10.12.2012 Views

Prime Numbers

Prime Numbers

Prime Numbers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.4 Exercises 111<br />

2.27. Using Theorem 2.3.7 prove the two equalities in relations (2.12).<br />

2.28. Here we prove the celebrated quadratic reciprocity relation (2.11) for<br />

two distinct odd primes p, q. Starting with Definition 2.3.6, show that G is<br />

multiplicative; that is, if gcd(m, n) = 1, then<br />

G(m; n)G(n; m) =G(1; mn).<br />

(Hint: mj 2 /n + nk 2 /m is similar—in a specific sense—to (mj + nk) 2 /(mn).)<br />

Infer from this and Theorem 2.3.7 the relation (now for primes p, q)<br />

<br />

p q<br />

=(−1)<br />

q p<br />

(p−1)(q−1)/4 .<br />

These are examples par excellence of the potential power of exponential<br />

sums; in fact, this approach is one of the more efficient ways to arrive at<br />

reciprocity. Extend the result to obtain the formula of Theorem 2.3.4 for <br />

2<br />

p .<br />

Can this approach be extended to the more general reciprocity statement (i.e.,<br />

for coprime m, n) in Theorem 2.3.4? Incidentally, Gauss sums for nonprime<br />

arguments m, n can be evaluated in closed form, using the techniques of<br />

Exercise 1.66 or the methods summarized in references such as [Graham and<br />

Kolesnik 1991].<br />

2.29. This exercise is designed for honing one’s skills in manipulating Gauss<br />

sums. The task is to count, among quadratic residues modulo a prime p, the<br />

exact number of arithmetic progressions of given length. The formal count of<br />

length-3 progressions is taken to be<br />

<br />

A(p) =# (r, s, t) : <br />

r s t<br />

p = p = p =1;r = s; s − r ≡ t − s (mod p) .<br />

Note we are taking 0 ≤ r, s, t ≤ p − 1, we are ignoring trivial progressions<br />

(r, r, r), and that 0 is not a quadratic residue. So the prime p = 11, for which<br />

the quadratic residues are {1, 3, 4, 5, 9}, enjoys a total of A(11) = 10 arithmetic<br />

progressions of length three. (One of these is 4, 9, 3; i.e., we allow wraparound<br />

(mod 11); and also, descenders such as 5, 4, 3 are allowed.)<br />

First, prove that<br />

p − 1 1<br />

A(p) =− +<br />

2 p<br />

p−1<br />

<br />

e 2πik(r−2s+t)/p ,<br />

k=0 r,s,t<br />

where each of r, s, t runs through the quadratic residues. Then, use relations<br />

(2.12) to prove that<br />

<br />

p − 1<br />

2 −1<br />

A(p) = p − 6 − 2 − .<br />

8<br />

p p<br />

Finally, derive for the exact progression count the attractive expression<br />

<br />

p − 2<br />

A(p) =(p− 1) .<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!