11.12.2012 Views

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE WAR ON TERRORISM: A JUSTWAR? 55<br />

tion of the JWD is not only a matter of justice, and the assessment<br />

of proportionality is not to be made by a mere quantitative<br />

calculation of numbers of losses. The just war tradition, within<br />

the Catholic tradition, did not manifest any substantial development<br />

after this period, until the Second Vatican Council, with its<br />

requirement to “to undertake an evaluation of war with an<br />

entirely new attitude.” 57 The process of re-evaluation is now taking<br />

place.<br />

As the secular version of the JWD divided from the Catholic<br />

tradition, the theological-eschatological context was set aside in<br />

favour of “reason.” The link with the ethic of charity, although<br />

retained by Grotius, soon disappeared, 58 and with it any consideration<br />

of the virtues of the subject, while the assessment of the<br />

acceptable losses of non-combatants was calculated in purely<br />

“objective” terms.<br />

What would be the role and significance of the consideration<br />

of the charity in ethical decisions regarding war and the<br />

acceptable range of losses of non-combatants? Renick argues<br />

that charity would require the protagonists to do more “… than<br />

merely create a greater sum of good than evil. We must minimize<br />

the evil done, and we must be willing to sacrifice to do so,<br />

if we are meaningfully to call our actions moral.” 59 But one<br />

might ask, what is the criterion by which the minimum ought to<br />

be set? Would we want to say that, in a military action, only that<br />

number of losses may be accepted, which is strictly necessary<br />

for the success of this particular attack, and, overall, only that<br />

number of losses is acceptable which is strictly necessary for victory?<br />

But what does “necessary” mean? Does it mean what is<br />

necessary for the fitting punishment of the aggressor? Or does it<br />

mean what is required to re-establish peace, or to make the<br />

world a better place? Or does it simply mean that which is strictly<br />

necessary only to repel the aggression?<br />

The argument put forward here will be that, for Catholics, at<br />

least, and perhaps also for other Christians, the JWD has mean-<br />

57 Gaudium et Spes # 80.<br />

58 RENICK, “Charity Lost,” 455.<br />

59 RENICK, “Charity Lost,” 460-461.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!