10.12.2012 Views

Prime Numbers

Prime Numbers

Prime Numbers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.3 <strong>Prime</strong>s of special form 31<br />

argument is made as with Mersenne primes, we get that the number of<br />

Fermat primes is finite. This comes from the convergence of the sum of n/2 n ,<br />

which expression one finds is proportional to the supposed probability that<br />

Fn is prime. If this kind of heuristic is to be taken seriously, it suggests that<br />

there are no more Fermat primes after F4, the point where Fermat stopped,<br />

confidently predicting that all larger Fermat numbers are prime! A heuristic<br />

suggested by H. Lenstra, similar in spirit to the previous estimate on the<br />

density of Mersenne primes, says that the “probability” that Fn is prime is<br />

approximately<br />

e γ lg b<br />

, (1.13)<br />

2n where b is the current limit on the possible prime factors of Fn. If nothing is<br />

known about possible factors, one might use the smallest possible lower bound<br />

b =3·2n+2 +1 for the numerator calculation, giving a rough a priori probability<br />

of n/2n that Fn is prime. (Incidentally, a similar probability argument for<br />

generalized Fermat numbers b2n + 1 appears in [Dubner and Gallot 2002].) It<br />

is from such a probabilistic perspective that Fermat’s guess looms as ill-fated<br />

as can be.<br />

1.3.3 Certain presumably rare primes<br />

There are interesting classes of presumably rare primes. We say “presumably”<br />

because little is known in the way of rigorous density bounds, yet empirical<br />

evidence and heuristic arguments suggest relative rarity. For any odd prime p,<br />

Fermat’s “little theorem” tells us that 2 p−1 ≡ 1(modp). One might wonder<br />

whether there are primes such that<br />

2 p−1 ≡ 1(modp 2 ), (1.14)<br />

such primes being called Wieferich primes. These special primes figure strongly<br />

in the so-called first case of Fermat’s “last theorem,” as follows. In [Wieferich<br />

1909] it is proved that if<br />

x p + y p = z p ,<br />

where p is a prime that does not divide xyz, thenp satisfies relation (1.14).<br />

Equivalently, we say that p is a Wieferich prime if the Fermat quotient<br />

qp(2) = 2p−1 − 1<br />

p<br />

vanishes (mod p). One might guess that the “probability” that qp(2) so<br />

vanishes is about 1/p. Since the sum of the reciprocals of the primes is<br />

divergent (see Exercise 1.20), one might guess that there are infinitely many<br />

Wieferich primes. Since the prime reciprocal sum diverges very slowly, one<br />

might also guess that they are very few and far between.<br />

The Wieferich primes 1093 and 3511 have long been known. Crandall,<br />

Dilcher, and Pomerance, with the computational aid of Bailey, established<br />

that there are no other Wieferich primes below 4 · 10 12 [Crandall et al. 1997].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!