Rousseau_contrat-social
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
If we bear in mind that the election of rulers is a function of<br />
government, and not of Sovereignty, we shall see why the lot is the<br />
method more natural to democracy, in which the administration is better<br />
in proportion as the number of its acts is small.<br />
In every real democracy, magistracy is not an advantage, but a<br />
burdensome charge which cannot justly be imposed on one individual<br />
rather than another. The law alone can lay the charge on him on whom the<br />
lot falls. For, the conditions being then the same for all, and the<br />
choice not depending on any human will, there is no particular<br />
application to alter the universality of the law.<br />
In an aristocracy, the prince chooses the prince, the government is<br />
preserved by itself, and voting is rightly ordered.<br />
The instance of the election of the Doge of Venice confirms, instead of<br />
destroying, this distinction; the mixed form suits a mixed government.<br />
For it is an error to take the government of Venice for a real<br />
aristocracy. If the people has no share in the government, the nobility<br />
is itself the people. A host of poor Barnabotes never gets near any<br />
magistracy, and its nobility consists merely in the empty title of<br />
Excellency, and in the right to sit in the Great Council. As this Great<br />
Council is as numerous as our General Council at Geneva, its illustrious<br />
members have no more privileges than our plain citizens. It is<br />
indisputable that, apart from the extreme disparity between the two<br />
republics, the bourgeoisie of Geneva is exactly equivalent to the<br />
patriciate of Venice; our natives and inhabitants correspond to the<br />
townsmen and the people of Venice; our peasants correspond to the<br />
subjects on the mainland; and, however that republic be regarded, if its<br />
size be left out of account, its government is no more aristocratic than<br />
our own. The whole difference is that, having no life-ruler, we do not,<br />
like Venice, need to use the lot.<br />
Election by lot would have few disadvantages in a real democracy, in<br />
which, as equality would everywhere exist in morals and talents as well<br />
as in principles and fortunes, it would become almost a matter of<br />
indifference who was chosen. But I have already said that a real<br />
86