MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ... MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

10.12.2012 Views

22 Emerging issues social and fi nancial impact by saying, “Microinsurance is a double bottom-line business: it has an immediate social impact and, importantly from our perspective, also has a long-term fi nancial impact. With microinsurance, we tap a huge market of low-income households at the bottom of the economic pyramid” (Allianz Group, 2011). Insurers can fi nd easier ways to make money than microinsurance. Th e pull of profi tability helps to keep them focused on effi ciency and market satisfaction, while the CSR angle provides some space for experimentation. Chapter 19 explores this tension between being good corporate citizens and expanding market share, while Box 1.3 highlights the reputation risk to which insurers are exposed as they pursue BoP profi ts. Box 1.3 Critique of the BoP approach Th e fi rst volume of Protecting the poor applied Prahalad’s “bottom of the pyrapyra- mid” (BoP) business strategy to the insurance industry, suggesting that it might be an eff ective means to provide cover to low-income markets that could benefi t both the insured and the insurer. In the following years, Prahalad’s treatise has also attracted some criticism, warranting a closer investigation. Some critics challenge the motivations of corporations, and do not believe that they really can achieve a double bottom-line result. Others are concerned that sellsell- ing consumer goods to the poor may do little to eradicate poverty, and could even harm small businesses and threaten local jobs, for example if they buy from multi- nationals instead of from local producers. Another line of questioning relates to the target group, where perhaps Prahalad’s business model may apply to the upwardly mobile poor poor and emerging consumers, but but not to the poorest of the poor. One of of the most vocal critics, Aneel Karnani Karnani from from the University University of Michigan (2009), believes believes the BoP approach approach does not recognize that poor people people often act against against their own self-interests and and leads leads to to a romanticized view of BoP people people as value- conscious consumers and resilient entrepreneurs (which) are not only false, false, but but also harmful. harmful. Th e assumption that all the poor need is an opportunity to improve their livelihood is dangerous, according to Karnani, because it leads states to build too few legal, regulatory, and social mechanisms mechanisms to protect the poor, as well as to to rely too heavily on market solutions to to poverty. Th e e failure of this approach was evident in the Andhra Andhra Pradesh microfi nance crisis, where where the lack of supervision supervision of lending institutions enabled borrowers borrowers to take take multiple loans that they did not have have the the capacity to understand or repay. Criticism of the BoP approach, and the microfi nance crisis, certainly raise alarm bells for microinsurance. Given the complex nature of insurance, it is diffi - cult for consumers to understand, and they are vulnerable to mis-selling by agents

Current trends in microinsurance and to being misled by disreputable fi rms. Th ese observations highlight the importance for insurers going down-market of carefully considering whether they are providing client value value (Chapter 15), for policymakers and insurance asso- ciations of promoting eff ective consumer protection (Chapter 26), and for regula- tors of cracking down on illegal insurers that could undermine the fl fl edgling insurance culture in low-income markets (Chapter 25). Insurers need to be aware of the BoP criticisms, and respond accordingly. Few insurers would claim that they had any intention of reaching the very bottom of the pyramid, but were more interested in expanding the insurance market by including under-served segments. In addition, the provision of insurance should not replace local risk-management strategies, but rather enhance their eff ectiveness. In fact, insurance is fundamentally diff erent from shampoo or salt, the con- sumer goods often highlighted in BoP business models, because it provides an essential risk-management service that really can enable low-income families to stave off destitution. Th e emerging focus on the profi tability of microinsurance, analysed in Chapter 18, has spawned eff orts to reduce operational costs and have eff ective processes to serve masses of clients. To support scale, insurers recognize the need to effi ciently process huge volumes of data, while securely linking into delivery channels’ systems to facilitate data transfer. At the same time, front-offi ce technology, from handheld and point-of-sale devices to mobile phones, are beginning to improve sales, premium collection and even claims settlement. Th e role of technology in microinsurance is explored in Chapter 24. Some reinsurers have been interested in fi nding a role in microinsurance for years. With supply dominated by simple life covers, most commercial schemes had little need for reinsurance. However, as client demand has been better understood, and insurers have been interested in addressing those needs, reinsurers have become more important to the equation. Insurers in many cases have needed not only the reinsurers’ fi nancial safety net, but also their expertise in navigating the risks of more complex products. As noted by a senior person at Swiss Re, “Insurance is a cornerstone of economic growth and stability, and [we] … are proud to contribute our expertise so that even the poorest farmers and their families can cope when crops are ruined by drought, fl ood or other climate-related impacts” (Swiss Re, 2011). Reinsurers have contributed to developing more complex products, such as health and index-based insurance, and enabling disaster covers to be written. Indeed, with index insurance, most if not all of the risk is ceded to the reinsurer (see Chapters 4 and 11, and section 20.2). 23

Current trends in microinsurance<br />

and to being misled by disreputable fi rms. Th ese observations highlight the<br />

importance for insurers going down-market of carefully considering whether<br />

they are providing client value value (Chapter 15), for policymakers and insurance asso-<br />

ciations of promoting eff ective consumer protection (Chapter 26), and for regula-<br />

tors of cracking down on illegal insurers that could undermine the fl fl edgling<br />

insurance culture in low-income markets (Chapter 25).<br />

Insurers need to be aware of the BoP criticisms, and respond accordingly. Few<br />

insurers would claim that they had any intention of reaching the very bottom of<br />

the pyramid, but were more interested in expanding the insurance market by<br />

including under-served segments. In addition, the provision of insurance should<br />

not replace local risk-management strategies, but rather enhance their eff ectiveness.<br />

In fact, insurance is fundamentally diff erent from shampoo or salt, the con-<br />

sumer goods often highlighted in BoP business models, because it provides an<br />

essential risk-management service that really can enable low-income families to<br />

stave off destitution.<br />

Th e emerging focus on the profi tability of microinsurance, analysed in<br />

Chapter 18, has spawned eff orts to reduce operational costs and have eff ective<br />

processes to serve masses of clients. To support scale, insurers recognize the need<br />

to effi ciently process huge volumes of data, while securely linking into delivery<br />

channels’ systems to facilitate data transfer. At the same time, front-offi ce<br />

technology, from handheld and point-of-sale devices to mobile phones, are<br />

beginning to improve sales, premium collection and even claims settlement. Th e<br />

role of technology in microinsurance is explored in Chapter 24.<br />

Some reinsurers have been interested in fi nding a role in microinsurance for<br />

years. With supply dominated by simple life covers, most commercial schemes<br />

had little need for reinsurance. However, as client demand has been better<br />

understood, and insurers have been interested in addressing those needs,<br />

reinsurers have become more important to the equation. Insurers in many cases<br />

have needed not only the reinsurers’ fi nancial safety net, but also their expertise<br />

in navigating the risks of more complex products. As noted by a senior person<br />

at Swiss Re, “Insurance is a cornerstone of economic growth and stability,<br />

and [we] … are proud to contribute our expertise so that even the poorest<br />

farmers and their families can cope when crops are ruined by drought, fl ood or<br />

other climate-related impacts” (Swiss Re, 2011). Reinsurers have contributed to<br />

developing more complex products, such as health and index-based insurance,<br />

and enabling disaster covers to be written. Indeed, with index insurance, most<br />

if not all of the risk is ceded to the reinsurer (see Chapters 4 and 11, and section<br />

20.2).<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!