10.12.2012 Views

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

414 Insurers and microinsurance<br />

Organizational arrangements<br />

To integrate old resources with new processes, insurers may use diff erent<br />

approaches to supporting microinsurance: drawing on existing resources, outsourcing<br />

functions, or establishing a separate business unit or joint venture with<br />

dedicated microinsurance resources. Naturally, each approach has advantages<br />

and disadvantages, as illustrated in Table 19.2, but for companies that are really<br />

committed to serving the low-income market over the long term, the “ringfenced”<br />

model appears particularly compelling.<br />

Table 19.2 Various approaches to structuring the business<br />

Coordinating:<br />

Relatively low start-up<br />

Drawing on existing busi- busi- busi- and overhead overhead costs for<br />

ness resources, coordinated microinsurance<br />

microinsurance<br />

by a central micro insurance<br />

team<br />

Outsourcing: Acquiring<br />

micro insurance resources<br />

externally (actuaries, sys-<br />

tems, etc.)<br />

Pros Cons Example<br />

– Constant tension<br />

between traditional and<br />

microinsurance business<br />

– Access to resources is<br />

highly contingent and<br />

unpredictable<br />

– Mutual and Federal and<br />

Santam manage micro- micro- micro-<br />

insurance under their<br />

New Markets and Emerg- Emerg- Emerging<br />

Markets business divi-<br />

sions respectively<br />

– Relatively low start-up – Limited learning oppor- oppor- oppor- – Allianz relies on its part- part- part-<br />

costs<br />

tunities for insurer ner PlaNet Guarantee to<br />

– Higher fl exibility – Limited ability to capture manage microinsurance<br />

to choose between diff er- long-term value<br />

relationships with various<br />

ent systems<br />

– Reliance on outsourcing MFIs in African countries<br />

– Ability to get “proven” partner for innovation (Gradl et al., 2010)<br />

solution for systems, etc. projects<br />

Separate business unit – Better accessibility of<br />

– Higher start-up costs<br />

or joint venture (ring- resources<br />

– Need to utilize resources<br />

fencing):<br />

– Greater fl exibility to uti- uti- uti- built up fully, loss of<br />

Building separate division/ lize ring-fenced resources short term fl exibility<br />

joint venture with with the in an appropriate manner<br />

resources needed for micro- – Build a microinsurance<br />

insurance<br />

culture that supports<br />

innovative approaches<br />

– Develop a sound under- under- under-<br />

standing of the market<br />

needs and preferences<br />

– Address competition for<br />

resources and attention<br />

with other business areas<br />

– Metropolitan Life set up<br />

Cover2go as an innova- innova- innova-<br />

tion hub outside the<br />

headquarters with its own<br />

IT system and a mandate<br />

to innovate (Smith and<br />

Smit, 2010c)<br />

19.3 External outreach: Building market relations<br />

While establishing a solid internal platform, the focus must also include the<br />

external environment, particularly the client and the distribution channel.<br />

While alternative distribution (see Chapter 22) and client value (see Chapter 15)<br />

are covered in depth in other chapters, this section focuses on the special<br />

challenges faced by commercial insurers to industrialize and manage partnerships.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!