The Golden Chain - Robert J. Wieland

More documents

Recommendations

Info

who knows Ellen White's forthright openness. (e) No one knows (to date) for sure what Baker was teaching that elicited this letter. He, not Jones and Waggoner, was the one teaching or in danger of teaching wrong ideas. He may have been tempted to lapse into an extreme manner of presenting the truth of Christ's humanity. Inasmuch as Ellen White does not condemn Baker or urge him to leave the ministry but in fact encourages him to clarify his teaching, it is possible that he was overreacting to criticism of the 1888 message and in his youth or inexperience was in danger of muddying the waters by imprecise expressions. It is interesting that she made no move to publish this letter or even to incorporate portions of it in volumes of the Testimonies at the time. If Ellen White had felt that Jones's and Waggoner's Christology was faulty or dangerous, she would not have hesitated to publish her letter to Baker in the messages that comprise our volumes of the Testimonies for the Church. 112
2. If Christ took the sinful nature of man after the Fall, would He be "a man with the propensities of sin" that the Baker letter says we must not present Him as having (5BC 1128)? In Ellen White's own context, her use of the term "propensities of sin" means a yielding to temptation, a harboring of an evil purpose, that would be the compulsive result of a previous involvement in an act, word, or thought of sin. She did not teach that we incur guilt genetically. Jones and Waggoner never implied that Christ had "evil propensities." Ellen White defines her own terms. We cannot inject into her use of these words our own misconceptions. She said unot for one moment was there in Him an evil propensity." This language is meaningless unless the phrase "not for one moment" is understood as implying the exercise of personal choice from moment to moment. Such an expression doesn't make sense if it refers to genetic inheritance. Thus an "evil propensity" is understood as sinful character involving personal choice. In the same letter, her 113
Page 1 and 2:
THE GOLDEN CHAIN Robert J. Wieland
Page 3 and 4:
unity in understanding and proclaim
Page 5 and 6:
Though some may be tempted to doubt
Page 7 and 8:
"For years," says Ellen White, "I h
Page 9 and 10:
If such contradiction seems apparen
Page 11 and 12:
een instructed as they should have
Page 13 and 14:
of the realm of sterile theology in
Page 15 and 16:
how this "most precious message" wa
Page 17 and 18:
in letters, articles, and manuscrip
Page 19 and 20:
1888 message, there is indeed a cal
Page 21 and 22:
A Brief Review of the 1888 Concept
Page 23 and 24:
It is possible for those who exerci
Page 25 and 26:
which all fallen descendants of Ada
Page 27 and 28:
16, KJV). That is, He took upon Him
Page 29 and 30:
In what consisted the strength of t
Page 31 and 32:
"likeness" in Romans 8:3 to make cl
Page 33 and 34:
translates it, "tempted exactly as
Page 35 and 36:
We must distinguish between Christ'
Page 37 and 38:
would have some chaff hanging on th
Page 39 and 40:
this subject is not important now.
Page 41 and 42:
lood." And these sinful drives are
Page 43 and 44:
Christ victor over Satan if He pick
Page 45 and 46:
has resulted in a vast amount of mi
Page 47 and 48:
The greater temptations can never c
Page 49 and 50:
Note the point: for Satan to "have
Page 51 and 52:
us, "Let this mind be in you which
Page 53 and 54:
would have sinned if He had taken P
Page 55 and 56:
18. Did Christ in His incarnation h
Page 57 and 58:
ut Christ assures us that He did ha
Page 59 and 60:
Again, the fundamental problem is t
Page 61 and 62: ejoiced in God my Saviour" (Luke 1:
Page 63 and 64: in Jordan (GCB, 1901, p. Id, emphas
Page 65 and 66: have died, for the only "wages of s
Page 67 and 68: danger that the false christ of Bab
Page 69 and 70: The real problem here is the questi
Page 71 and 72: that is just the point of the teach
Page 73 and 74: the finest care any human mother co
Page 75 and 76: limited to the innocent physical ef
Page 77 and 78: although she helped them to clarify
Page 79 and 80: and still be sinless (ibid., p. 62)
Page 81 and 82: and Waggoner were teaching; she rej
Page 83 and 84: publication as Christ and His Right
Page 85 and 86: workers rebuking them when necessar
Page 87 and 88: issues—nobody is "perfect" except
Page 89 and 90: If we say that Christ took the sinl
Page 91 and 92: "passion" ever had a chance to deve
Page 93 and 94: it—by passing over the ground whe
Page 95 and 96: flesh." He did not permit His "fles
Page 97 and 98: commandments." Going to the cross w
Page 99 and 100: Scripture. An "inclination" to sin
Page 101 and 102: 12. What does this statement mean:
Page 103 and 104: A careful reading of Melville and W
Page 105 and 106: come in our "flesh," which is our s
Page 107 and 108: But if He comes no nearer to us tha
Page 109 and 110: "touched with the feeling of our in
Page 111: Chapter 3 Is the “Baker Letter”
Page 115 and 116: 2, pages 2157 and 2158 under "Prope
Page 117 and 118: spotless as when He left the courts
Page 119 and 120: upon Christ, or that He in any way
Page 121 and 122: or corruption as "resting upon Chri
Page 123 and 124: had before communicated with humani
Page 125 and 126: 9. "He [Christ] did humble Himself
Page 127 and 128: that differs from theirs (Feb. 18).
Page 129 and 130: (d) "Every struggle against sin, ev
Page 131 and 132: Testament concepts of Christ's huma
Page 133 and 134: truly spoken through Leo," Vol. 13,
Page 135 and 136: along with Sunday sacredness and ot
Page 137 and 138: 3. If we leave out Augustine's erro
Page 139 and 140: closely intertwined with a correct
Page 141 and 142: and Martyr, says, speaking first of
Page 143 and 144: view is unnecessary? Merely to say
Page 145: effect the salvation of those who b
show all

The Golden Chain - Robert J. Wieland

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?