MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...
MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ... MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...
486 22 New frontiers in microinsurance distribution Anja Smith, Herman Smit and Doubell Chamberlain This chapter is adapted from Microinsurance Paper No. 8, published by the ILO’s Microinsurance Innovation Facility. he authors would like to thank Aparna Dalal (ILO), Jeremy Leach (Hollard), Brandon Mathews (Zurich), Michael J. McCord (Micro Insurance Centre), Pranav Prashad (ILO) and Dirk Reinhard (Munich Re Foundation) for reviewing the paper. The case studies that contributed to this chapter were funded by Swiss Development Cooperation and FinMark Trust. Achieving scale through cost-effective distribution is one of the biggest challenges for the development of viable, small premium products. To effectively reach as large a client base as possible, the emphasis is increasingly falling on innovative distribution models as alternatives to traditional microinsurance distribution, which typically relies on microfinance institutions (MFIs). During the last decade, insurance providers and distribution partners have experimented with innovative ways to extend insurance to low-income households. This chapter considers the experiences of 14 sets of microinsurance innovators from Brazil, Colombia, India and South Africa which are using partnerships to distribute insurance through the following channels: 1 – cash-based retailers, including supermarkets and clothing retailers, offering simplified personal accident and funeral insurance products; – credit-based retailers, such as furniture and electronic goods stores offering credit life, extended warranties, personal accident and life insurance products; – utility and telecommunications companies offering disability, unemployment, personal accident and, in some cases, household structure insurance; and – third-party bill payment providers offering personal accident and life insurance products. These models were selected because of their unique and interesting approaches to both the product-development and distribution processes. Case studies on their experiences were produced on the basis of information collected through interviews with insurance providers, their distribution partners and, in some cases, with third-party administrators or brokers. The interview information was supplemented by evidence gathered from company websites and annual reports, as well as available media reports and other research documents. Given that the case studies are public documents, data that may provide a more detailed view on the success 1 The examples described in this chapter are drawn from the following case studies available at www.cenfri. org: Smit and Smith, 2010a, 2010b; Smith and Smit, 2010a, 2010b, 2010c, 2010d; Smith, Smit and Chamberlain, 2010; Zuluaga, 2010.
New frontiers in microinsurance distribution 487 and value of different models and products, such as the number of policies sold, claims ratios, policy persistency and profit generated, could not always be included. This chapter is structured as follows. The first section examines the concept of alternative distribution in the microinsurance context and introduces the case studies. Section 22.2 focuses on the emerging categories of alternative distribution and their respective strengths and weaknesses. The third section considers the key themes and issues emerging from these new distribution models. Section 22.4 concludes with a brief look at the future of microinsurance distribution. 22.1 Rethinking distribution For the purpose of this study, alternative distribution was loosely defined as voluntary insurance models utilizing partnerships with institutions traditionally not involved in insurance to reach underserved, low-income households. These models typically share the following characteristics: – Scale through aggregation: Ability to achieve scale by targeting large client concentrations such as specific non-insurance client groups, including clients of retailers, mobile-phone companies and utility companies. – Presence of infrastructure footprint: When entering into partnerships with organizations with large client concentrations, alternative distribution models typically rely on a community presence that is larger than what an insurance company could achieve on its own. The infrastructure could be physical, such as store buildings, or virtual, such as a mobile-phone network. – Transaction platform: The sales channel typically doubles as a premium-collection platform. One example is adding premiums onto a utility bill. – Stand-alone voluntary product: Models often distribute voluntary products on an “opt-in” rather than “opt-out” basis. Buying insurance is therefore an explicit choice by the customer, rather than an automatic addition to another product or service. – Trusted brand: The majority of models rely on a distribution partnership with a well-trusted brand. Where models do not have this benefit, it has negatively impacted the success of the model. Distribution is a much wider concept than simply getting the insurance product to the client. In Figure 22.1, distribution refers to all interactions that take place between the underwriter of the risk and the ultimate client, which includes policy origination, premium collection and policy administration, as well as all marketing, sales and claims-payment activities. This process may involve several different entities, including; 1) insurance companies (risk carriers); 2) outsourced administrators; 3) thirdparty payment providers (who, in some cases, also aggregate clients); and 4) the client
- Page 457 and 458: Insights from India’s microinsura
- Page 459 and 460: Insights from India’s microinsura
- Page 461 and 462: Insights from India’s microinsura
- Page 463 and 464: Insights from India’s microinsura
- Page 465 and 466: Insights from India’s microinsura
- Page 467 and 468: Insights from India’s microinsura
- Page 469 and 470: Insights from India’s microinsura
- Page 471 and 472: Comparative features of the four la
- Page 473 and 474: Insights from India’s microinsura
- Page 475 and 476: Insights from India’s microinsura
- Page 477 and 478: Insights from India’s microinsura
- Page 479 and 480: Insights from India’s microinsura
- Page 481 and 482: Insights from India’s microinsura
- Page 483 and 484: Insights from India’s microinsura
- Page 485 and 486: Insights from India’s microinsura
- Page 487 and 488: Pricing of microinsurance products
- Page 489 and 490: Pricing of microinsurance products
- Page 491 and 492: Pricing of microinsurance products
- Page 493 and 494: Pricing of microinsurance products
- Page 495 and 496: Pricing of microinsurance products
- Page 497 and 498: Pricing of microinsurance products
- Page 499 and 500: Pricing of microinsurance products
- Page 501 and 502: Pricing of microinsurance products
- Page 503 and 504: Pricing of microinsurance products
- Page 505: Pricing of microinsurance products
- Page 510 and 511: 488 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 512 and 513: Table 22.2 Summary of insurance bus
- Page 514 and 515: 492 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 516 and 517: 494 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 518 and 519: 496 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 520 and 521: 498 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 522 and 523: 500 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 524 and 525: 502 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 526 and 527: 504 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 528 and 529: 506 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 530 and 531: 508 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 532 and 533: 510 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 534 and 535: 512 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 536 and 537: 514 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 538 and 539: 516 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 540 and 541: 518 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 542 and 543: 520 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 544 and 545: 522 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 546 and 547: 524 Delivery channels and intermedi
- Page 549 and 550: VIII Protecting consumers while pro
- Page 551 and 552: The technology revolution in microi
- Page 553 and 554: Th e technology revolution in micro
- Page 555 and 556: Th e technology revolution in micro
- Page 557 and 558: Th e technology revolution in micro
New frontiers in microinsurance distribution<br />
487<br />
and value of different models and products, such as the number of policies sold,<br />
claims ratios, policy persistency and profit generated, could not always be included.<br />
This chapter is structured as follows. The first section examines the concept of<br />
alternative distribution in the microinsurance context and introduces the case<br />
studies. Section 22.2 focuses on the emerging categories of alternative distribution<br />
and their respective strengths and weaknesses. The third section considers<br />
the key themes and issues emerging from these new distribution models. Section<br />
22.4 concludes with a brief look at the future of microinsurance distribution.<br />
22.1 Rethinking distribution<br />
For the purpose of this study, alternative distribution was loosely defined as voluntary<br />
insurance models utilizing partnerships with institutions traditionally not<br />
involved in insurance to reach underserved, low-income households. These models<br />
typically share the following characteristics:<br />
– Scale through aggregation: Ability to achieve scale by targeting large client concentrations<br />
such as specific non-insurance client groups, including clients of<br />
retailers, mobile-phone companies and utility companies.<br />
– Presence of infrastructure footprint: When entering into partnerships with<br />
organizations with large client concentrations, alternative distribution models<br />
typically rely on a community presence that is larger than what an insurance<br />
company could achieve on its own. The infrastructure could be physical, such as<br />
store buildings, or virtual, such as a mobile-phone network.<br />
– Transaction platform: The sales channel typically doubles as a premium-collection<br />
platform. One example is adding premiums onto a utility bill.<br />
– Stand-alone voluntary product: Models often distribute voluntary products on an<br />
“opt-in” rather than “opt-out” basis. Buying insurance is therefore an explicit choice<br />
by the customer, rather than an automatic addition to another product or service.<br />
– Trusted brand: The majority of models rely on a distribution partnership with a<br />
well-trusted brand. Where models do not have this benefit, it has negatively<br />
impacted the success of the model.<br />
Distribution is a much wider concept than simply getting the insurance product<br />
to the client. In Figure 22.1, distribution refers to all interactions that take place<br />
between the underwriter of the risk and the ultimate client, which includes policy<br />
origination, premium collection and policy administration, as well as all marketing,<br />
sales and claims-payment activities. This process may involve several different entities,<br />
including; 1) insurance companies (risk carriers); 2) outsourced administrators; 3) thirdparty<br />
payment providers (who, in some cases, also aggregate clients); and 4) the client