10.12.2012 Views

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

384 Insurers and microinsurance<br />

between 80 per cent and 100 per cent seem to indicate that most of the insurers<br />

in this case study appear to have achieved this (as seen in Table 18.5).<br />

– Old Mutual’s distribution model requires agents to sell business in and around<br />

the community in which they live. This promotes a relationship of trust between<br />

the agents and the policyholders. This was an important factor in its growth,<br />

especially in the case of burial societies, which are community-centred. While<br />

Old Mutual has been able to reach a large number of lives using this model, the<br />

policy volumes do not support the costs of the salaried agents and there are other<br />

players in the South African market that have reached higher policy volumes<br />

using partnership distribution models, e.g. through church groups and retailers.<br />

– All the insurers have been involved in building the capacity of partners. Insurers<br />

helped partners set up infrastructure and systems to achieve efficiency in processes<br />

and ease of flow of information between the insurer and the partner.<br />

Affordability and competitiveness of premiums<br />

Setting premiums at a level that is appropriate for this market is critical. It is<br />

often difficult to balance provision of the benefits demanded by the market with<br />

premium affordability and financial viability. The insurers in the case studies<br />

handled the issue of affordable premiums in the following ways:<br />

– For the life cover and weather products, the insurers deal with the issue of affordability<br />

of premiums by offering products with limited benefits.<br />

– Old Mutual and ASR introduced a range of benefit-level options to allow customers<br />

to select an affordable price point, while the cover level is still of value.<br />

For Old Mutual this was in response to a finding that a number of burial societies<br />

were lapsing as they were forced to select options that were too expensive.<br />

– Flexibility in premium payment options is important. ASR allows for monthly,<br />

quarterly or annual payment of premiums. By contrast, CIC indicated that its<br />

annual premium payment for the Bima ya Jamii product was too expensive for<br />

many prospective clients.<br />

– Competitiveness of premiums is an important issue in the group funeral insurance<br />

market in South Africa. The premium amount is often a key consideration<br />

in the selection of an insurer for the larger funeral parlours and burial societies.<br />

To remain competitive, Old Mutual has had to maintain premiums at a lower<br />

level than that which would support the high cost of distribution of the initiative<br />

until business volumes reach a commercially viable level. This fiercely competitive<br />

environment was not found in the other case studies, but may become an<br />

issue as more players enter the various markets.<br />

– The difficulty in reconciling provision of the benefits demanded by the market<br />

with premium affordability and financial viability is illustrated by the experience<br />

of CIC with the bundled health product. CIC expanded benefits on the bundled

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!