10.12.2012 Views

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26 Protecting consumers while promoting<br />

microinsurance<br />

Rodney Lester and Katharine McKee<br />

The authors wish to thank various reviewers for their comments and guidance, including, Doubell Chamberlain<br />

(Cenfri), Arup Chatterjee (ADB), Tim Lyman (CGAP), Thomas Mahl (Munich Re), Beth Rhyne<br />

(Accion) and Martina Wiedmaier-Pfister (GIZ). Funding for this chapter was provided by CGAP.<br />

Ultimately, microinsurance markets will not develop unless they demonstrably<br />

meet the particular needs of the economically active poor. 1 Recent empirical<br />

research from China, India and Kenya also suggests that trust and the perceived<br />

credibility of the product and the institution(s) involved in building long-term<br />

demand are important (for example Dercon et al., 2011, Cai et al., 2009; Cole et<br />

al., 2010). The existence of appropriate consumer protection measures can both<br />

help build trust in microinsurance products and providers, and encourage sound<br />

market development.<br />

While a considerable amount of work has been done to develop a relatively<br />

standardized regulatory framework for consumer protection in mainstream retail<br />

insurance markets, 2 the microinsurance market may have specific characteristics<br />

that suggest a need for a more tailored approach. Typical consumers might be less<br />

able to assess how well a specific insurance policy fits their needs, or they might<br />

be more vulnerable to pressure sales or mis-selling. For example, recent empirical<br />

work in India finds that “consumers demonstrating lower levels of sophistication<br />

are more likely to be offered the wrong product” (Anagol, 2011).<br />

At the same time, the low-income insurance market is still well below its<br />

potential size in many developing countries, and many regulatory authorities<br />

now have explicit mandates for financial inclusion as well as prudential supervision.<br />

Given the potential benefits of insurance cover for low-income consumers<br />

that are currently underserved, policymakers will want to avoid unintentionally<br />

“protecting consumers out of the market” by adopting rules that make serving<br />

these new markets unviable. In addition, rapid innovation in products, channels<br />

and business models is necessary to bring down costs, meet consumer needs better<br />

1 The primary focus of this chapter is on the interaction between the individual economically active<br />

poor consumer and the insurance market, rather than cover for the indigent or other social insurance<br />

provided by government to a defined population.<br />

2 <strong>International</strong> Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) has set up a sub-committee to consider this<br />

topic, although it is has been addressed at a high level by the IAIS Assessment Methodology since<br />

2000. Both the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and Financial<br />

Stability Board (FSB) have also set up consultative committees under a post-financial-crisis mandate<br />

from the G-20, and the World Bank has issued a set of good practices (based on work in Eastern<br />

Europe) for public comment<br />

573

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!