10.12.2012 Views

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

416 Insurers and microinsurance<br />

preferences to fi nd appropriate ways of interacting with the target group,<br />

particularly with regard to technology (see Box 19.8).<br />

Box 19.8 Meeting the market where it is<br />

Cover2go, a subsidiary of Metropolitan Life in South Africa, developed an inno- inno-<br />

vative commuter insurance product combining the use of agents at transport<br />

centres and mobile phone technology. Th e product provided personal accident<br />

cover of US$2 US$ US$2 2 140 for a one-off premium of US$1.40 US$ US$1.40 1.40 over a holiday period when<br />

a large number of people are travelling. It was sold through agents at the trans-<br />

port centre, with the premium being deducted from the mobile phone credit.<br />

Confi rmation of purchase of the policy was sent to policyholders via SMS. Th e<br />

research conducted prior to the launch suggested that there was much interest in<br />

the product, but very few policies were actually sold. Investigations into the poor<br />

sales of the product revealed that:<br />

– Benefi ts and premiums did not match the market’s expectations. Th e product<br />

seemed “too good to be true” and policyholders did not expect such high bene-<br />

fi ts to be paid.<br />

– Policyholders did not have suffi cient mobile phone credit to pay premiums.<br />

– Policyholders were uncomfortable using SMS to provide information and<br />

inform benefi ciaries of cover; they preferred tangible policy documents.<br />

Th e Cover2go experience provides important insights into the need to bear in<br />

mind the customers’ expectations regarding premiums and benefi ts, and meeting<br />

customers where they are in terms of the use of technology.<br />

Source: Smith and Smit, 2010c.<br />

Building loss prevention techniques into the benefi t design can be<br />

important to cover risks or market segments that were previously considered<br />

uninsurable. Encouraging risk-mitigating behaviour also allows insurance<br />

cover to be provided at lower premiums, which is important in the<br />

low-income market. For example, a livestock insurance pilot by Mutual and<br />

Federal in South Africa is linking with agricultural offi cers to ensure that cattle<br />

are branded (for identifi cation when a loss occurs) and dipped (for protection<br />

from diseases). Th is initiative introduces risk management into the insurance<br />

process. Th e farmers benefi t as their cattle are protected from diseases and they<br />

have access to insurance cover. Th e insurer can provide cover at more<br />

aff ordable levels because the risk is lower. Working with the community in this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!