10.12.2012 Views

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

592 Infrastructure and environment for microinsurance<br />

26.5 Emerging good practices<br />

A number of emerging good practices have been identified that might form the<br />

core of a proportionate consumer protection regime for microinsurance. Before<br />

they could form the basis of any normative regulatory recommendations, however,<br />

they would need to be tested on the ground and tailored to context. The<br />

practices are categorized under the three broad consumer-protection goals of<br />

transparency, fair treatment and effective recourse.<br />

1) Transparency:<br />

– Require that the client knows who the ultimate insurer is, e.g. when the insurer’s name<br />

is clearly stated in the sales documents, the policy and any “Key Facts” documents.<br />

– Require adequate and comprehensible disclosure of the price of the policy, what<br />

it does (and does not) provide, the premium payment obligations, when and<br />

how a claim can be made under the contract, and for how much, including any<br />

exclusions or limitations on cover arising out of explicit or implied warranties.<br />

– Require adequate and comprehensible disclosure of claims procedures and how<br />

to access recourse mechanisms if things do not go as expected.<br />

– Given the profile of microinsurance consumers, such disclosures will need to be<br />

as simple, comprehensible and accessible as possible to those with lower levels of<br />

income, experience and formal education. Standardization of disclosure formats<br />

and wordings can help facilitate consumer understanding and comparison of the<br />

different products available.<br />

2) Fair treatment:<br />

– Require mechanisms to be in place that will mitigate the impact of high-pressure<br />

sales practices by ensuring that potential consumers have time to consider the<br />

suitability and value for money of the product(s) on offer. Examples of such<br />

mechanisms include post-sale call-back by the insurer (using electronic means<br />

where possible) and free look periods (see section 26.3).<br />

– Give attention to the effect of overly obtuse wording, especially if it limits the<br />

delivery of insurance services when customers might otherwise expect that they<br />

would be delivered, and consider encouraging operators to offer relatively simple<br />

products (e.g. those with standard wordings or restrictions on arcane exclusions<br />

and warranties).<br />

– Allow product bundling when it affords benefits (e.g. cost savings or convenience)<br />

to customers as well as the provider, subject to suitability and disclosure<br />

requirements being met. 23<br />

23 While bundling may occur at point of sale, the different products may still be effectively provided by<br />

different institutions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!