Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
184 TODD A. SALZMAN<br />
cannot err in matters of belief, 47 discerning the implications of<br />
that belief for moral teaching is an ongoing process. The Church<br />
has erred in moral matters in the past. However, the Church as<br />
a pilgrim Church in the process of becoming provides hope that<br />
error will not persist in the long term.<br />
Fifth, revisionism would contrast the ecclesiology developed<br />
by the BGT and their reliance upon Humani Generis and Lumen<br />
Gentium 25, with that developed elsewhere in Lumen Gentium<br />
and other Vatican II documents. For example, Gaudium et Spes<br />
reflects a communion ecclesiology:<br />
With the help of the Holy Spirit, it is the task of the entire People<br />
of God, especially pastors and theologians, to hear, distinguish,<br />
and interpret the many voices of our age, and to judge them in the<br />
light of the divine Word. In this way, revealed truth can always be<br />
more deeply penetrated, better understood, and set forth to greater<br />
advantage. 48<br />
One might ask how such ecclesiological models at variance<br />
with one another could evolve from the same Council? Not only<br />
does the hermeneutical lens determine one’s interpretation of these<br />
documents, but also, as MCCORMICK notes, “it is a known and acknowledged<br />
fact that the documents of Vatican II contain perspectives<br />
and statements that are ill at ease with each other.” 49 In revisionism’s<br />
ecclesiology, legitimate and respectful dissent is a part of<br />
the dialogical model between theologians and the magisterium. It<br />
is not a cancer to be eliminated but a service to the Church in her<br />
ongoing journey to discern how we respond to complex moral<br />
questions through an ongoing reflection on Revelation.<br />
Finally, while the BGT would strictly limit those issues that<br />
are open to discussion between theologians and the magisterium,<br />
revisionism would maintain that all noninfallible magisterial<br />
pronouncements are open to scholarly investigation.<br />
The revisionist dialogical model is based on the two components<br />
of dialogue itself, listening and speaking. For theologians,<br />
47 Lumen Gentium par. 12.<br />
48 Gaudium et Spes par. 44.<br />
49 MCCORMICK, Critical Calling 103.