Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE WAR ON TERRORISM: A JUSTWAR? 55<br />
tion of the JWD is not only a matter of justice, and the assessment<br />
of proportionality is not to be made by a mere quantitative<br />
calculation of numbers of losses. The just war tradition, within<br />
the Catholic tradition, did not manifest any substantial development<br />
after this period, until the Second Vatican Council, with its<br />
requirement to “to undertake an evaluation of war with an<br />
entirely new attitude.” 57 The process of re-evaluation is now taking<br />
place.<br />
As the secular version of the JWD divided from the Catholic<br />
tradition, the theological-eschatological context was set aside in<br />
favour of “reason.” The link with the ethic of charity, although<br />
retained by Grotius, soon disappeared, 58 and with it any consideration<br />
of the virtues of the subject, while the assessment of the<br />
acceptable losses of non-combatants was calculated in purely<br />
“objective” terms.<br />
What would be the role and significance of the consideration<br />
of the charity in ethical decisions regarding war and the<br />
acceptable range of losses of non-combatants? Renick argues<br />
that charity would require the protagonists to do more “… than<br />
merely create a greater sum of good than evil. We must minimize<br />
the evil done, and we must be willing to sacrifice to do so,<br />
if we are meaningfully to call our actions moral.” 59 But one<br />
might ask, what is the criterion by which the minimum ought to<br />
be set? Would we want to say that, in a military action, only that<br />
number of losses may be accepted, which is strictly necessary<br />
for the success of this particular attack, and, overall, only that<br />
number of losses is acceptable which is strictly necessary for victory?<br />
But what does “necessary” mean? Does it mean what is<br />
necessary for the fitting punishment of the aggressor? Or does it<br />
mean what is required to re-establish peace, or to make the<br />
world a better place? Or does it simply mean that which is strictly<br />
necessary only to repel the aggression?<br />
The argument put forward here will be that, for Catholics, at<br />
least, and perhaps also for other Christians, the JWD has mean-<br />
57 Gaudium et Spes # 80.<br />
58 RENICK, “Charity Lost,” 455.<br />
59 RENICK, “Charity Lost,” 460-461.