MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...
MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ... MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...
368 18 Is microinsurance a profitable business for insurance companies? Janice Angove and Nashelo Tande This chapter is adapted from Microinsurance Paper No. 11, published by the ILO’s Microinsurance Innovation Facility. The authors express their gratitude to the insurers for their participation in the case studies. They would like to sincerely thank Guillermo Lopez from Aseguradora Rural (Guatemala), Anne Wambui from CIC (Kenya), Rakesh Jain from ICICI Lombard (India), Gema O Cheng from Malayan Insurance (Philippines) and Colette Patience from Old Mutual (South Africa). They would like to acknowledge the valuable input from Yogesh Gupta from Allianz (India) and his general insights on the profitability of microinsurance. They also extend their thanks to Arman Oza and Maud Monget, who conducted the research for the case studies of ICICI Lombard and Aseguradora Rural respectively. They also thank Alexander Thomson from Quindiem Consulting for contributing the analytical framework and Doug Lacey for his valuable guidance and insights during the project. The authors wish to convey special thanks to Richard Leftley (MicroEnsure), Brandon Mathews (Zurich), Michael McCord (MicroInsurance Centre) and Kelly Rendek (actuarial consultant) for their valuable insights and useful comments. We would like to thank Aparna Dalal for her work in editing this chapter. The question “Under what circumstances can insurance companies generate profits from microinsurance?” is important, because in many markets insurers are showing an increasing interest in expanding into the low-income market. To maintain the involvement of commercial players in this market, microinsurance needs to contribute to the overall profitability of the insurer and generate value for its shareholders. Profits over time must be sufficient to justify the investment required to support the development of the business. This paper presents a case study analysis of the profitability of microinsurance provided by five insurers operating in different regions across the globe. – Co-operative Insurance Company (CIC) in Kenya offers a compulsory credit life product and Bima Ya Jamii, a bundled voluntary health and life cover. – Old Mutual in South Africa offers a group funeral cover. – ICICI Lombard in India offers Manipal Arogya Suraksha Yojana (MAS), a groupbased health insurance product, as well as crop cover based on rainfall index. – Aseguradora Rural (ASR) in Guatemala offers a death and disability cover as well as a student cover, which provides a life policy with an additional health cover. – Malayan Insurance in the Philippines offers a life cover with additional benefits such as fire assistance. Although the experiences in these case studies are unique, the challenges and successes of these microinsurance initiatives provide insights into possible approaches to improving viability for other players in the market. This chapter considers exclusively the commercial viability of microinsurance, but there are other reasons for insurers to target the low-income market (see
Is microinsurance a profitable business for insurance companies? 369 Chapter 19). Most evident from the case studies are social objectives to improve quality of life for the poor. Given the importance and prevalence of social objectives, a complete review should factor in an initiative’s client value proposition (see Chapter 15). The question of profitability needs to be balanced with the extent to which products provide value to the client, because long-term sustainability depends on the value proposition. Despite the social motivation, it is important that microinsurance be viable to maintain the involvement of insurers. The case studies indicate that micro insurance can be profitable. However, there are instances where the insurers have found it difficult to establish a profitable initiative and have engaged in an iterative process of restructuring it to achieve profitability. For the most part, the insurers have not formally monitored the costs associated with microinsurance. As a result, expenses were allocated using a proportional method, where the management costs of the relevant business segment or overall company were allocated to the microinsurance business on the basis of premium volumes. It is possible that if the costs were more accurately allocated to microinsurance, expense ratios would be higher. As business grows, it will become more important for insurers to monitor expenses accurately to better understand the commercial viability of microinsurance. The chapter is organized as follows. Section 18.1 provides an overview of the framework and drivers of profitability. Section 18.2 sets out the context for the insurers, the sector they operate in and their microinsurance initiatives. Financial analysis and an examination of the drivers of profitability for each of the microinsurance initiatives are outlined in section 18.3. Section 18.4 concludes with the main findings from the case studies and recommends areas for future research. 18.1 Framework for the assessment of profitability Table 18.1 provides an overview of the framework developed to assess the profitability of microinsurance, which includes three main drivers of profitability: achieving scale, managing claims costs, and managing acquisition and administration costs. The two aspects at the base of the diagram cut across the drivers of profitability and form the foundation needed for successful initiatives.
- Page 340 and 341: 318 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 342 and 343: 320 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 344 and 345: 322 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 346 and 347: 324 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 348 and 349: 326 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 350 and 351: 328 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 352 and 353: 330 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 354 and 355: 332 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 356 and 357: 334 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 358 and 359: 336 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 360 and 361: 338 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 362 and 363: 340 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 364 and 365: 342 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 366 and 367: 344 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 368 and 369: 346 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 370 and 371: 16.4.4 Donors 348 Insurance and the
- Page 372 and 373: 350 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 374 and 375: 352 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 376 and 377: 354 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 378 and 379: 356 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 380 and 381: 358 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 382 and 383: 360 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 384 and 385: 362 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 386 and 387: 364 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 389: VI Insurers and microinsurance 367
- Page 393 and 394: Is microinsurance a profitable busi
- Page 395 and 396: Is microinsurance a profitable busi
- Page 397 and 398: Is microinsurance a profitable busi
- Page 399 and 400: Is microinsurance a profi table bus
- Page 401 and 402: Is microinsurance a profitable busi
- Page 403 and 404: Is microinsurance a profi table bus
- Page 405 and 406: Is microinsurance a profitable busi
- Page 407 and 408: Is microinsurance a profi table bus
- Page 409 and 410: Is microinsurance a profi table bus
- Page 411 and 412: Is microinsurance a profi table bus
- Page 413 and 414: Is microinsurance a profi table bus
- Page 415 and 416: Is microinsurance a profitable busi
- Page 417 and 418: Is microinsurance a profitable busi
- Page 419 and 420: Is microinsurance a profitable busi
- Page 421 and 422: 19 Teaching elephants to dance: The
- Page 423 and 424: Teaching elephants to dance - New e
- Page 425 and 426: Teaching elephants to dance 19.1.2
- Page 427 and 428: Teaching elephants to dance Box 19.
- Page 429 and 430: Teaching elephants to dance 19.2.1
- Page 431 and 432: Teaching elephants to dance 409 the
- Page 433 and 434: Teaching elephants to dance fl exib
- Page 435 and 436: Teaching elephants to dance working
- Page 437 and 438: Teaching elephants to dance 19.3.1
- Page 439 and 440: Teaching elephants to dance way can
368<br />
18 Is microinsurance a profitable business<br />
for insurance companies?<br />
Janice Angove and Nashelo Tande<br />
This chapter is adapted from <strong>Microinsurance</strong> Paper No. 11, published by the ILO’s <strong>Microinsurance</strong> Innovation<br />
Facility. The authors express their gratitude to the insurers for their participation in the case studies. They would<br />
like to sincerely thank Guillermo Lopez from Aseguradora Rural (Guatemala), Anne Wambui from CIC (Kenya),<br />
Rakesh Jain from ICICI Lombard (India), Gema O Cheng from Malayan Insurance (Philippines) and Colette<br />
Patience from Old Mutual (South Africa). They would like to acknowledge the valuable input from Yogesh<br />
Gupta from Allianz (India) and his general insights on the profitability of microinsurance. They also extend<br />
their thanks to Arman Oza and Maud Monget, who conducted the research for the case studies of ICICI Lombard<br />
and Aseguradora Rural respectively. They also thank Alexander Thomson from Quindiem Consulting for<br />
contributing the analytical framework and Doug Lacey for his valuable guidance and insights during the<br />
project. The authors wish to convey special thanks to Richard Leftley (MicroEnsure), Brandon Mathews (Zurich),<br />
Michael McCord (MicroInsurance Centre) and Kelly Rendek (actuarial consultant) for their valuable insights<br />
and useful comments. We would like to thank Aparna Dalal for her work in editing this chapter.<br />
The question “Under what circumstances can insurance companies generate<br />
profits from microinsurance?” is important, because in many markets insurers<br />
are showing an increasing interest in expanding into the low-income market. To<br />
maintain the involvement of commercial players in this market, microinsurance<br />
needs to contribute to the overall profitability of the insurer and generate value<br />
for its shareholders. Profits over time must be sufficient to justify the investment<br />
required to support the development of the business.<br />
This paper presents a case study analysis of the profitability of microinsurance<br />
provided by five insurers operating in different regions across the globe.<br />
– Co-operative Insurance Company (CIC) in Kenya offers a compulsory<br />
credit life product and Bima Ya Jamii, a bundled voluntary health and life cover.<br />
– Old Mutual in South Africa offers a group funeral cover.<br />
– ICICI Lombard in India offers Manipal Arogya Suraksha Yojana (MAS), a groupbased<br />
health insurance product, as well as crop cover based on rainfall index.<br />
– Aseguradora Rural (ASR) in Guatemala offers a death and disability cover as<br />
well as a student cover, which provides a life policy with an additional health<br />
cover.<br />
– Malayan Insurance in the Philippines offers a life cover with additional benefits<br />
such as fire assistance.<br />
Although the experiences in these case studies are unique, the challenges and successes<br />
of these microinsurance initiatives provide insights into possible approaches<br />
to improving viability for other players in the market.<br />
This chapter considers exclusively the commercial viability of microinsurance,<br />
but there are other reasons for insurers to target the low-income market (see