11.12.2012 Views

Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT

Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT

Chapter 5 Robust Performance Tailoring with Tuning - SSL - MIT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

model updating [60, 55, 12] and is addressed in a future section.<br />

Hardware <strong>Tuning</strong><br />

The hardware simulation is tuned in real time <strong>with</strong> the barrier steepest descent al-<br />

gorithm (BSD) and simulated annealing (SA). The tuning configuration from the<br />

model-only method that resulted in the best performance (in this case, nominal model<br />

tuning) is used as the starting point. The resulting tuning parameters, tuned perfor-<br />

mance and required number of hardware tests are listed in the table in Figure 4-10.<br />

Although each method resulted in a different tuning mass configuration, both suc-<br />

ceeded in bringing performance below the requirement. However, in order to achieve<br />

this goal a large number of tests, more than 2000 in the case of SA, are required.<br />

The results are shown graphically in the lower figure, Figure 4-10(b). The bar<br />

chart shows the number of function evaluations required for each method. In this<br />

example, the barrier method found a working configuration much more quickly than<br />

simulated annealing. Simulated annealing takes a long time since it is a random<br />

search and is not directed by gradient information. The lower subplot shows the<br />

performance results obtained by each algorithm. The solid line is the requirement,<br />

and the dotted lines indicates the nominal hardware performances. It is clear that<br />

both algorithms succeed in meeting the requirement.<br />

4.3 Isoperformance Updating for <strong>Tuning</strong><br />

In the previous section tuning methods ranging from those that use only the model to<br />

others that reject the model and tune directly on hardware are explored. It is shown<br />

that a trade exists between cost and reliability. The model-only methods are low-<br />

cost since only one hardware test is necessary. The tuning optimization is done using<br />

only the model and the resulting tuning parameters are then applied to the hardware.<br />

However, since these methods rely only on a model that is uncertain and consequently<br />

not exact they do not always succeed in tuning the hardware <strong>with</strong>in performance. In<br />

fact, for the hardware simulation considered, the tuned hardware performance is<br />

134

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!