Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Avant-propos - Studia Moralia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
176 TODD A. SALZMAN<br />
member superior to the other, so too, the three bodies which<br />
constitute the Church. 14 While this model does not deny the importance<br />
and authority of the magisterium as an authoritative<br />
witness to truth, it stands in relation to, not above, the other two<br />
bodies. The relationship between the magisterium, theologians<br />
and the people of God are communal and dialectical. It is communal<br />
in the sense that all the faithful share a common baptism<br />
that unites them in faith. On the basis of this faith, the faithful<br />
“cannot err in matters of belief.” 15 Given this communal unity,<br />
however, there remain different gifts and roles in discovering,<br />
articulating, and defining “matters of belief.” For the faithful, experience<br />
in their faith journey as this is lived out and manifested<br />
in community is key to determining what constitutes matters<br />
of belief. For moral theologians, it is reflection on that experience<br />
as well as upon revelation and reason that help to formulate<br />
and articulate matters of belief in a comprehensive ethical<br />
system. For the magisterium, it is discernment that both listens<br />
to the experiences of the faithful and is in thoughtful, honest,<br />
and respectful dialogue with theologians in the process of formulating<br />
matters of belief and to teach authoritatively. In all of<br />
these processes, the Holy Spirit is present to guide the entire<br />
church. Whenever there is a disagreement over noninfallible<br />
magisterial teachings, whether it be the faithful in relation to the<br />
magisterium, theologians in relation to the magisterium, or the<br />
magisterium in relation to the faithful and theologians, such disagreements<br />
must be thoroughly investigated to discern their<br />
source, their validity, and if and how it challenges those teachings.<br />
Mere disagreement does not constitute an argument<br />
against noninfallible teachings. What it does warrant is a serious<br />
investigation that can seek to clarify, correct, or in extreme cases<br />
change those teachings on the basis of responsible dialogue.<br />
The only teachings that are beyond correction and change are<br />
infallible teachings.<br />
Both of these ecclesiological models are evident in the early<br />
14 See RICHARD R. GAILLARDETZ, Teaching with Authority: A Theology of the<br />
Magisterium of the Church (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1997) 241-52.<br />
15 Lumen Gentium par. 12.