Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
74 DENNIS J. BILLY<br />
Application One: The Meaning of ‘Goodness’<br />
It may be surprising to learn that, for Aelred, friendship<br />
“…can begin among the good, progress among the better, and be<br />
consummated among the perfect.” 32 If this is so, one may wonder<br />
if anyone can be good in a world where the effects of original<br />
sin influence human activity so strongly. Aelred, however,<br />
draws a strong distinction between goodness as it exists in God<br />
and in one who is journeying to God. God, in Aelred’s mind, is<br />
“…supremely powerful and supremely good, is sufficient good<br />
unto himself, since his good, his joy, his glory, his happiness, is<br />
himself.” 33 In God, there is no distinction between good, better,<br />
and best. His goodness is his perfection – and vice versa. Man,<br />
by way of contrast, is on a journey that hopefully involves a<br />
movement along a distinct series of grades of spiritual and<br />
moral perfection.<br />
When Aelred says that spiritual friendship begins with the<br />
good, he does not mean that two people must be good in the<br />
same way that God is good. Nor does he mean that they are good<br />
in the same sense as those who have already passed through<br />
death and experience God in an immediate way in the beatific<br />
vision. Nor does he mean that they have no experience of concupiscence<br />
in their lives as a result of the effects of original sin.<br />
He merely intends to say that spiritual friendships in this life are<br />
forged by those who struggle to move further along (as opposed<br />
to away from) the journey of eventual intimacy with God. In answer<br />
to a question by Gratian about friendship among those<br />
who are not good, Aelred says:<br />
I am not cutting “good” so finely as do some who call no one<br />
“good” unless he is lacking no whit in perfection. We call a man<br />
“good” who, according to the limits of our mortality, “living soberly<br />
and justly and godly in this world,” is resolved neither to ask others<br />
to do wrong nor to do wrong himself at another’s request.<br />
32 DSA 2:38 [CCCM 1:309(252-53); SF 78-79].<br />
33 DSA 1:51 [CCCM 1:297(290-91); SF 62].