10.12.2012 Views

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

322 Insurance and the low-income market<br />

(Uplift), by NGOs in partnership with insurers (PWDS, VimoSEWA), by an<br />

insurance company in collaboration with the Ministry of Textiles (ICICI Lombard),<br />

by a state Government in collaboration with cooperatives (Yeshasvini),<br />

and by the Government with various private insurers (RSBY). 5 The RSBY and<br />

weavers’ schemes are subsidized and the latter is the only one offering full outpatient<br />

cover. It may seem unfair to compare subsidized schemes to market-priced<br />

ones, but those comparisons make sense from the clients’ perspective, which is<br />

the essence of the PACE assessment. The products serve similar target groups,<br />

but are sold in different locations (with the exception of RSBY, which has been<br />

rolled out across India).<br />

The government-sponsored schemes score similarly to their Kenyan counterpart<br />

NHIF (see Figure 15.5). Although they can provide better products at a lower<br />

cost due to subsidies, as large-scale schemes they underperform on both access<br />

and experience dimensions. For RSBY, access is limited to the population below<br />

the poverty line (BPL) as identified by the ration card. More importantly, enrolment<br />

numbers are suppressed by the fact that enrolment is often done within a<br />

specific window of time and all family members need to be present in person.<br />

Limited information provided to the public and limited effort to educate members<br />

are likely explanations for low usage rates. In the case of ICICI Lombard,<br />

access to its scheme is constrained by limited member education for a relatively<br />

complex product. Low usage rates may suggest inadequate claims procedures,<br />

but an emerging “cashless” system should improve service quality in the near<br />

future. The Government of India and the insurers involved are investing<br />

resources to make the RSBY and other government-sponsored schemes work for<br />

low-income populations.<br />

Improvements in the access and experience dimensions might make it difficult<br />

for market-priced schemes to compete with RSBY and other government<br />

schemes, at least for the poorest clients. Some households are currently still<br />

enrolled in RSBY and other health microinsurance plans, but it seems that<br />

schemes will in future align themselves with RSBY and reposition their products.<br />

Organizations like Uplift, VimoSEWA and PWDS can improve access to RSBY<br />

and make sure that their members benefit from the government system.<br />

5 Various public and private insurers deliver RSBY; premiums vary slightly, but the product design and<br />

core processes remain the same. For the PACE analysis, the RSBY delivered in collaboration with<br />

ICICI Lombard is taken as a reference. For more information on RSBY and health microinsurance in<br />

India, see Chapter 20, section 20.2.4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!