10.02.2017 Views

A Word to the Little Flock - James S. White

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

"In <strong>the</strong> year 1844, I accepted <strong>the</strong> doctrine we<br />

now hold, concerning <strong>the</strong> nonimmortality of <strong>the</strong><br />

soul, as may be seen by reference <strong>to</strong> Life Sketches,<br />

pp. 170, 171 [1880 ed. See also 1915 ed., p. 49;<br />

Testimonies, Vol. I, pp. 39, 40], and I have never,<br />

by voice or pen, advocated any o<strong>the</strong>r. Had we<br />

suppressed this passage on account of its teaching<br />

<strong>the</strong> immortality of <strong>the</strong> soul, we would have found it<br />

necessary <strong>to</strong> suppress o<strong>the</strong>r passages.<br />

"In relating my first vision, page 13 of Early<br />

Writings [1882 ed.; present ed., p. 17], I speak of<br />

having seen brethren who had but a short time<br />

previous fallen asleep in Jesus, and on page 14<br />

[present ed., p. 18] I state that I was shown a great<br />

company who had suffered martyrdom for <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

faith.<br />

"The immortality of <strong>the</strong> soul is no more taught<br />

in <strong>the</strong> 'suppressed' passage than in <strong>the</strong> two last<br />

cited.<br />

"The fact in <strong>the</strong> case is, that in <strong>the</strong>se visions I<br />

was carried forward <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> time when <strong>the</strong><br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!