Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
228 JOSEPH CHAPEL<br />
relations. Here, Ebner breaks some new ground. He accepts the<br />
view of the eighteenth century Sturm und Drang philosopher, Johann<br />
Georg Hamann, that logos is reason, and thus to be human<br />
is to speak. 52 Language philosophers take up this theme as well,<br />
trying to explain the workings of language in human interaction,<br />
but Ebner asks instead: why, and from where, does man have the<br />
word?<br />
This is Ebner at his most original and his key contribution<br />
to this study: God spoke creation into existence, for His Word is<br />
action. Man’s “forgetfulness” of God in the Fall and his concomitant<br />
“dream of the spirit” are remedied in the same creative<br />
Word, who was in the beginning and is God. Jesus, the Word<br />
made Flesh, is God’s self-revelation as eternal Thou, the Word<br />
spoken to man to “re-awaken” him from his “dream of the spirit,”<br />
from his state of I-aloneness (Icheinsamkeit) which is isolation<br />
and monologue. The Word breaks through such that man<br />
discovers the Other, the eternal Thou, and in so discovering, his<br />
isolation ends; monologue becomes dialogue in man’s discovery<br />
of his own “I” necessarily reflected by the discovery of the Thou.<br />
In the same discovery, man’s relation with human “thous” is redefined<br />
by the very same Word.<br />
For Ebner, while the word is clearly foundational for human<br />
identity, the question of how language operates as such remains<br />
pending. The relationships between word and language and between<br />
word and sacrament provide fruitful avenues for study in<br />
dialogue with language philosophy and sacramental theology.<br />
Implications<br />
Having examined the thought of Ferdinand Ebner in some<br />
detail, it is worthwhile to briefly highlight a few ways in which<br />
52 The Sturm und Drang (Storm and Stress) movement of 1770’s Germany<br />
<strong>propos</strong>ed that for life to be meaningful, it had to be lived with one’s<br />
full energies applied to religion, poetry and discourse, at the same time embracing<br />
nature, feelings and mystery. The movement has echoes in later<br />
19th century romanticism and 20th century existential and language<br />
philosophies.