The Golden Chain - Robert J. Wieland

More documents

Recommendations

Info

either Adam's or ours?" To what extent were her ideas of the nature of Christ taken from Anglicans Henry Melville and Octavius Winslow? <strong>The</strong> evidence is clear that she borrowed ideas and expressions from them, but she never recommended or endorsed their writings as she did those of Jones and Waggoner. In an excellent article published in the December 1989 Ministry Tim Poirier prints in parallel columns Ellen White's and Winslow's statements. Both Melville and Winslow were very perceptive in their defense of the perfect sinlessness of Christ. But neither of these godly Anglicans at that time could understand the relationship between Christ's righteousness and the cleansing of the sanctuary— a preparation for the coming of the Lord. Ellen White discerned that added light in the message of Jones and Waggoner, and rejoiced. She could gather all the help possible from the Anglican theologians in defining the sinlessness of Christ, and also embrace a more complete view than they could have understood. 102
A careful reading of Melville and Winslow raises the question whether they disengaged themselves from Augustinian "original sin." In the 19th century, few Anglicans or Presbyterians could do so. Poirier quotes Melville: "Whilst [Christ] took humanity with the innocent infirmities, He did not take it with the sinful propensities. Here Deity interposed. <strong>The</strong> Holy Ghost overshadowed the virgin, and, allowing weakness to be derived from her, forbade wickedness, and so caused that there should be generated a sorrowing and a suffering humanity, but nevertheless an undefiled and a spotless.... [Thus] Christ's humanity was not... in every respect the humanity of Adam after the Ml" (idem.). It is interesting that in Ellen White's use of phraseology from this Anglican writer she carefully avoided this tincture of Roman Catholicism that was implicit therein. Part of Ellen White's gift was to adapt what best expressed her thought and to leave untouched what was contrary 103
Page 1 and 2:
THE GOLDEN CHAIN Robert J. Wieland
Page 3 and 4:
unity in understanding and proclaim
Page 5 and 6:
Though some may be tempted to doubt
Page 7 and 8:
"For years," says Ellen White, "I h
Page 9 and 10:
If such contradiction seems apparen
Page 11 and 12:
een instructed as they should have
Page 13 and 14:
of the realm of sterile theology in
Page 15 and 16:
how this "most precious message" wa
Page 17 and 18:
in letters, articles, and manuscrip
Page 19 and 20:
1888 message, there is indeed a cal
Page 21 and 22:
A Brief Review of the 1888 Concept
Page 23 and 24:
It is possible for those who exerci
Page 25 and 26:
which all fallen descendants of Ada
Page 27 and 28:
16, KJV). That is, He took upon Him
Page 29 and 30:
In what consisted the strength of t
Page 31 and 32:
"likeness" in Romans 8:3 to make cl
Page 33 and 34:
translates it, "tempted exactly as
Page 35 and 36:
We must distinguish between Christ'
Page 37 and 38:
would have some chaff hanging on th
Page 39 and 40:
this subject is not important now.
Page 41 and 42:
lood." And these sinful drives are
Page 43 and 44:
Christ victor over Satan if He pick
Page 45 and 46:
has resulted in a vast amount of mi
Page 47 and 48:
The greater temptations can never c
Page 49 and 50:
Note the point: for Satan to "have
Page 51 and 52: us, "Let this mind be in you which
Page 53 and 54: would have sinned if He had taken P
Page 55 and 56: 18. Did Christ in His incarnation h
Page 57 and 58: ut Christ assures us that He did ha
Page 59 and 60: Again, the fundamental problem is t
Page 61 and 62: ejoiced in God my Saviour" (Luke 1:
Page 63 and 64: in Jordan (GCB, 1901, p. Id, emphas
Page 65 and 66: have died, for the only "wages of s
Page 67 and 68: danger that the false christ of Bab
Page 69 and 70: The real problem here is the questi
Page 71 and 72: that is just the point of the teach
Page 73 and 74: the finest care any human mother co
Page 75 and 76: limited to the innocent physical ef
Page 77 and 78: although she helped them to clarify
Page 79 and 80: and still be sinless (ibid., p. 62)
Page 81 and 82: and Waggoner were teaching; she rej
Page 83 and 84: publication as Christ and His Right
Page 85 and 86: workers rebuking them when necessar
Page 87 and 88: issues—nobody is "perfect" except
Page 89 and 90: If we say that Christ took the sinl
Page 91 and 92: "passion" ever had a chance to deve
Page 93 and 94: it—by passing over the ground whe
Page 95 and 96: flesh." He did not permit His "fles
Page 97 and 98: commandments." Going to the cross w
Page 99 and 100: Scripture. An "inclination" to sin
Page 101: 12. What does this statement mean:
Page 105 and 106: come in our "flesh," which is our s
Page 107 and 108: But if He comes no nearer to us tha
Page 109 and 110: "touched with the feeling of our in
Page 111 and 112: Chapter 3 Is the “Baker Letter”
Page 113 and 114: 2. If Christ took the sinful nature
Page 115 and 116: 2, pages 2157 and 2158 under "Prope
Page 117 and 118: spotless as when He left the courts
Page 119 and 120: upon Christ, or that He in any way
Page 121 and 122: or corruption as "resting upon Chri
Page 123 and 124: had before communicated with humani
Page 125 and 126: 9. "He [Christ] did humble Himself
Page 127 and 128: that differs from theirs (Feb. 18).
Page 129 and 130: (d) "Every struggle against sin, ev
Page 131 and 132: Testament concepts of Christ's huma
Page 133 and 134: truly spoken through Leo," Vol. 13,
Page 135 and 136: along with Sunday sacredness and ot
Page 137 and 138: 3. If we leave out Augustine's erro
Page 139 and 140: closely intertwined with a correct
Page 141 and 142: and Martyr, says, speaking first of
Page 143 and 144: view is unnecessary? Merely to say
Page 145: effect the salvation of those who b
show all

The Golden Chain - Robert J. Wieland

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?