Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT
Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT
Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
model updating [60, 55, 12] and is addressed in a future section.<br />
Hardware <strong>Tuning</strong><br />
The hardware simulation is tuned in real time <strong>with</strong> the barrier steepest descent al-<br />
gorithm (BSD) and simulated annealing (SA). The tuning configuration from the<br />
model-only method that resulted in the best performance (in this case, nominal model<br />
tuning) is used as the starting point. The resulting tuning parameters, tuned perfor-<br />
mance and required number of hardware tests are listed in the table in Figure 4-10.<br />
Although each method resulted in a different tuning mass configuration, both suc-<br />
ceeded in bringing performance below the requirement. However, in order to achieve<br />
this goal a large number of tests, more than 2000 in the case of SA, are required.<br />
The results are shown graphically in the lower figure, Figure 4-10(b). The bar<br />
chart shows the number of function evaluations required for each method. In this<br />
example, the barrier method found a working configuration much more quickly than<br />
simulated annealing. Simulated annealing takes a long time since it is a random<br />
search and is not directed by gradient information. The lower subplot shows the<br />
performance results obtained by each algorithm. The solid line is the requirement,<br />
and the dotted lines indicates the nominal hardware performances. It is clear that<br />
both algorithms succeed in meeting the requirement.<br />
4.3 Isoperformance Updating for <strong>Tuning</strong><br />
In the previous section tuning methods ranging from those that use only the model to<br />
others that reject the model and tune directly on hardware are explored. It is shown<br />
that a trade exists between cost and reliability. The model-only methods are low-<br />
cost since only one hardware test is necessary. The tuning optimization is done using<br />
only the model and the resulting tuning parameters are then applied to the hardware.<br />
However, since these methods rely only on a model that is uncertain and consequently<br />
not exact they do not always succeed in tuning the hardware <strong>with</strong>in performance. In<br />
fact, for the hardware simulation considered, the tuned hardware performance is<br />
134