11.12.2012 Views

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

176 TODD A. SALZMAN<br />

member superior to the other, so too, the three bodies which<br />

constitute the Church. 14 While this model does not deny the importance<br />

and authority of the magisterium as an authoritative<br />

witness to truth, it stands in relation to, not above, the other two<br />

bodies. The relationship between the magisterium, theologians<br />

and the people of God are communal and dialectical. It is communal<br />

in the sense that all the faithful share a common baptism<br />

that unites them in faith. On the basis of this faith, the faithful<br />

“cannot err in matters of belief.” 15 Given this communal unity,<br />

however, there remain different gifts and roles in discovering,<br />

articulating, and defining “matters of belief.” For the faithful, experience<br />

in their faith journey as this is lived out and manifested<br />

in community is key to determining what constitutes matters<br />

of belief. For moral theologians, it is reflection on that experience<br />

as well as upon revelation and reason that help to formulate<br />

and articulate matters of belief in a comprehensive ethical<br />

system. For the magisterium, it is discernment that both listens<br />

to the experiences of the faithful and is in thoughtful, honest,<br />

and respectful dialogue with theologians in the process of formulating<br />

matters of belief and to teach authoritatively. In all of<br />

these processes, the Holy Spirit is present to guide the entire<br />

church. Whenever there is a disagreement over noninfallible<br />

magisterial teachings, whether it be the faithful in relation to the<br />

magisterium, theologians in relation to the magisterium, or the<br />

magisterium in relation to the faithful and theologians, such disagreements<br />

must be thoroughly investigated to discern their<br />

source, their validity, and if and how it challenges those teachings.<br />

Mere disagreement does not constitute an argument<br />

against noninfallible teachings. What it does warrant is a serious<br />

investigation that can seek to clarify, correct, or in extreme cases<br />

change those teachings on the basis of responsible dialogue.<br />

The only teachings that are beyond correction and change are<br />

infallible teachings.<br />

Both of these ecclesiological models are evident in the early<br />

14 See RICHARD R. GAILLARDETZ, Teaching with Authority: A Theology of the<br />

Magisterium of the Church (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1997) 241-52.<br />

15 Lumen Gentium par. 12.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!