Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[61] C. D. Jilla. A Multiobjective, Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Methodology for the Conceptual Design of Distributed Satellite Systems. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, May 2002. [62] S. S. Joshi, M. M. Milman, and J. W. Melody. Optimal passive damper placement methodology for interferometers using integrated structures/optics modeling. In AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, pages 106–113, New Orleans, LA,, Aug. 11-13 1997. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. [63] A. J. Keane. Passive vibration control via unusual geometries: The application of genetic algorithm optimization to structural design. Journal of Sound and Vibration, pages 441–453, 1995. [64] H. Kim, O. M. Querin, and G. P. Steven. On the development of structural optimisation and its relevance in engineering design. Design Studies, 23(1):85– 102, Januray 2002. [65] S. Kirkpatrick, M. P. Vecchi, and C. D. Gelatt. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220(4598):671–680, May 1983. [66] U. Kirsch. Optimum Structural Design. McGraw-Hill Inc., 1981. [67] N. D. Lagaros, M. Papadrakakis, and G. Kokossalakis. Structural optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Computers and Structures, 80:571–589, 2002. [68] R. S. Langley, N. S. Bardell, and P. M Loasby. The optimal design of nearperiodic structures to minimize vibration transmission and stress levels. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 207(5):627–646, 1997. [69] R. Laskin. Sim technology development overview - light at the end of the tunnel. In Interferometry in Space, pages 16–32, Waikoloa, HI, August 26-28 2002. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation. [70] P Lawson. The terrestrial planet finder. In Aerospace Conference, volume4, pages 2005–2011, Big Sky, MT, March 10-17 2001. IEEE. [71] A. Leger, J. M. Mariotti, B. Mennesson, M. Ollivier, J. L. Puget, D. Rouan, and J. Schneider. Could we search for primitive life on extrasolar planets in the near future? the darwin project. ICARUS, 123(2):249–255, October 1996. [72] J. Leitner, F. Bauer, R. Carpenter, M. Moreau, and J. P. How. Formation flight in space. GPS World, pages 22–31, February 2002. [73] J. P. Levia, B. P. Watson, and I. Kosaka. Modern structural optimization concepts applied to topology optimization. In 30th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, Norfolk, VA, June 28-July 1 1999. AIAA. 230
[74] M. Lieber. Development of ball integrated telescope model. In Torben Andersen, editor, Proceedings of SPIE: Integrated Modeling of Telescopes, volume 4757, pages 19–30. SPIE, July 2002. [75] M. Lieber, C. Noecker, and S. Kilston. Integrated systems modeling for evaluating the coronograph approach to planet detection. In Alfred B. Schultz and Richard G. Lyon, editors, Proceedings of SPIE: High-Contrast Imaging for Exo-Planet Detection, volume 4860, pages 108–119. SPIE, February 2003. [76] D. M. Lobosco. Integrated modeling of optical performance for the terrestrial planet finder structurally connected interferometer. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 2004. [77] B. A. Macintosh, D. Gavel, S. G. Gibbard, C. E. Max, M. Eckart, I. dePater, A. M. Ghez, and J. Spencer. Speckle imaging of volcanic hotspots on io <strong>with</strong> the keck telescope. Icarus, 165:137–143, 2003. [78] Emmanuel Manil and M. Lieber. End-to-end system modeling of the vlt. In Arne L. Ardeberg, editor, Optical Telescopes of Today and Tomorrow, volume 2871, pages 181–192. SPIE, March 1997. [79] S Manoharan and S Shanmuganathan. A comparison of search mechanicsms for structural optimization. Computers and Structures, 73:363–372, 1999. [80] J. R. R. A. Martins, P. Sturdza, and J. J. Alonso. The complex-step derivative approximation. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 29(3):245–262, September 2003. [81] B. P. Masters and E. F. Crawley. Evolutionary design of controlled structures systems. In AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit, pages 1556 – 1569, Kissimmee, FL, Apr. 7-10 1997. AIAA. AIAA-97-1263. [82] B. P. Masters and E. F. Crawley. An experimental investigation of optimized precision optical controlled-structures. In Mark E. Regelbrugge, editor, Smart Structures and Materials 1997: Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, volume 3041, pages 348–359. SPIE, June 1997. [83] R. A. Masterson, D. W. Miller, and R. L. Grogan. Development and validation of reaction wheel disturbance models: Empirical model,. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 249(3):575–598, 2002. [84] J. W. Melody and G. W. Neat. Integrated modeling methodology validation using micro-precision interferometer testbed. In Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Decision and Control, volume 4, pages 4222–4227, Kobe, Japan, December 1996. IEEE. 231
Page 1:
Dynamic Tailoring and Tuning for Sp
Page 4 and 5:
Acknowledgments This work was suppo
Page 6 and 7:
3.2 RPT Formulation . . . . . . . .
Page 9 and 10:
List of Figures 1-1 Timeline of Ori
Page 11 and 12:
List of Tables 1.1 Effect of simula
Page 13 and 14:
Nomenclature Abbreviations ACS atti
Page 15:
dk optimization search direction f
Page 18 and 19:
1.1 Space-Based Interferometry NASA
Page 20 and 21:
unfettered by the Earth’s atmosph
Page 22 and 23:
the SCI, both the size and flexibil
Page 24 and 25:
maybethatitbecomescertain that the
Page 26 and 27:
Table 1.1: Effect of simulation res
Page 28 and 29:
Table 1.2: Effect of simulation res
Page 30 and 31:
has been found that structural desi
Page 32 and 33:
precision telescope structure for m
Page 34 and 35:
attractive, and more conservative a
Page 36 and 37:
to solve the performance tailoring
Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 2 Performance Tailoring A c
Page 41 and 42:
ometer (SCI). In the following sect
Page 43 and 44:
The equations of motion of the unda
Page 45 and 46:
The frequency response functions fr
Page 47 and 48:
the output covariance matrix, Σz,
Page 49 and 50:
where the subscript indicates the i
Page 51 and 52:
2.3.3 Design Variables The choice o
Page 53 and 54:
and then, by inspection, the inerti
Page 55 and 56:
algorithms begin at an initial gues
Page 57 and 58:
at least locally optimal, and the s
Page 59 and 60:
initial design variable state, x =
Page 61 and 62:
and the RMS OPD is computed using E
Page 63 and 64:
# Designs 25 20 15 10 5 Accepted, b
Page 65 and 66:
does not provide information on why
Page 67 and 68:
energy is distributed almost evenly
Page 69 and 70:
also symmetric as seen in the figur
Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 3 Robust Performance Tailor
Page 73 and 74:
through careful and experienced mod
Page 75 and 76:
described above. However, one can r
Page 77 and 78:
ic, σz(�x, �p), that is depend
Page 79 and 80:
Magnitude, OPD/F x [µm/N] Magnitud
Page 81 and 82:
% Energy 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 2
Page 83 and 84:
metric to the cost function. Note,
Page 85 and 86:
tion: ∂hi (z,�x, �pi) ∂�x
Page 87 and 88:
values are chosen from their statis
Page 89 and 90:
Table 3.3: Algorithm performance: a
Page 91 and 92:
Statistical Robustness The statisti
Page 93 and 94:
Performance [µm] 1400 1200 1000 80
Page 95 and 96:
(Figure 3-6(b)). The nominal perfor
Page 97 and 98:
Norm. Cum. Var. [µm 2 ] PSD [µm 2
Page 99 and 100:
energy by mode for easy comparison.
Page 101 and 102:
Y−coordinate [m] Y−coordinate [
Page 103 and 104:
RMS performance, [µm] 400 350 300
Page 105 and 106:
The requirement chosen here is some
Page 107 and 108:
Chapter 4 Dynamic Tuning Robust Per
Page 109 and 110:
on a physical truss. Since tailorin
Page 111 and 112:
Table 4.1: Tuning parameters for SC
Page 113 and 114:
m 2 [kg] J ∗ # # time y ∗ [kg]
Page 115 and 116:
m 2 [kg] 800 700 600 500 400 300 20
Page 117 and 118:
configuration than the untuned, but
Page 119 and 120:
Norm. Cum. Var. [µm 2 ] PSD [µm 2
Page 121 and 122:
Performance Requirement [µm] 400 3
Page 123 and 124:
is considered. 4.2.1 Hardware-only
Page 125 and 126:
and added to the objective function
Page 127 and 128:
using either a decreasing step-size
Page 129 and 130:
for tailoring, but tuning parameter
Page 131 and 132:
tained by randomly choosing paramet
Page 133 and 134:
p [GPa] y ∗ [kg] Performance [µm
Page 135 and 136:
# Func. Evals Performance RMS (µm)
Page 137 and 138:
tion changes in the updated solutio
Page 139 and 140:
Data: initial iterate, p0, performa
Page 141 and 142:
the new tuning configuration is ver
Page 143 and 144:
Performing an AO tuning optimizatio
Page 145 and 146:
Uncertainty Bounds Test �y [kg] S
Page 147 and 148:
Table 4.6: Tuning results on fifty
Page 149 and 150:
eters are discussed. The optimizati
Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailor
Page 153 and 154:
MPC optimization by allowing a diff
Page 155 and 156:
where the notation yij indicates th
Page 157 and 158:
(Table 4.1), and the uncertainty pa
Page 159 and 160:
Table 5.2: Performance and design p
Page 161 and 162:
it in the worst-case uncertainty re
Page 163 and 164:
The data in Figure 5-2 indicate tha
Page 165 and 166:
configuration. The tuned configurat
Page 167 and 168:
same requirement. The effect become
Page 169 and 170:
indicating that this requirement is
Page 171 and 172:
E 2 [Pa] 7.8 7.6 7.4 7.2 7 6.8 6.6
Page 173 and 174:
than the RPT design, 155.45µm to 5
Page 175 and 176:
have a very small nominal performan
Page 177 and 178:
of these simulations fail to meet r
Page 179 and 180: and that it is the only design meth
Page 181 and 182: Chapter 6 Focus Application: Struct
Page 183 and 184: optical path differences between th
Page 185 and 186: Table 6.1: RWA disturbance model pa
Page 187 and 188: FRF Magnitude 10 1 10 0 10 −1 10
Page 189 and 190: Y Z Z X Y (a) w (c) w Y h Z Figure
Page 191 and 192: Table 6.6: Primary mirror propertie
Page 193 and 194: OP1 STAR Z OP2 OP3 Coll 1 Coll 2 Bu
Page 195 and 196: PSD OPD14 [m 2 /Hz] CumulativeOPD14
Page 197 and 198: 6.2 Design Parameters In order to a
Page 199 and 200: 6.2.2 Tuning The tuning parameters
Page 201 and 202: complex and the normal modes analys
Page 203 and 204: does not change with the design par
Page 205 and 206: (a) (b) (c) Figure 6-11: SCI TPF PT
Page 207 and 208: Table 6.14: Performance predictions
Page 209 and 210: performance trends similar to those
Page 211 and 212: Chapter 7 Conclusions and Recommend
Page 213 and 214: a statistical robustness measure su
Page 215 and 216: and the worst-case performance is a
Page 217 and 218: - Consider uncertainty analysis too
Page 219 and 220: Appendix A Gradient-Based Optimizat
Page 221 and 222: such that the gradient direction is
Page 223 and 224: the descent direction. In some case
Page 225 and 226: Bibliography [1] Jpl planet quest w
Page 227 and 228: [24] Nightsky Systems Carl Blaurock
Page 229: [48] S. C. O. Grocott, J. P. How, a
Page 233 and 234: AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures,
show all

Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?