11.12.2012 Views

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DIALOGICAL PERSONALISM REVISITED 233<br />

– the very meaning of “responsibility” – suggests a fundamental<br />

moral dimension in our dialogical relationships with God and<br />

neighbor.<br />

The fact of “having the word,” makes man free. Animals do<br />

not speak and consequently do not possess reason with its capacity<br />

for abstraction, for stepping back to a “distance of perspective,”<br />

to make choices rather than respond to instinct. The<br />

fact that man speaks, as Ebner makes clear, is the manifestation<br />

of reason, of abstract thought, of perspective and of choice. Because<br />

man chooses, man is free. In the word, Jesus Christ, the<br />

Word made flesh, makes man free – a foundational condition of<br />

moral life.<br />

But man can hide from such freedom and retreat into a<br />

world of monologue and ideas. Where there is fragmentation of<br />

knowledge, as John Paul II notes, the sense that meaning can no<br />

longer be sought or found may lead to, “a kind of ambiguous<br />

thinking which leads it to an ever deepening introversion, locked<br />

within the confines of its own immanence without reference of<br />

any kind to the transcendent.” 70 In such a framework, there is no<br />

longer a basis for “moral” decisions, which are replaced by institutional<br />

or “pragmatic” considerations, by which the Holy Father<br />

explains, “anthropology itself is severely compromised by a<br />

one-dimensional vision of the human being, a vision which excludes<br />

the great ethical dilemmas and the existential analyses of<br />

the meaning of suffering and sacrifice, of life and death.” 71 The<br />

result is a kind of solitary nihilism in which, “the neglect of being<br />

inevitably leads to losing touch with objective truth and<br />

therefore with the very ground of human dignity.” 72 This in turn<br />

brings a loss of the sense that man and woman are made in the<br />

image and likeness of God, and leads, “little by little either to a<br />

destructive will to power or to a solitude without hope.” 73<br />

This “solitude without hope” is the very “I-aloneness” of<br />

which Ebner spoke, an “introversion” which hides from dialogue<br />

and encounter, a “closure to the thou” which is the very<br />

70 FR, 81.<br />

71 FR, 89.<br />

72 FR, 90.<br />

73 FR, 90.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!