10.12.2012 Views

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Microinsurance</strong> that works for women<br />

shock is not due to receive her payout (WWB, 2006d). Other informal reciprocal<br />

social relationships are also unable to provide full cover for many risks. In the<br />

earlier example from Nepal, contributions from community members were<br />

found to cover only 25 per cent of the costs associated with the death of a family<br />

member (Simkhada et al., 2000). Social relationships may also provide little protection<br />

from covariant risks, such as natural disasters or health epidemics,<br />

because others may be facing similar problems, limiting their ability to help.<br />

Adverse secondary implications<br />

Several risk strategies, while sometimes effective in the short term, can lead to<br />

enduring adverse secondary implications, perpetuating a cycle of poverty for<br />

poor women and their households. Allocating business profits to savings instead<br />

of investment, for example, is one of the main reasons for women’s businesses<br />

failing to grow to the same extent as men’s businesses (Murray, 2008). Accumulating<br />

precautionary savings can also limit expenditure on other vital needs such<br />

as housing or education. Other risk-averse business practices, such as diversification<br />

into a number of smaller businesses, may reduce the impact of any one business<br />

failing, yet limit each business’s chance of succeeding. These risk-averse<br />

choices cause poor women to forgo some profitable opportunities that might<br />

have helped them break the cycle of poverty (Dercon and Kirchberger, 2008).<br />

When a woman copes with shocks by selling productive assets such as livestock<br />

or equipment, she may be forced to accept a below-market price out of desperation.<br />

Regardless, she wipes out her ability to earn income from the assets in<br />

the future. Similarly, pulling children out of school may reduce immediate<br />

household costs and free up children’s time to work, but it causes a serious loss to<br />

children’s development and severely curtails their long-term earning potential.<br />

Reducing food intake and medical expenses similarly can have a serious health<br />

impact on the household. Research from the recent economic crisis indicates that<br />

women and girls suffer disproportionately from these cutbacks (Institute of<br />

Development Studies, 2009).<br />

Borrowing may help to smooth financial needs in the short term, but may<br />

lead to long-term indebtedness (Simkhada et al., 2000). Defaulting on existing<br />

loans may free up short-term cash, but may result in a future loss of access to<br />

finance. Figure 16.2 illustrates how many of the aforementioned risk strategies<br />

can fail the woman who employs them (Dercon and Kirchberger, 2008).<br />

339

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!