11.12.2012 Views

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE BASIC GOODS THEORY AND REVISIONISM 203<br />

sources of moral knowledge (reason, experience, and Scripture)<br />

and the hermeneutic of those sources impact their perception of<br />

Tradition and tradition as well. Methodology is a dialectical<br />

process of creating a synthetic whole out of the various sources<br />

of moral knowledge. As a theological ethic, the BGT has a clear<br />

hierarchy of the sources of moral knowledge. Tradition, specifically<br />

the magisterium as the teaching authority in the Church on<br />

faith and morals, is at the pinnacle of this hierarchy and functions<br />

as a hermeneutical lens for its interpretation of revelation<br />

and human experience. For revisionism, while recognizing the<br />

preeminence of the magisterium as a source of moral knowledge,<br />

it must be evaluated in its teaching capacity on moral issues<br />

in light of all the other sources of moral knowledge. The<br />

theological justification for revisionism’s perspective lies in Tradition<br />

and the fundamental shift in ecclesiology at Vatican II<br />

from a hierarchical model to a communio model.<br />

Throughout the history of Christianity, polarity has been an<br />

essential dimension of Catholic moral discourse. 101 It is necessary<br />

to recognize the polarity in ethical discourse and the<br />

methodological sources that are at the root of it in order to open<br />

up possible lines of discourse for discovering common ground<br />

between the two theories. While this paper has attempted to<br />

shed light on the former issue, the prospects for discovering<br />

common ground between the two theories requires further investigation.<br />

102<br />

TODD A. SALZMANN<br />

100 See RAPHAEL GALLAGHER on his discussion of polarity in moral theology<br />

since Vatican II (“Change and Continuity in the Human Condition: The<br />

Implications of GS paras. 4-10 for Moral Theology,” <strong>Studia</strong> <strong>Moralia</strong> 35 (1997)<br />

49-69, at 63-66).<br />

101 I would like to thank my colleague at Creighton University, DR. JULIA<br />

FLEMING and DR. ROBERT J. CAIN and MRS. BARBARA CAIN, as well as the anonymous<br />

reader from <strong>Studia</strong> <strong>Moralia</strong> for their comments and suggestions in reviewing<br />

this manuscript. I am also indebted to the Summer Faculty Development<br />

Grant provided by Creighton University Graduate School for its generous<br />

financial support to facilitate the completion of this article.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!