MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ... MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

10.12.2012 Views

368 18 Is microinsurance a profitable business for insurance companies? Janice Angove and Nashelo Tande This chapter is adapted from Microinsurance Paper No. 11, published by the ILO’s Microinsurance Innovation Facility. The authors express their gratitude to the insurers for their participation in the case studies. They would like to sincerely thank Guillermo Lopez from Aseguradora Rural (Guatemala), Anne Wambui from CIC (Kenya), Rakesh Jain from ICICI Lombard (India), Gema O Cheng from Malayan Insurance (Philippines) and Colette Patience from Old Mutual (South Africa). They would like to acknowledge the valuable input from Yogesh Gupta from Allianz (India) and his general insights on the profitability of microinsurance. They also extend their thanks to Arman Oza and Maud Monget, who conducted the research for the case studies of ICICI Lombard and Aseguradora Rural respectively. They also thank Alexander Thomson from Quindiem Consulting for contributing the analytical framework and Doug Lacey for his valuable guidance and insights during the project. The authors wish to convey special thanks to Richard Leftley (MicroEnsure), Brandon Mathews (Zurich), Michael McCord (MicroInsurance Centre) and Kelly Rendek (actuarial consultant) for their valuable insights and useful comments. We would like to thank Aparna Dalal for her work in editing this chapter. The question “Under what circumstances can insurance companies generate profits from microinsurance?” is important, because in many markets insurers are showing an increasing interest in expanding into the low-income market. To maintain the involvement of commercial players in this market, microinsurance needs to contribute to the overall profitability of the insurer and generate value for its shareholders. Profits over time must be sufficient to justify the investment required to support the development of the business. This paper presents a case study analysis of the profitability of microinsurance provided by five insurers operating in different regions across the globe. – Co-operative Insurance Company (CIC) in Kenya offers a compulsory credit life product and Bima Ya Jamii, a bundled voluntary health and life cover. – Old Mutual in South Africa offers a group funeral cover. – ICICI Lombard in India offers Manipal Arogya Suraksha Yojana (MAS), a groupbased health insurance product, as well as crop cover based on rainfall index. – Aseguradora Rural (ASR) in Guatemala offers a death and disability cover as well as a student cover, which provides a life policy with an additional health cover. – Malayan Insurance in the Philippines offers a life cover with additional benefits such as fire assistance. Although the experiences in these case studies are unique, the challenges and successes of these microinsurance initiatives provide insights into possible approaches to improving viability for other players in the market. This chapter considers exclusively the commercial viability of microinsurance, but there are other reasons for insurers to target the low-income market (see

Is microinsurance a profitable business for insurance companies? 369 Chapter 19). Most evident from the case studies are social objectives to improve quality of life for the poor. Given the importance and prevalence of social objectives, a complete review should factor in an initiative’s client value proposition (see Chapter 15). The question of profitability needs to be balanced with the extent to which products provide value to the client, because long-term sustainability depends on the value proposition. Despite the social motivation, it is important that microinsurance be viable to maintain the involvement of insurers. The case studies indicate that micro insurance can be profitable. However, there are instances where the insurers have found it difficult to establish a profitable initiative and have engaged in an iterative process of restructuring it to achieve profitability. For the most part, the insurers have not formally monitored the costs associated with microinsurance. As a result, expenses were allocated using a proportional method, where the management costs of the relevant business segment or overall company were allocated to the microinsurance business on the basis of premium volumes. It is possible that if the costs were more accurately allocated to microinsurance, expense ratios would be higher. As business grows, it will become more important for insurers to monitor expenses accurately to better understand the commercial viability of microinsurance. The chapter is organized as follows. Section 18.1 provides an overview of the framework and drivers of profitability. Section 18.2 sets out the context for the insurers, the sector they operate in and their microinsurance initiatives. Financial analysis and an examination of the drivers of profitability for each of the microinsurance initiatives are outlined in section 18.3. Section 18.4 concludes with the main findings from the case studies and recommends areas for future research. 18.1 Framework for the assessment of profitability Table 18.1 provides an overview of the framework developed to assess the profitability of microinsurance, which includes three main drivers of profitability: achieving scale, managing claims costs, and managing acquisition and administration costs. The two aspects at the base of the diagram cut across the drivers of profitability and form the foundation needed for successful initiatives.

368<br />

18 Is microinsurance a profitable business<br />

for insurance companies?<br />

Janice Angove and Nashelo Tande<br />

This chapter is adapted from <strong>Microinsurance</strong> Paper No. 11, published by the ILO’s <strong>Microinsurance</strong> Innovation<br />

Facility. The authors express their gratitude to the insurers for their participation in the case studies. They would<br />

like to sincerely thank Guillermo Lopez from Aseguradora Rural (Guatemala), Anne Wambui from CIC (Kenya),<br />

Rakesh Jain from ICICI Lombard (India), Gema O Cheng from Malayan Insurance (Philippines) and Colette<br />

Patience from Old Mutual (South Africa). They would like to acknowledge the valuable input from Yogesh<br />

Gupta from Allianz (India) and his general insights on the profitability of microinsurance. They also extend<br />

their thanks to Arman Oza and Maud Monget, who conducted the research for the case studies of ICICI Lombard<br />

and Aseguradora Rural respectively. They also thank Alexander Thomson from Quindiem Consulting for<br />

contributing the analytical framework and Doug Lacey for his valuable guidance and insights during the<br />

project. The authors wish to convey special thanks to Richard Leftley (MicroEnsure), Brandon Mathews (Zurich),<br />

Michael McCord (MicroInsurance Centre) and Kelly Rendek (actuarial consultant) for their valuable insights<br />

and useful comments. We would like to thank Aparna Dalal for her work in editing this chapter.<br />

The question “Under what circumstances can insurance companies generate<br />

profits from microinsurance?” is important, because in many markets insurers<br />

are showing an increasing interest in expanding into the low-income market. To<br />

maintain the involvement of commercial players in this market, microinsurance<br />

needs to contribute to the overall profitability of the insurer and generate value<br />

for its shareholders. Profits over time must be sufficient to justify the investment<br />

required to support the development of the business.<br />

This paper presents a case study analysis of the profitability of microinsurance<br />

provided by five insurers operating in different regions across the globe.<br />

– Co-operative Insurance Company (CIC) in Kenya offers a compulsory<br />

credit life product and Bima Ya Jamii, a bundled voluntary health and life cover.<br />

– Old Mutual in South Africa offers a group funeral cover.<br />

– ICICI Lombard in India offers Manipal Arogya Suraksha Yojana (MAS), a groupbased<br />

health insurance product, as well as crop cover based on rainfall index.<br />

– Aseguradora Rural (ASR) in Guatemala offers a death and disability cover as<br />

well as a student cover, which provides a life policy with an additional health<br />

cover.<br />

– Malayan Insurance in the Philippines offers a life cover with additional benefits<br />

such as fire assistance.<br />

Although the experiences in these case studies are unique, the challenges and successes<br />

of these microinsurance initiatives provide insights into possible approaches<br />

to improving viability for other players in the market.<br />

This chapter considers exclusively the commercial viability of microinsurance,<br />

but there are other reasons for insurers to target the low-income market (see

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!