MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ... MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

10.12.2012 Views

40 2 The potential of microinsurance for social protection Yvonne Deblon and Markus Loewe The authors wish to thank Christine Bokstal (ILO), Valerie Schmidt-Diabate (ILO), Iddo Dror (Micro Insurance Academy), Gaby Ramm (consultant), Anja Smith (Cenfri) and John Woodall (ILO) for their review of the chapter. Social protection is recognized internationally as a human right. 1 However, this right is not well enforced by most countries around the globe for different reasons, leaving large segments of their populations without access to adequate social protection measures and vulnerable to numerous risks. In addition, vulnerable people are often unable to improve their socio-economic situation: they are reluctant to invest excess income into productive physical capital or education. Instead, they accumulate “rainy day” funds, savings in cash or in assets (e.g. gold, livestock) that can be accessed if a risk event occurs. As a result, their savings yield only limited returns, which are too small to enable them to build a better life and escape poverty. People who work in the informal economy are particularly prone to becoming marooned in the perpetual circle of vulnerability, risk-aversion and low income. They fall into the widening gap in coverage that exists between the different kinds of social protection schemes found in most developing countries (see Figure 2.1). Wealthy households can afford to buy private health, life, liability and asset insurance. Civil servants are usually entitled to tax-funded pensions and free medical treatment in government hospitals. Other formal-economy employees in many countries are covered by social insurance. Some of the extreme poor may benefit from targeted social assistance. All other people – especially the inhabitants of rural areas, the urban poor, and those working in the informal economy – often have no access whatsoever to any such formal social protection schemes. Workers in the informal economy rely on, and often benefit from, the support provided by relatives and neighbours within their communities. In addition, some households are organized in groups that have the explicit goal of helping their members to manage risks – such as health mutuals and burial societies. While such non-formalized social protection schemes are of considerable importance for their members, they remain limited in terms of their scope and scale. 1 See the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 (Article 22) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 1976 (Article 9). Also, the constitutions of more than 110 independent States make reference to the right to social protection in one way or another.

Th e potential of microinsurance for social protection Moreover, it is often the case that such schemes are insuffi ciently reliable because they are based on moral obligations and goodwill rather than on any formal obligation. Th ere is no mechanism that allows for members to enforce the provision of benefi ts in the event of default, and these schemes are also often highly susceptible to economic stress. Finally, the combined eff ect of trends towards migration, urbanization and the diminishing importance of traditional values and norms are resulting in the evident erosion of, in particular, mutual support networks. Figure 2.1 Th e gap in social protection coverage in a typical developing country Income stratifi cation: Higher income Social insurance: covers 5–60 per cent of the population in low- and middle-income countries (the shaded area illustrates that some countries have been better able than others to extend the coverage of their social insurance schemes to most formal and even some informal-sector employees. Lower income Source: Loewe, 2009b. Formal sector Informal sector Microinsurance is one potentially eff ective instrument for overcoming this situation. Unfortunately, microinsurance is often discussed in isolation and is in many cases implemented without consideration of the underlying context. Its ultimate goal is to reduce the vulnerability of people living on low incomes by enabling them to manage risks more effi ciently. It is thus a social protection instrument, which should not be overlooked when a social policy strategy is developed. Th ere are alternatives to microinsurance for reaching this goal, which may be more or less eff ective depending on the particular context concerned, but it still warrants consideration. 41 Private insurance: up to 12 per cent Th e dotted line represents the border between the formal and the informal sector, which is, of course, less clear-cut than the fi gure makes us assume. Th e shape of the line illustrates that all the poor are working in the informal-sector, while not all informal-sector workers are poor! Th e bulk of informal-sector workers enjoy no social protection other than mutual support provided on voluntary grounds among friends, relatives and neighbours. Microinsurance: up to 5 per cent Basic social protection/ social transfer schemes: up to 10 per cent

40<br />

2 The potential of microinsurance for social protection<br />

Yvonne Deblon and Markus Loewe<br />

The authors wish to thank Christine Bokstal (ILO), Valerie Schmidt-Diabate (ILO), Iddo Dror<br />

(Micro Insurance Academy), Gaby Ramm (consultant), Anja Smith (Cenfri) and John Woodall (ILO)<br />

for their review of the chapter.<br />

Social protection is recognized internationally as a human right. 1 However, this<br />

right is not well enforced by most countries around the globe for different reasons,<br />

leaving large segments of their populations without access to adequate<br />

social protection measures and vulnerable to numerous risks. In addition, vulnerable<br />

people are often unable to improve their socio-economic situation: they<br />

are reluctant to invest excess income into productive physical capital or education.<br />

Instead, they accumulate “rainy day” funds, savings in cash or in assets (e.g.<br />

gold, livestock) that can be accessed if a risk event occurs. As a result, their<br />

savings yield only limited returns, which are too small to enable them to build a<br />

better life and escape poverty.<br />

People who work in the informal economy are particularly prone to becoming<br />

marooned in the perpetual circle of vulnerability, risk-aversion and low<br />

income. They fall into the widening gap in coverage that exists between the different<br />

kinds of social protection schemes found in most developing countries (see<br />

Figure 2.1). Wealthy households can afford to buy private health, life, liability<br />

and asset insurance. Civil servants are usually entitled to tax-funded pensions<br />

and free medical treatment in government hospitals. Other formal-economy<br />

employees in many countries are covered by social insurance. Some of the<br />

extreme poor may benefit from targeted social assistance. All other people – especially<br />

the inhabitants of rural areas, the urban poor, and those working in the<br />

informal economy – often have no access whatsoever to any such formal social<br />

protection schemes.<br />

Workers in the informal economy rely on, and often benefit from, the support<br />

provided by relatives and neighbours within their communities. In addition,<br />

some households are organized in groups that have the explicit goal of helping<br />

their members to manage risks – such as health mutuals and burial societies.<br />

While such non-formalized social protection schemes are of considerable importance<br />

for their members, they remain limited in terms of their scope and scale.<br />

1 See the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 (Article 22) and the <strong>International</strong> Covenant on<br />

Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 1976 (Article 9). Also, the constitutions of more than 110 independent<br />

States make reference to the right to social protection in one way or another.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!