11.12.2012 Views

Military Occupational Classification and Structure - U.S. Army

Military Occupational Classification and Structure - U.S. Army

Military Occupational Classification and Structure - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 10–51Z–3<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ards of grade TDA—Continued<br />

Line Duty position Code Grade Explanatory notes<br />

5 SENIOR ENGINEERING<br />

NCO<br />

51Z5O SGM 1. Principal NCO in installation DPWs. Except:<br />

a. USACAC <strong>and</strong> Ft Leavenworth.<br />

b. USAG: Fts Lee <strong>and</strong> Carson; Hawaii <strong>and</strong> Alaska (second position graded SFC).<br />

c. 20th Spt Gp HHC Aug (see line 3).<br />

d. 34th Spt Gp HHC Aug (see line 3).<br />

2. S2/3 Sec, U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Arctic Spt Bde.<br />

3. Opns Ofc, USAADAC <strong>and</strong> Ft Bliss.<br />

4. DCSENGR, U.S. <strong>Army</strong> SOC.<br />

5. Presidential Cntg Prog, U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Wash Hq Svc Elm.<br />

6. U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Avn Ctr <strong>and</strong> Ft Rucker.<br />

7. U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Trans Ctr <strong>and</strong> Ft Eustis.<br />

Notes:<br />

1. When TDA organizations are supported with additional <strong>and</strong>/or dual line TDA positions, the additional line(s) <strong>and</strong> base paragraph will be graded in the aggregate.<br />

2. When no grading guidance is provided by this table for coding TDA, MACOM Manpower Managers will coordinate with the appropriate Branch Personnel Proponents<br />

(listed in AR 600–3) to support additional manpower grading requirements.<br />

Table 10–52C–1<br />

Physical requirements<br />

Skill level Task numbers Tasks<br />

1 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 1. Occasionally lifts <strong>and</strong> lowers 150 pounds up/down 2 feet <strong>and</strong> carry 1 feet as part of a 2 soldier<br />

team prorated at 75 pounds per soldier.<br />

2 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 2. Occasionally lifts/lowers <strong>and</strong> carries 50 pounds.<br />

3 4, 5 3. Must possess normal color vision.<br />

4. Must possess finger dexterity in both h<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

5. Frequently reads complex schematic diagrams.<br />

Table 10–52C–2<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ards of grade TOE/MTOE<br />

Number of positions*<br />

Line Duty position Code Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Explanatory notes<br />

1 Utilities equipment<br />

repairer<br />

2 Utilities equipment<br />

repairer<br />

3 Utilities equipment<br />

repairer<br />

4 Senior utilities equipment<br />

repairer<br />

52C1O PFC 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 1. Grades of additional positions will be in same pattern.<br />

2. SSG counts against total utilities equipment repairer posi-<br />

52C1O SPC 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3<br />

tions.<br />

52C2O SGT 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3<br />

52C3O SSG 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />

5 Technical inspector 52C3O SSG When 10 or more soldiers in this or associated MOS are performing<br />

DS/GS or higher maintenance, one may be designated a<br />

technical inspector.<br />

6 Utilities equipment maintenance<br />

manager<br />

7 Senior quartermaster<br />

<strong>and</strong> chemical equipment<br />

repairer<br />

52C3O SSG Management of ground support equipment in the materiel<br />

branch of support battalion <strong>and</strong> in a MMC.<br />

52C3O SSG One senior repairer for control <strong>and</strong> to provide technical advice<br />

to 4 to 9 MOS 63J QM <strong>and</strong> Chemical Equipment Repairers.<br />

Notes:<br />

1 *Blank spaces in this column indicate not applicable.<br />

2 When TOE/MTOE organizations are supported by an augmentation TDA, augmentation (A) <strong>and</strong> base paragraphs will be graded in the aggregate.<br />

3 When no grading guidance is provided by this table for coding TOE/MTOE, TRADOC MSCs <strong>and</strong> Non-TRADOC specified proponent (TOE Combat Developers) will coordinate<br />

with appropriate Branch Personnel Proponents (listed in AR 600-3) to support additional grading of manpower requirements.<br />

DA PAM 611–21 • 31 March 1999<br />

543

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!