11.12.2012 Views

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE WAR ON TERRORISM: A JUSTWAR? 53<br />

the light of the evidence which has been presented here, a definitive<br />

rejection of the doctrine is not required of one who is committed<br />

to the Catholic tradition. It is, as the moral theologians of<br />

the past would have said, a “probable” position, that is to say,<br />

there are reasonable grounds for accepting it as a norm for practice.<br />

As was indicated previously, a particularly contentious element<br />

of the JWD is the rule of proportionality; this can best be<br />

dealt with in relation to the question of the immunity of the<br />

innocent in war. St. Augustine does not deal with the question<br />

explicitly. He urged the Roman general Boniface, “And so, even<br />

in the act of waging war be careful to maintain a peaceful disposition<br />

so that by defeating your foes you can bring them to the<br />

benefits of peace… And so, let it be because of necessity rather<br />

than your own desire that you kill the enemy fighting against<br />

you.” 51 It was not sufficient that Augustine’s Christian warrior<br />

preserve an interior disposition and then simply engage in whatever<br />

degree of violence was judged to be necessary. The action<br />

needed to be tempered by the aim of bringing the adversaries to<br />

peace, which could, presumably, not be done by slaughtering the<br />

innocent wholesale. There is, at least, an intimation that the<br />

virtues, and in particular charity, would set limits to the employment<br />

of justified force.<br />

Nor does St. Thomas raise the matter, although an argument<br />

for the immunity of the innocent can be constructed from his<br />

texts. The clear assertion of the prohibition to kill the innocent,<br />

specified as noncombatants, is now accepted as a constitutive<br />

element of the tradition, but it came to be acknowledged as such<br />

through a lengthy and complex process. 52 We must read St.<br />

Thomas brief articles on war in the context of his theologicalmoral<br />

vision; the people to whom he is providing moral guidance<br />

are the same ones whom he has sought to make aware of<br />

51 Letter 189.6 (CSEL 57.135). Translation from Swift, Early Fathers,<br />

114. Cf. JOHN LANGAN, S.J. “The Elements of St. Augustine’s Just War Theory,”<br />

The Journal of Religious Ethics 12 (1984) 30.<br />

52 B. JOHNSTONE, “Noncombatant Immunity: The Origins of the Principle<br />

in Theology and Law,” <strong>Studia</strong> <strong>Moralia</strong> 24/1 (1986) 120.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!