MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ... MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

10.12.2012 Views

412 Insurers and microinsurance 19.2.3 Structuring the business for scale Microinsurance initiatives have vast scale opportunities due to the size of the target population and the aggregation potential of distribution channels. With finetuning in the pilot phase, the focus will naturally turn to industrialization. When entering into microinsurance with new products, partners and processes, insurers often make use of skills, infrastructure and financial resources from other lines of business at the initial stage of the industrialization. However, this arrangement may not create an ideal fit and can jeopardize the success of the scheme. Iterative learning processes will continue into the industrialization phase as microinsurance initiatives are adapted on the basis of experience and feedback from the market (see Box 19.6). Matching traditional resources to a new business model Stable systems and processes are required to protect client data and to ensure compliance with underwriting and regulatory standards, and therefore resources are often sourced from the core business. For example, Old Mutual in South Africa created the Foundation Market department to serve low-income households, but until it can achieve scale and generate sufficient profits, this business unit remains financially and technically supported by other departments (see Chapter 18). 2 To achieve scale, a wider group of individuals comprising higherlevel managers, technical experts and operational staff need to be involved in developing microinsurance into an established business line. While product pricing may happen on an ad hoc basis for experiments and pilots, technical underwriting and actuarial resources are required when establishing a scalable initiative. As microinsurance grows, traditional insurance platforms will struggle to operate with the required efficiency and agility (see Box 19.7). Low-cost policies cannot support the same expense structures as traditional products. One multinational company in India found that it cost over US$20 to issue a policy – and that there would be no way to serve the microinsurance target group while carrying such a cost. To profitably reach ever further into the low-income market, products need to be highly cost-effective. To achieve this, some insurers invest a significant amount of time and effort into negotiating cost savings and making operational structures more efficient. As a result, drawing on traditional business resources may require significant “un-learning” and restructuring. Insurers need to prevent the growing initiative from being strangled by legacy systems and processes, such as inflexible information technology (IT) systems, and the staff responsible for them. Additionally, 2 Govindarajan and Trimble (2005) point out that this is the riskiest way to do things, but it is the natural tendency among established firms.

Teaching elephants to dance working with external sponsors and distribution partners requires that systems and operations respond fl exibly to diff erent partner requirements. Box 19.7 Microinsurance in multinational insurance companies Multinational companies off er specifi c opportunities and challenges for micro- micro- insurance. Th eir fi nancial strength and resources can allow strategic investments into longer-term opportunities and their strong international brands can provide motivation for more speculative investments to produce the social benefi ts or research for the public good. Additionally, their presence in many countries can help to transfer product and system innovations proven in one setting to others. Microinsurance experts based at head offi ce can contribute to building the global knowledge base, exercise thought leadership, and be a contact point for public or civil society organizations. On the downside, multinational insurers have plenty of competing priorities, especially in emerging markets. Th ey have also achieved suffi cient scale to break processes down into functional departments – gaining a comparative advantage and risk management benefi t, but creating barriers to agile adaptation. In com- panies fractured by product lines, functions (underwriting, claims, sales, IT) and geography, any initiative that aims to serve a new customer will have to either simultaneously coordinate all the elements of the company (in essence, have proxy authority of the CEO) or, more reasonably, change its ambition, or split off , as Christensen (2003) recommends. Working within the system will bring the budding microinsurance “intra- “intra- preneur” no end of interesting learning about his or her company. For example, one South African insurer intended to recruit a three-person team to run a microinsurance fi eld offi ce. In the insurer’s HR system, the lowest possible salary was hard-coded at level zero. For the microinsurance business model to work, the plan was to pay salaries at less than half of the level zero. As a result, the company could not hire the staff directly without changing the company’s entire compensa- tion plan – an obvious non-starter. Instead, the three staff were recruited using an outside agency, reducing their connection to the company and increasing cost. Th e emerging experiences of multinational insurance companies that are developing sizable microinsurance portfolios around the world show that it is profi table. To achieve this, and to develop their microinsurance activities activities system- atically, many global insurers have established special teams or or units to to advance the topic. topic. Some of these teams play a coordinating role in promoting microinsur- ance, setting quality standards and managing global global public relations and media activities. Other companies have a more active approach, with group-level employees employees that manage local pilots, product development and the acquisition of new distribution partners. 413

412 Insurers and microinsurance<br />

19.2.3 Structuring the business for scale<br />

<strong>Microinsurance</strong> initiatives have vast scale opportunities due to the size of the target<br />

population and the aggregation potential of distribution channels. With finetuning<br />

in the pilot phase, the focus will naturally turn to industrialization. When<br />

entering into microinsurance with new products, partners and processes, insurers<br />

often make use of skills, infrastructure and financial resources from other lines of<br />

business at the initial stage of the industrialization. However, this arrangement<br />

may not create an ideal fit and can jeopardize the success of the scheme. Iterative<br />

learning processes will continue into the industrialization phase as microinsurance<br />

initiatives are adapted on the basis of experience and feedback from the<br />

market (see Box 19.6).<br />

Matching traditional resources to a new business model<br />

Stable systems and processes are required to protect client data and to ensure<br />

compliance with underwriting and regulatory standards, and therefore resources<br />

are often sourced from the core business. For example, Old Mutual in South<br />

Africa created the Foundation Market department to serve low-income households,<br />

but until it can achieve scale and generate sufficient profits, this business<br />

unit remains financially and technically supported by other departments (see<br />

Chapter 18). 2 To achieve scale, a wider group of individuals comprising higherlevel<br />

managers, technical experts and operational staff need to be involved in<br />

developing microinsurance into an established business line. While product<br />

pricing may happen on an ad hoc basis for experiments and pilots, technical<br />

underwriting and actuarial resources are required when establishing a scalable<br />

initiative.<br />

As microinsurance grows, traditional insurance platforms will struggle to<br />

operate with the required efficiency and agility (see Box 19.7). Low-cost policies<br />

cannot support the same expense structures as traditional products. One multinational<br />

company in India found that it cost over US$20 to issue a policy – and<br />

that there would be no way to serve the microinsurance target group while carrying<br />

such a cost. To profitably reach ever further into the low-income market,<br />

products need to be highly cost-effective. To achieve this, some insurers invest a<br />

significant amount of time and effort into negotiating cost savings and making<br />

operational structures more efficient.<br />

As a result, drawing on traditional business resources may require significant<br />

“un-learning” and restructuring. Insurers need to prevent the growing initiative<br />

from being strangled by legacy systems and processes, such as inflexible information<br />

technology (IT) systems, and the staff responsible for them. Additionally,<br />

2 Govindarajan and Trimble (2005) point out that this is the riskiest way to do things, but it is the<br />

natural tendency among established firms.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!