10.12.2012 Views

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

500 Delivery channels and intermediaries<br />

The question of trust relative to value is also highlighted by experience in<br />

South Africa, where funeral insurance sold by different channels has different levels<br />

of success. The rural vendor Take-it-Eezi has had considerably less take-up<br />

than the well-trusted, low-cost clothing and small appliance store Pep. Whilst<br />

Pep has managed to accumulate a high level of trust in the low-income market,<br />

Take-it-Eezi is a less well-known brand used to network a number of informal<br />

rural vendors around a third-party payment system. 5 This may also be a direct<br />

consequence of the differing nature of the target markets of the two distribution<br />

partners – Pep tends to serve a slightly higher-income market than Take-it-Eezi.<br />

22.3.5 Partnership management<br />

“<strong>Microinsurance</strong> belongs to the distribution channel” has proved true in many of<br />

the cases where retailers and utility and telecommunications companies assert<br />

their dominance and power in all aspects of the distribution process. The<br />

increased bargaining power of distribution channels relative to the insurance<br />

company enables channels to negotiate a higher proportion of the premium as<br />

remuneration than traditional insurance distributors would be able to do.<br />

A critical theme emerging in the distribution story is the necessity to align the<br />

incentives of the distribution channel with those of the insurance company. Aon<br />

Affinity in Brazil was able to do this by creating products that cover the liability<br />

(e.g. electricity or telephone bill or finance repayment) of the distribution partner<br />

should its client be affected by an insured event (e.g. unemployment, personal<br />

accident or disability). Furthermore, it remunerated the distribution channel for<br />

providing client information and collecting premiums.<br />

The remuneration relationship between the insurer and distribution partner<br />

can take different forms. In some cases, as with Hollard’s relationship with Pep,<br />

the remuneration comes in the form of profit-sharing through a joint venture, in<br />

addition to the commission received by Pep. In other cases, the distribution partner<br />

receives only a fixed commission. The remuneration model is affected by the<br />

level of equity attached to the distribution partners’ brand – the higher the level<br />

of trust and recognition attached to the brand, the greater the bargaining power<br />

of the distribution channel.<br />

Well-trusted distribution channels face the greatest reputational risk and<br />

therefore also choose to be involved in the product development and revision<br />

process because they know their clients and want to ensure that they provide<br />

them with value. Furthermore, distribution partners who have greater levels of<br />

5 It should, however, be noted that the funeral insurance policies underwritten by Hollard and distributed<br />

through Take-it-Eezi and Pep do not suffer from the same low claims ratios as noted in Brazil<br />

and Colombia.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!