10.12.2012 Views

Prime Numbers

Prime Numbers

Prime Numbers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.6 Exercises 219<br />

what calendar year could F33 be resolved via the Pepin test? Note, in this<br />

connection, the itemized remarks pursuant to Table 1.3.<br />

Analyze and discuss these issues:<br />

(1) The possibility of parallelizing the Pepin squaring (nobody knows how to<br />

parallelize the squaring chain overall in an efficient manner, but indeed one<br />

can parallelize within one squaring operation by establishing each element<br />

of a convolution by way of parallel machinery and the CRT).<br />

(2) The problem of proving the character of Fn is what the final Pepin residue<br />

says it is. This is an issue because, of course, a machine can sustain<br />

either cosmic-ray glitches (hardware) or bugs (software) that ruin the<br />

proof. Incidentally, hardware glitches do happen; after all, any computing<br />

machine, physics tells us, lives in an entropy bath; error probabilities are<br />

patently nonzero. As for checking software bugs, it is important to have<br />

different code on different machines that are supposed to be checking each<br />

other—one does not even want the same programmer responsible for all<br />

machines!<br />

On this latter issue, consider the “wavefront” method, in which one, fastest<br />

available machine performs Pepin squaring, this continual squaring thought of<br />

as a wavefront, with other computations lagging behind in the following way.<br />

Using the wavefront machine’s already deposited Pepin residues, a collection<br />

of (slower, say) machines verify the results of Pepin squarings at various<br />

intermediate junctures along the full Pepin squaring chain. For example,<br />

the fast, wavefront machine might deposit the millionth, two millionth, three<br />

millionth, and four millionth squares of 3; i.e., deposit powers<br />

3 21000000<br />

, 3 22000000<br />

, 3 23000000<br />

, 3 24000000<br />

all modulo Fn, and each of the slow machines would grab a unique one of<br />

these residues, square it just one million times, and expect to find precisely<br />

the deterministic result (the next deposited power).<br />

4.7. Prove the following theorems of Suyama (see [Williams 1998]):<br />

(1) Suppose k is an odd number and N = k2 n + 1 divides the Fermat number<br />

Fm. Prove that if N

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!