11.12.2012 Views

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

Avant-propos - Studia Moralia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE MORALITY OF ADOPTING FROZEN EMBRYOS 121<br />

DV is ruling out the crossing of human gametes with those of<br />

other mammals – “genetic bestiality” so to speak – and attempts<br />

to gestate human embryos outside of a human womb.<br />

Thus, we may conclude that the fifth section of Part I of DV<br />

analyzes and morally evaluates the <strong>propos</strong>ed actions of<br />

researchers who see human embryos as mere means for attaining<br />

knowledge, and not as human beings who deserve unconditional<br />

respect for their lives and their physical integrity. This section<br />

is not addressing the morality of embryo transfer (ET) with<br />

regard to already-existing and abandoned cryopreserved<br />

embryos. As such, it cannot be legitimately interpreted as directly<br />

prohibiting the possibility of adopting a cryopreserved<br />

embryo. Furthermore, the question of what can be done with<br />

already created and cryopreserved embryos is nowhere else<br />

addressed in DV. 13<br />

tion of human embryos in all situations. Once one acknowledges that<br />

embryo cryopreservation could, in some circumstances, be undertaken for<br />

therapeutic benefit of the embryo itself, it is clear that there can be no principled<br />

rejection of this technique.<br />

13 The possibility of cryopreserving embryos is only mentioned in two<br />

places in DV (i.e. I,6 and II, 1). In I, 6, DV says that cryopreservation of<br />

embryos “even when carried out in order to preserve the life of an embryo …<br />

constitutes an offence against the respect due to human beings” because of<br />

(at least what was in 1987 likely to be) grave harm or death to them through<br />

this procedure. However, this passage should not be interpreted as ruling out<br />

the possibility of such cryopreservation in circumstances where it would<br />

likely be of therapeutic benefit and enhance the possibility of the embryo<br />

being gestated to term. For DV also says “In the case of experimentation that<br />

is clearly therapeutic, namely, when it is a mattter of experimental forms of<br />

therapy used for the benefit of the embryo itself in a final attempt to save its<br />

life, and in the absence of other reliable forms of therapy, recourse to … procedures<br />

not yet fully tested can be licit.” (I,4) Furthermore, I take it that the<br />

sentence from DV I, 6 quoted above presumes that the cryopreserved<br />

embryos of which it is speaking are not going to be gestated, and such cryopreservation<br />

only extends their dying and subjects them to “further<br />

offences and manipulation.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!