPD is computed using E
Page 63 and 64:
# Designs 25 20 15 10 5 Accepted, b
Page 65 and 66:
does not provide information on why
Page 67 and 68:
energy is distributed almost evenly
Page 69 and 70:
also symmetric as seen in the figur
Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 3 Robust Performance Tailor
Page 73 and 74:
through careful and experienced mod
Page 75 and 76:
described above. However, one can r
Page 77 and 78:
ic, σz(�x, �p), that is depend
Page 79 and 80:
Magnitude, OPD/F x [µm/N] Magnitud
Page 81 and 82:
% Energy 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 2
Page 83 and 84:
metric to the cost function. Note,
Page 85 and 86:
tion: ∂hi (z,�x, �pi) ∂�x
Page 87 and 88:
values are chosen from their statis
Page 89 and 90:
Table 3.3: Algorithm performance: a
Page 91 and 92:
Statistical Robustness The statisti
Page 93 and 94:
Performance [µm] 1400 1200 1000 80
Page 95 and 96:
(Figure 3-6(b)). The nominal perfor
Page 97 and 98:
Norm. Cum. Var. [µm 2 ] PSD [µm 2
Page 99 and 100:
energy by mode for easy comparison.
Page 101 and 102:
Y−coordinate [m] Y−coordinate [
Page 103 and 104:
RMS performance, [µm] 400 350 300
Page 105 and 106:
The requirement chosen here is some
Page 107 and 108:
Chapter 4 Dynamic Tuning Robust Per
Page 109 and 110:
on a physical truss. Since tailorin
Page 111 and 112:
Table 4.1: Tuning parameters for SC
Page 113 and 114:
m 2 [kg] J ∗ # # time y ∗ [kg]
Page 115 and 116:
m 2 [kg] 800 700 600 500 400 300 20
Page 117 and 118:
configuration than the untuned, but
Page 119 and 120:
Norm. Cum. Var. [µm 2 ] PSD [µm 2
Page 121 and 122:
Performance Requirement [µm] 400 3
Page 123 and 124:
is considered. 4.2.1 Hardware-only
Page 125 and 126:
and added to the objective function
Page 127 and 128:
using either a decreasing step-size
Page 129 and 130:
for tailoring, but tuning parameter
Page 131 and 132:
tained by randomly choosing paramet
Page 133 and 134:
p [GPa] y ∗ [kg] Performance [µm
Page 135 and 136:
# Func. Evals Performance RMS (µm)
Page 137 and 138:
tion changes in the updated solutio
Page 139 and 140:
Data: initial iterate, p0, performa
Page 141 and 142:
the new tuning configuration is ver
Page 143 and 144:
Performing an AO tuning optimizatio
Page 145 and 146:
Uncertainty Bounds Test �y [kg] S
Page 147 and 148:
Table 4.6: Tuning results on fifty
Page 149 and 150:
eters are discussed. The optimizati
Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailor
Page 153 and 154:
MPC optimization by allowing a diff
Page 155 and 156:
where the notation yij indicates th
Page 157 and 158:
(Table 4.1), and the uncertainty pa
Page 159 and 160:
Table 5.2: Performance and design p
Page 161 and 162:
it in the worst-case uncertainty re
Page 163 and 164:
The data in Figure 5-2 indicate tha
Page 165 and 166:
configuration. The tuned configurat
Page 167 and 168:
same requirement. The effect become
Page 169 and 170:
indicating that this requirement is
Page 171 and 172:
E 2 [Pa] 7.8 7.6 7.4 7.2 7 6.8 6.6
Page 173 and 174:
than the RPT design, 155.45µm to 5
Page 175 and 176:
have a very small nominal performan
Page 177 and 178:
of these simulations fail to meet r
Page 179 and 180:
and that it is the only design meth
Page 181 and 182: Chapter 6 Focus Application: Struct
Page 183 and 184: optical path differences between th
Page 185 and 186: Table 6.1: RWA disturbance model pa
Page 187 and 188: FRF Magnitude 10 1 10 0 10 −1 10
Page 189 and 190: Y Z Z X Y (a) w (c) w Y h Z Figure
Page 191 and 192: Table 6.6: Primary mirror propertie
Page 193 and 194: OP1 STAR Z OP2 OP3 Coll 1 Coll 2 Bu
Page 195 and 196: PSD OPD14 [m 2 /Hz] CumulativeOPD14
Page 197 and 198: 6.2 Design Parameters In order to a
Page 199 and 200: 6.2.2 Tuning The tuning parameters
Page 201 and 202: complex and the normal modes analys
Page 203 and 204: does not change with the design par
Page 205 and 206: (a) (b) (c) Figure 6-11: SCI TPF PT
Page 207 and 208: Table 6.14: Performance predictions
Page 209 and 210: performance trends similar to those
Page 211 and 212: Chapter 7 Conclusions and Recommend
Page 213 and 214: a statistical robustness measure su
Page 215 and 216: and the worst-case performance is a
Page 217 and 218: - Consider uncertainty analysis too
Page 219 and 220: Appendix A Gradient-Based Optimizat
Page 221 and 222: such that the gradient direction is
Page 223 and 224: the descent direction. In some case
Page 225 and 226: Bibliography [1] Jpl planet quest w
Page 227 and 228: [24] Nightsky Systems Carl Blaurock
Page 229 and 230: [48] S. C. O. Grocott, J. P. How, a
Page 231: [74] M. Lieber. Development of ball
show all

Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?