10.12.2012 Views

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Access to insurance and fi nancial sector regulation<br />

Box 25.3 Th e evolving defi nition of microinsurance in Peru<br />

Superintendencia de Banca, Seguros y AFP (SBS) in Peru introduced its fi rst<br />

specifi c regulation on microinsurance in 2007 to promote the provision of<br />

aff ordable insurance to the low-income population.<br />

In terms of product attributes, the regulation was applicable to products that<br />

did not exceed US$3 300 cover limit or US$3.30 monthly premium. Th e focus<br />

was on simplicity and the insurance needs of the target market. Deductibles and<br />

co-payments and any prior assessment of the insured values at the time of under-<br />

writing were prohibited. A list of acceptable claims documents was also to be<br />

specifi ed in a simplifi ed policy document. To assess compliance with these crite-<br />

ria, all microinsurance products were to be fi led and reviewed by the insurance<br />

regulator before being marketed to the public.<br />

In the event of a claim, the policyholder was required to notify the agent or<br />

the sales clerk, who in turn acted as the interface between the policyholder and<br />

insurance company. Th e insurer had the option to pay the claim through the<br />

agent or directly to the policyholder. If the claim was rejected, the policyholder<br />

had the option to make a complaint through the agent, and the insurer was<br />

required to resolve complaints within 15 days.<br />

To reduce costs, marketing through alternative distribution channels (e.g.<br />

sales clerks, MFIs, savings and credit cooperatives, and social organizations) was<br />

allowed in a partner-agent relationship. Th ese channels had access to the lowincome<br />

population and were capable of collecting premiums and quickly han-<br />

dling claims. Th ey were also responsible for explaining the insurance benefi ts and<br />

costs to their clients. Innovative techniques for off ering more tangible insurance<br />

benefi ts (e.g. tickets or certifi cates, regular visits and reports to customers, and<br />

payment in goods and services) were also introduced. Th e insurers were ulti-<br />

mately responsible for the management of risks and regulatory compliance.<br />

When implementing the regulation, the SBS did not see the volume of activ- activ-<br />

ity that it expected, and soon realized that regulatory caps on prices and benefi ts<br />

acted as obstacles to developing microinsurance products. Th erefore, in consultation<br />

with the industry, in 2009 a new regulation removing limits on cover or pre-<br />

miums was introduced to provide a further boost to the market. <strong>Microinsurance</strong><br />

is now expected to respond to the protection needs of specifi c groups. Exclusions<br />

can be introduced, if necessary, but are to be kept at a minimum and should be<br />

commensurate with the cover. Minimum information requirements for thesim- plifi ed contracts and documents that insurance companies or intermedi intermediaries aries need<br />

to provide to the policyholders as proof of cover have also been set out.<br />

Th e functions which intermediaries can perform have been expanded and<br />

they are now permitted to collect premiums, attend to claims and pay benefi ts on<br />

behalf of insurance companies, but they have now also been made accountable<br />

559

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!