11.12.2012 Views

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

234 JOSEPH CHAPEL<br />

heart of sin. Ebner argues that one is not good or evil in relation<br />

to oneself, but only in relation to another. Therefore, sin is not<br />

an “idea” but is concretely an issue of broken relation, of turning<br />

from authentic I-thou dialogue with God and neighbor. This<br />

has been the heart of the Fall from the beginning: in trying to be<br />

absolutely “free” in the sense of absolute independence, man<br />

turns away for the other, avoiding the Thou. In trying to be more<br />

free and independent, man ends up less so.<br />

The understanding that God’s word can be expressed in<br />

some fashion in human language, as the Holy Father notes,<br />

points up the importance of philosophy for moral theology’s<br />

treatment of, “moral law, conscience, freedom, personal responsibility<br />

and guilt, which are in part defined by philosophical<br />

ethics.” 74 All of these are mediated in language and the path back<br />

to God in the moral sphere is through the word. In Ebner’s<br />

terms, because every aspect of spiritual life, including sin, has a<br />

direct relationship to the word, because all life is created<br />

through the word: “All being, which has fallen from God and has<br />

become wordless, is destined to return again to the word – in<br />

man and through him.” 75<br />

Thus the moral core for Ebner is this: we are created in the<br />

Word, God calls to us in love, and we are free to respond to that<br />

love or not. Our choice to respond or not respond is a moral<br />

stance toward relationship with God and others, or toward a retreat<br />

into self. This is a freedom that can be misused. There is an<br />

ethical or “responsible” dimension in the fact that unlike animals,<br />

we speak: speaking orients us toward the thou; we do not<br />

speak as isolated individuals but within relationships and we are<br />

“good” or “bad” within relationships, which of itself suggests our<br />

human orientation not to solitary isolation, but to communal<br />

life.<br />

In considering the relationship between faith and reason<br />

and the need for a revitalized dialogue in which philosophy will<br />

once again assist theology in discovering the proper place of<br />

faith in understanding our very existence, this article has not at-<br />

74 FR, 66.<br />

75 GREEN, 266; WR, Schriften 1:320.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!