11.12.2012 Views

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE BASIC GOODS THEORY AND REVISIONISM 183<br />

conscience 42 and to ignore history. First, Christian tradition has<br />

consistently defended the authority of conscience in moral matters.<br />

AQUINAS writes regarding the application of knowledge to<br />

action, “conscience is said to bind by force of the divine precept.”<br />

43 That is, as long as one acts according to one’s well<br />

formed and informed conscience, even in the case of invincible<br />

ignorance and an erroneous judgment of conscience, that conscience<br />

maintains its dignity. 44 While it certainly is the case that<br />

one who informs one’s conscience according to the noninfallible<br />

authoritative teachings of the magisterium is not morally culpable<br />

if this teaching is erroneous, it does not follow that, given serious<br />

reasons that conflict with the claims of those teachings,<br />

one who acts against them is morally culpable. Revisionists argue<br />

that while there is always a strong presumption of truth in<br />

favor of magisterial teaching, if there are serious reasons for<br />

questioning that teaching, one can indeed knowingly and willingly<br />

act against such a teaching on the authority of conscience.<br />

One only need look at the history of the Church to see that, especially<br />

in questions of morals, the magisterium has erred on<br />

noninfallible judgments, even grievously. 45 POPE JOHN PAUL II’s recent<br />

acknowledgement of the sins of the sons of the Church<br />

would seen to attest to this fact. 46 If individual Christians err, including<br />

those acting in a magisterial capacity, it is proof not of<br />

the limits of the Holy Spirit but of the limits of human beings to<br />

respond faithfully to the Spirit. All human beings, including<br />

members of the magisterium, are subject to sin and its impact<br />

on the discernment of truth. And while the Church as a whole<br />

42 Code of Canon Law c. 752 and the commentary 548.<br />

43<br />

AQUINAS, De Veritate, q. 17, a. 3. See JOHN MAHONEY, The Making of<br />

Moral Theology: A Study of the Roman Catholic Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon<br />

Press, 1987) 192.<br />

44<br />

POPE JOHN PAUL II, Veritatis Splendor par. 62; and The Universal Catechism<br />

of the Catholic Church (Rome: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1994) par.<br />

1793.<br />

45<br />

NOONAN, “Development in Moral Doctrine”.<br />

46<br />

JOHN PAUL II, “Jubilee Characteristic: The Purification of Memory,”<br />

Origins 29/40 (March 23, 2000) 648-50. See also, INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL<br />

COMMISSION, “Memory and Reconciliation: The Church and Faults of the<br />

Past,” Origins 29/39 (March 16, 2000) 626-44.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!