10.12.2012 Views

Prime Numbers

Prime Numbers

Prime Numbers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.5 Exercises 61<br />

Then using Exercise 1.37 give a proof that the Riemann hypothesis is<br />

equivalent to the elementary assertion<br />

|L(n) − n| < √ n ln 2 n for every integer n ≥ 3, (1.49)<br />

where L(n) is the natural logarithm of the least common multiple of 1, 2,...,n.<br />

If (1.48) is to be the “calculus-course” version of the Riemann hypothesis,<br />

perhaps (1.49) might be referred to as the “precalculus-course” version, in<br />

that all that is used in the formulation here is the concept of least common<br />

multiple and the natural logarithm.<br />

1.39. Using the conjectured form of the PNT in (1.25), prove that<br />

there is a prime between every pair of sufficiently large cubes. Use (1.48)<br />

and any relevant computation to establish that (again, on the Riemann<br />

hypothesis) there is a prime between every two positive cubes. It was shown<br />

unconditionally by Ingham in 1937 that there is a prime between every pair<br />

of sufficiently large cubes, and it was shown, again unconditionally, by Cheng<br />

in 1999, that this is true for cubes greater than e e15<br />

.<br />

1.40. Show that <br />

p≤n−2 1/ ln(n − p) ∼ n/ ln2 n, where the sum is over<br />

primes.<br />

1.41. Using the known theorem that there is a positive number c such that<br />

the number of even numbers up to x that cannot be represented as a sum of<br />

two primes is O(x 1−c ), show that there are infinitely many triples of primes in<br />

arithmetic progression. (For a different approach to the problem, see Exercise<br />

1.42.)<br />

1.42. It is known via the theory of exponential sums that<br />

<br />

n≤x<br />

(R2(2n) −R2(2n)) 2 3 x<br />

= O<br />

ln 5 <br />

, (1.50)<br />

x<br />

where R2(2n) is, as in the text, the number of representations p+q =2n with<br />

p, q prime, and where R2(2n) is given by (1.10); see [Prachar 1978]. Further,<br />

we know from the Brun sieve method that<br />

<br />

n ln ln n<br />

R2(2n) =O<br />

ln 2 <br />

.<br />

n<br />

Show, too, that R2(2n) enjoys the same big-O relation. Use these estimates to<br />

prove that the set of numbers 2p with p prime and with 2p not representable<br />

as a sum of two distinct primes has relative asymptotic density zero in the set<br />

of primes; that is, the number of these exceptional primes p ≤ x is o(π(x)).<br />

In addition, let<br />

A3(x) =# (p, q, r) ∈P 3 : 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!