Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DIALOGICAL PERSONALISM REVISITED 233<br />
– the very meaning of “responsibility” – suggests a fundamental<br />
moral dimension in our dialogical relationships with God and<br />
neighbor.<br />
The fact of “having the word,” makes man free. Animals do<br />
not speak and consequently do not possess reason with its capacity<br />
for abstraction, for stepping back to a “distance of perspective,”<br />
to make choices rather than respond to instinct. The<br />
fact that man speaks, as Ebner makes clear, is the manifestation<br />
of reason, of abstract thought, of perspective and of choice. Because<br />
man chooses, man is free. In the word, Jesus Christ, the<br />
Word made flesh, makes man free – a foundational condition of<br />
moral life.<br />
But man can hide from such freedom and retreat into a<br />
world of monologue and ideas. Where there is fragmentation of<br />
knowledge, as John Paul II notes, the sense that meaning can no<br />
longer be sought or found may lead to, “a kind of ambiguous<br />
thinking which leads it to an ever deepening introversion, locked<br />
within the confines of its own immanence without reference of<br />
any kind to the transcendent.” 70 In such a framework, there is no<br />
longer a basis for “moral” decisions, which are replaced by institutional<br />
or “pragmatic” considerations, by which the Holy Father<br />
explains, “anthropology itself is severely compromised by a<br />
one-dimensional vision of the human being, a vision which excludes<br />
the great ethical dilemmas and the existential analyses of<br />
the meaning of suffering and sacrifice, of life and death.” 71 The<br />
result is a kind of solitary nihilism in which, “the neglect of being<br />
inevitably leads to losing touch with objective truth and<br />
therefore with the very ground of human dignity.” 72 This in turn<br />
brings a loss of the sense that man and woman are made in the<br />
image and likeness of God, and leads, “little by little either to a<br />
destructive will to power or to a solitude without hope.” 73<br />
This “solitude without hope” is the very “I-aloneness” of<br />
which Ebner spoke, an “introversion” which hides from dialogue<br />
and encounter, a “closure to the thou” which is the very<br />
70 FR, 81.<br />
71 FR, 89.<br />
72 FR, 90.<br />
73 FR, 90.