Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT
Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT
Table 6.8: TPF SCI instrument elements. Element ID Element Type Description 5000 GRID 5010 CONM2 Combiner 5101 RBAR 3000 PSHELL, MAT1 Collector glass properties 10001-10085 GRID 13001 - 13060 CQUAD8 Collector 1 (X=-18m) Mirror 14001 - 14024 CTRIA6 12203 - 12206 12200 CBAR PBAR, MAT1 Collector 1 Mounts 20001-20085 GRID 23001 - 23060 CQUAD8 Collector 2 (X=-6m) Mirror 24001 - 24024 CTRIA6 22203 - 22206 22200 CBAR PBAR, MAT1 Collector 2 Mounts 30001-30085 GRID 33001 - 33060 CQUAD8 Collector 3 (X=+6m) Mirror 34001 - 34024 CTRIA6 32203 - 32206 32200 CBAR PBAR, MAT1 Collector 3 Mounts 40001-40085 GRID 43001 - 43060 CQUAD8 Collector 4 (X=+18m) Mirror 44001 - 44024 CTRIA6 42203 - 42206 42200 CBAR PBAR, MAT1 Collector 4 Mounts 192
OP1 STAR Z OP2 OP3 Coll 1 Coll 2 Bus Coll 3 Coll 4 RWA Combiner OP4 Figure 6-6: Structural model schematic showing optical paths. the combiner through each collector are all equal to B 2 X + R, where R is the distance from the star to the collector. These paths are shown in in Figure 6-6. However, if the collectors and/or combiner are perturbed from their nominal positions, the path lengths are affected as follows: OP1 = R − Z1 + Xc − X1 + B 2 OP2 = R − Z2 − Xc − X2 +2x3 + B 2 OP3 = R − Z3 + Xc − 2X2 + x3 + B 2 OP4 = R − Z4 − Xc + X4 + B 2 (6.4) (6.5) (6.6) (6.7) where Zi and Xi are the Z and X coordinates of the i th collector, and Zc and Xc are the Z and X coordinates of the combiner. The OPDs are then found by simply subtracting the relevant path lengths: OPD12 = Z2 − Z1 +2Xc − X1 + X2 − 2X3 (6.8) OPD13 = Z3 − Z1 − X1 +2X2 − X3 (6.9) OPD14 = Z4 − Z1 +2Xc − X1 − X4 (6.10) where OPDij is the optical path difference between the i th and j th collectors. Equa- tions 6.8 through 6.10 form the optical sensitivity matrix from the instrument position states to the performance metrics. 193
- Page 141 and 142: the new tuning configuration is ver
- Page 143 and 144: Performing an AO tuning optimizatio
- Page 145 and 146: Uncertainty Bounds Test �y [kg] S
- Page 147 and 148: Table 4.6: Tuning results on fifty
- Page 149 and 150: eters are discussed. The optimizati
- Page 151 and 152: Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailor
- Page 153 and 154: MPC optimization by allowing a diff
- Page 155 and 156: where the notation yij indicates th
- Page 157 and 158: (Table 4.1), and the uncertainty pa
- Page 159 and 160: Table 5.2: Performance and design p
- Page 161 and 162: it in the worst-case uncertainty re
- Page 163 and 164: The data in Figure 5-2 indicate tha
- Page 165 and 166: configuration. The tuned configurat
- Page 167 and 168: same requirement. The effect become
- Page 169 and 170: indicating that this requirement is
- Page 171 and 172: E 2 [Pa] 7.8 7.6 7.4 7.2 7 6.8 6.6
- Page 173 and 174: than the RPT design, 155.45µm to 5
- Page 175 and 176: have a very small nominal performan
- Page 177 and 178: of these simulations fail to meet r
- Page 179 and 180: and that it is the only design meth
- Page 181 and 182: Chapter 6 Focus Application: Struct
- Page 183 and 184: optical path differences between th
- Page 185 and 186: Table 6.1: RWA disturbance model pa
- Page 187 and 188: FRF Magnitude 10 1 10 0 10 −1 10
- Page 189 and 190: Y Z Z X Y (a) w (c) w Y h Z Figure
- Page 191: Table 6.6: Primary mirror propertie
- Page 195 and 196: PSD OPD14 [m 2 /Hz] CumulativeOPD14
- Page 197 and 198: 6.2 Design Parameters In order to a
- Page 199 and 200: 6.2.2 Tuning The tuning parameters
- Page 201 and 202: complex and the normal modes analys
- Page 203 and 204: does not change with the design par
- Page 205 and 206: (a) (b) (c) Figure 6-11: SCI TPF PT
- Page 207 and 208: Table 6.14: Performance predictions
- Page 209 and 210: performance trends similar to those
- Page 211 and 212: Chapter 7 Conclusions and Recommend
- Page 213 and 214: a statistical robustness measure su
- Page 215 and 216: and the worst-case performance is a
- Page 217 and 218: - Consider uncertainty analysis too
- Page 219 and 220: Appendix A Gradient-Based Optimizat
- Page 221 and 222: such that the gradient direction is
- Page 223 and 224: the descent direction. In some case
- Page 225 and 226: Bibliography [1] Jpl planet quest w
- Page 227 and 228: [24] Nightsky Systems Carl Blaurock
- Page 229 and 230: [48] S. C. O. Grocott, J. P. How, a
- Page 231 and 232: [74] M. Lieber. Development of ball
- Page 233 and 234: AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures,
OP1<br />
STAR<br />
Z<br />
OP2 OP3<br />
Coll 1 Coll 2 Bus Coll 3 Coll 4<br />
RWA<br />
Combiner<br />
OP4<br />
Figure 6-6: Structural model schematic showing optical paths.<br />
the combiner through each collector are all equal to B<br />
2<br />
X<br />
+ R, where R is the distance<br />
from the star to the collector. These paths are shown in in Figure 6-6. However, if<br />
the collectors and/or combiner are perturbed from their nominal positions, the path<br />
lengths are affected as follows:<br />
OP1 = R − Z1 + Xc − X1 + B<br />
2<br />
OP2 = R − Z2 − Xc − X2 +2x3 + B<br />
2<br />
OP3 = R − Z3 + Xc − 2X2 + x3 + B<br />
2<br />
OP4 = R − Z4 − Xc + X4 + B<br />
2<br />
(6.4)<br />
(6.5)<br />
(6.6)<br />
(6.7)<br />
where Zi and Xi are the Z and X coordinates of the i th collector, and Zc and Xc<br />
are the Z and X coordinates of the combiner. The OPDs are then found by simply<br />
subtracting the relevant path lengths:<br />
OPD12 = Z2 − Z1 +2Xc − X1 + X2 − 2X3 (6.8)<br />
OPD13 = Z3 − Z1 − X1 +2X2 − X3 (6.9)<br />
OPD14 = Z4 − Z1 +2Xc − X1 − X4 (6.10)<br />
where OPDij is the optical path difference between the i th and j th collectors. Equa-<br />
tions 6.8 through 6.10 form the optical sensitivity matrix from the instrument position<br />
states to the performance metrics.<br />
193