Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DIALOGICAL PERSONALISM REVISITED 211<br />
in the third person, is emblematic of Buber’s thought in I and<br />
Thou, an insight he owes directly to Ferdinand Ebner. Although<br />
Buber himself maintained that he encountered Ebner’s work,<br />
“too late to affect my own thought,” 13 his dependence on Ebner<br />
for this key insight has now been well documented. 14 Because<br />
Buber’s name is practically synonymous with I-Thou thought,<br />
what would merely be an historic footnote is significant here because<br />
it demonstrates the decisive influence of the lesser known<br />
Ferdinand Ebner as foundational and decisive to any understanding<br />
of dialogical philosophy.<br />
Ferdinand Ebner: Dialogical Personalism<br />
While the carnage of World War I caused Ferdinand Ebner<br />
13 RIVKA HORWITZ, “Ferdinand Ebner as a Source of Martin Buber’s Dialogic<br />
Thought in I and Thou,” in Martin Buber: A Centenary Volume, eds.<br />
Haim Gordon and Jochanan Bloch (New York: KTAV, 1984), 122.<br />
14 See HORWITZ, “Ferdinand Ebner,” 123: the concept of God as “the eternal<br />
Thou” or “the absolute Thou” appears in Buber for the first time in early<br />
1922, in a series of lectures entitled, Religion as Presence, delivered just as<br />
Buber was reading Ebner. In these lectures Ebner’s influence is very clear,<br />
but became less obvious later for, “a few months later, when composing the<br />
lectures into a book, Buber took out the concepts closest to Ebner’s, so that<br />
they are less evident in I and Thou.” In HORWITZ’S judgment, “Buber received<br />
the concept of divinity as developed in I and Thou from Ebner. On every page<br />
of the book, Ebner recognizes God as the ‘true Thou’ who cannot be God in<br />
the third person; but this is one of the decisive innovations of I and Thou,<br />
that God can never be grasped in the third person, but only in presence. The<br />
similarity exists not only in the substance of the concept, but also in the<br />
whole structure and development of the idea… ‘Thou’ as the basic and fixed<br />
name of God is found in Buber’s writings only after his encounter with the<br />
writings of Ebner.” See also RIVKA HORWITZ, Buber’s Way to I and Thou: An<br />
Historical Analysis and the First Publication of Martin Buber’s Lectures Religion<br />
As Presence, (Heidelberg: 1978). See also JOHN OESTERREICHER, The Unfinished<br />
Dialogue: Martin Buber and the Christian Way, (Secaucus, NJ: Citadel<br />
Press, 1987), 31.: “Rivka Horwitz has pointed to Ferdinand Ebner as the<br />
source of Buber’s own dialogic thought, particularly the postulate that God<br />
must be addressed not as the remote ‘He,’ but as the ever present ‘Thou.’ In<br />
my opinion, Ebner and Rosenzweig even outrank Buber.”