Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE BASIC GOODS THEORY AND REVISIONISM 203<br />
sources of moral knowledge (reason, experience, and Scripture)<br />
and the hermeneutic of those sources impact their perception of<br />
Tradition and tradition as well. Methodology is a dialectical<br />
process of creating a synthetic whole out of the various sources<br />
of moral knowledge. As a theological ethic, the BGT has a clear<br />
hierarchy of the sources of moral knowledge. Tradition, specifically<br />
the magisterium as the teaching authority in the Church on<br />
faith and morals, is at the pinnacle of this hierarchy and functions<br />
as a hermeneutical lens for its interpretation of revelation<br />
and human experience. For revisionism, while recognizing the<br />
preeminence of the magisterium as a source of moral knowledge,<br />
it must be evaluated in its teaching capacity on moral issues<br />
in light of all the other sources of moral knowledge. The<br />
theological justification for revisionism’s perspective lies in Tradition<br />
and the fundamental shift in ecclesiology at Vatican II<br />
from a hierarchical model to a communio model.<br />
Throughout the history of Christianity, polarity has been an<br />
essential dimension of Catholic moral discourse. 101 It is necessary<br />
to recognize the polarity in ethical discourse and the<br />
methodological sources that are at the root of it in order to open<br />
up possible lines of discourse for discovering common ground<br />
between the two theories. While this paper has attempted to<br />
shed light on the former issue, the prospects for discovering<br />
common ground between the two theories requires further investigation.<br />
102<br />
TODD A. SALZMANN<br />
100 See RAPHAEL GALLAGHER on his discussion of polarity in moral theology<br />
since Vatican II (“Change and Continuity in the Human Condition: The<br />
Implications of GS paras. 4-10 for Moral Theology,” <strong>Studia</strong> <strong>Moralia</strong> 35 (1997)<br />
49-69, at 63-66).<br />
101 I would like to thank my colleague at Creighton University, DR. JULIA<br />
FLEMING and DR. ROBERT J. CAIN and MRS. BARBARA CAIN, as well as the anonymous<br />
reader from <strong>Studia</strong> <strong>Moralia</strong> for their comments and suggestions in reviewing<br />
this manuscript. I am also indebted to the Summer Faculty Development<br />
Grant provided by Creighton University Graduate School for its generous<br />
financial support to facilitate the completion of this article.