MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...
MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ... MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...
332 Insurance and the low-income market unique and pressing need for appropriate means to manage risk, but also serve as agents for the risk management of their entire families. Poor women have traditionally coped with risk using approaches that offer moderate protection, but are frequently limited, inefficient, unreliable, or even harmful. Microinsurance offers a promising solution for poor women if it is designed and delivered effectively. Women form a significant segment of the emerging microinsurance market because they seek cover both for themselves and their families, serving as risk managers for entire households. Nonetheless, millions of poor women are uninsured. This chapter highlights the importance of understanding the specific risks that poor women face and the influence of household dynamics on the ways those risks are managed. With those insights, the chapter explores how microinsurance can be better designed and delivered for women. It also serves as a call to action to MFIs 1 and other delivery channels, as well as to donors, insurers and the research community, to develop gender-sensitive microinsurance schemes. Findings for this paper are primarily drawn from qualitative market research studies conducted by Women’s World Banking (WWB) from 2003 to 2008 in eight countries spanning Africa, Eastern Europe, Latin America, the Middle East and South Asia and the existing literature on savings and microinsurance. 16.1 Gender and risk in poor households How do risk management decisions and strategies differ between women and men? Although there are differences across cultures, in general men often fill the roles of provider, authority figure and head of household, and are usually responsible for making major financial decisions. Women often fill the roles of caregiver, homemaker, and increasingly, income earner and household financial manager. Inherent to caregiving is the responsibility of coping with risks – such as health problems, deaths in the family and emergencies – to maintain the security, health and stability of the home. These roles give rise to different risk management strategies for women and men, which can be explored from three perspectives described below. First, women’s attitudes to savings, risk-aversion and financial management often differ from those of men. Second, there are some risks that arise for women as a result of intra-household relations. Finally, women have a heightened vulnerability to risks due to their physiology and position in the household and society. 1 This chapter focuses primarily on microfinance institutions as delivery channels.
Microinsurance that works for women 16.1.1 Women’s attitudes to risk management Women are keen savers and risk managers. Women typically utilize their earnings to improve the care and standard of living in their households by either spending business profits on household expenses or saving them to draw upon in case of need. This behaviour relates to women’s role as caregivers and suggests that, if women are providing for the day-to-day needs of the family, it frees up men’s resources to invest and expand their businesses. In this sense their roles are interdependent. A Pakistani man reveals: “Women use [their income] in the house, they think about the children. They save money for the dowry or the education of the children. That is what women do. Men want to expand their business” (WWB, 2008c). Evidence from developed countries suggests that women are more risk-averse than men in investment (Jianakoplos and Bernasek, 1998). However, differences in risk-aversion may not be biological or innate but rather arise from the traditional roles within the household and the different degrees of risks that women and men face. Whether these differences arise from innate preferences or from gendered contexts, women and men do manage risks differently, and this has implications for microinsurance product design. 16.1.2 Intra-household relations and risk management Some households operate with significant joint decision-making and negotiation. In others, there may be a strong separation of roles, with little discussion or collaboration, or there may be latent or overt conflict in which some members, usually women, feel that they are seeking to fulfil their responsibilities in spite of their spouses. In the latter cases men may offer little assistance, withdraw their contributions when women earn their own income or make demands on women’s savings and incomes for their own purposes. In the worst cases, conflict may lead to domestic violence and divorce. How a household operates significantly impacts resource allocation to saving and insurance. Where cooperation is strong, joint decisions to mobilize funds for insurance may be made more easily. In households where roles are clearly separated or where there is conflict, these decisions are more likely to be problematic. In these cases, women who desire to purchase policies that respond to the needs ascribed to their role – for example, health care for children – may have to draw on their own, usually lower, levels of income and savings. The very existence of household conflict may also increase a woman’s desire to buy insurance and affect the features she chooses. Awareness of such intra-household gender dynamics will enable the design and delivery of microinsurance products to be improved. 333
- Page 304 and 305: 282 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 306 and 307: 284 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 308 and 309: 286 14 Emerging practices in consum
- Page 310 and 311: 288 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 312 and 313: 290 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 314 and 315: 292 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 316 and 317: 294 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 318 and 319: 296 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 320 and 321: 298 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 322 and 323: 300 15 Improving client value: Insi
- Page 324 and 325: 302 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 326 and 327: 304 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 328 and 329: 306 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 330 and 331: 308 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 332 and 333: 310 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 334 and 335: 312 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 336 and 337: 314 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 338 and 339: 316 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 340 and 341: 318 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 342 and 343: 320 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 344 and 345: 322 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 346 and 347: 324 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 348 and 349: 326 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 350 and 351: 328 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 352 and 353: 330 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 356 and 357: 334 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 358 and 359: 336 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 360 and 361: 338 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 362 and 363: 340 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 364 and 365: 342 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 366 and 367: 344 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 368 and 369: 346 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 370 and 371: 16.4.4 Donors 348 Insurance and the
- Page 372 and 373: 350 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 374 and 375: 352 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 376 and 377: 354 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 378 and 379: 356 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 380 and 381: 358 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 382 and 383: 360 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 384 and 385: 362 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 386 and 387: 364 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 389 and 390: VI Insurers and microinsurance 367
- Page 391 and 392: Is microinsurance a profitable busi
- Page 393 and 394: Is microinsurance a profitable busi
- Page 395 and 396: Is microinsurance a profitable busi
- Page 397 and 398: Is microinsurance a profitable busi
- Page 399 and 400: Is microinsurance a profi table bus
- Page 401 and 402: Is microinsurance a profitable busi
- Page 403 and 404: Is microinsurance a profi table bus
<strong>Microinsurance</strong> that works for women<br />
16.1.1 Women’s attitudes to risk management<br />
Women are keen savers and risk managers. Women typically utilize their earnings<br />
to improve the care and standard of living in their households by either<br />
spending business profits on household expenses or saving them to draw upon in<br />
case of need. This behaviour relates to women’s role as caregivers and suggests<br />
that, if women are providing for the day-to-day needs of the family, it frees up<br />
men’s resources to invest and expand their businesses. In this sense their roles are<br />
interdependent. A Pakistani man reveals: “Women use [their income] in the<br />
house, they think about the children. They save money for the dowry or the<br />
education of the children. That is what women do. Men want to expand their<br />
business” (WWB, 2008c).<br />
Evidence from developed countries suggests that women are more risk-averse<br />
than men in investment (Jianakoplos and Bernasek, 1998). However, differences<br />
in risk-aversion may not be biological or innate but rather arise from the traditional<br />
roles within the household and the different degrees of risks that women<br />
and men face. Whether these differences arise from innate preferences or from<br />
gendered contexts, women and men do manage risks differently, and this has<br />
implications for microinsurance product design.<br />
16.1.2 Intra-household relations and risk management<br />
Some households operate with significant joint decision-making and negotiation.<br />
In others, there may be a strong separation of roles, with little discussion or<br />
collaboration, or there may be latent or overt conflict in which some members,<br />
usually women, feel that they are seeking to fulfil their responsibilities in spite of<br />
their spouses. In the latter cases men may offer little assistance, withdraw their<br />
contributions when women earn their own income or make demands on<br />
women’s savings and incomes for their own purposes. In the worst cases, conflict<br />
may lead to domestic violence and divorce.<br />
How a household operates significantly impacts resource allocation to saving<br />
and insurance. Where cooperation is strong, joint decisions to mobilize funds for<br />
insurance may be made more easily. In households where roles are clearly<br />
separated or where there is conflict, these decisions are more likely to be<br />
problematic. In these cases, women who desire to purchase policies that respond<br />
to the needs ascribed to their role – for example, health care for children – may<br />
have to draw on their own, usually lower, levels of income and savings. The very<br />
existence of household conflict may also increase a woman’s desire to buy<br />
insurance and affect the features she chooses. Awareness of such intra-household<br />
gender dynamics will enable the design and delivery of microinsurance products<br />
to be improved.<br />
333