11.02.2017 Views

DESCRIPTIONS OF MEDICAL FUNGI

fungus3-book

fungus3-book

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

194<br />

Descriptions of Medical Fungi<br />

Trichophyton Malmsten<br />

Rippon (1988) accepted 22 species and four varieties in the genus Trichophyton based<br />

on morphology. DNA sequences now play a prominent role in delineating phylogenetic<br />

relationships, and as such species concepts in Trichophyton have changed. Sixteen<br />

species are now recognised in the genus. The descriptions and species concepts<br />

provided in this publication are based upon a combination of traditional morphological<br />

criteria and the current (2016) recognised phylogenetic species (de Hoog et al. 2016).<br />

The genus Trichophyton is characterised morphologically by the development of both<br />

smooth-walled macro- and microconidia. Macroconidia are mostly borne laterally<br />

directly on the hyphae or on short pedicels, and are thin- or thick-walled, clavate to<br />

fusiform, and range from 4-8 x 8-50 µm in size. Macroconidia are few or absent in many<br />

species. Microconidia are spherical, pyriform to clavate or of irregular shape and range<br />

from 2-3 x 2-4 µm in size. The presence of microconidia differentiates this genus from<br />

Epidermophyton, and the smooth-walled, mostly sessile macroconidia differentiates it<br />

from Lophophyton, Microsporum and Nannizzia.<br />

In practice, two groups may be recognised on direct microscopy:<br />

1. Those species that usually produce microconidia; macroconidia may or may<br />

not be present i.e. T. rubrum, T. interdigitale, T. mentagrophytes, T. equinum, T.<br />

eriotrephon, T. tonsurans, and to a lesser extent T. verrucosum, which may produce<br />

conidia on some media. In these species the shape, size and arrangement of the<br />

microconidia is the most important character. Culture characteristics are also useful.<br />

2. Those species that usually do not produce conidia. Chlamydospores or other<br />

hyphal structures may be present, but microscopy is generally non-diagnostic; i.e.<br />

T. verrucosum, T. violaceum, T. concentricum, T. schoenleinii and T. soudanense.<br />

Culture characteristics and clinical information such as the site, appearance of the<br />

lesion, geographic location, travel history, animal contacts and even occupation are<br />

most important.<br />

Many laboratories have used growth on additional media and/or confirmatory tests to<br />

help differentiate between species of Trichophyton, especially isolates of T. rubrum, T.<br />

interdigitale, T. mentagrophytes and T. tonsurans. These include growth characteristics<br />

on media such as Littman oxgall agar, lactritmel agar, potato dextrose agar, Sabouraud’s<br />

agar with 5% Salt, 1% peptone agar, bromocresol purple-milk solids glucose agar<br />

(BCP), Trichophyton agars No. 1-5, hydrolysis of urea and hair perforation tests.<br />

Molecular Identification: ITS and EF-1α sequencing is recommended for accurate<br />

species identification (Gräser et al. 1998, 1999b, 2000a, 2008; Irinyi et al. 2015;<br />

Mirhendi et al. 2015).<br />

MALDI-T<strong>OF</strong> MS: Methods reported by Erhard et al. (2008), Nenoff et al. (2011),<br />

Cassange et al. (2011), l’Ollivier et al. (2013), Calderaro et al. (2014), Packeu et al.<br />

(2013, 2014).<br />

References: Rebell and Taplin (1970), Ajello (1972), Vanbreusegham et al. (1978),<br />

Rippon (1988), McGinnis (1980), Domsch et al. (1980), Kane et al. (1997), Chen et al.<br />

(2011), de Hoog et al. (2000, 2015, 2016).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!