MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...
MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ... MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...
258 12 Livestock insurance: Helping vulnerable livestock keepers manage their risk Anupama Sharma and Andrew Mude The authors wish to thank various reviewers for their comments and guidance, including Iddo Dror (Micro Insurance Academy), Brian Foster (consultant), K. Gopinath (IFFCO Tokio), Joachim Herbold (Munich Re), Florian Mayr (Munich Re), Pranav Prashad (ILO), Dirk Reinhard (Munich Re Foundation), Rupalee Ruchismita (CIRM) and an anonymous reviewer. Livestock accounts for 40 per cent of global agricultural output and supports the livelihood and food security of over one billion people (FAO, 2009). A livestockrelated livelihood represents a way out of poverty for a significant number of the world’s poor. However, the poor still face a number of risks when they strive to access the benefits of the growing and vibrant livestock sector. Reducing the inherent vulnerability of people dependent on livestock in smallholder production systems has been the central motivation of livestock insurance targeting poor or vulnerable populations. While some countries, such as India, have significant experience with livestock insurance for the poor, improvements in the provision of insurance products, as well as innovations in their design, are fuelling interest in the potential of insurance to reduce the vulnerability of the poor to the risks associated with a livestock livelihood. A growing recognition of the importance of risk management as a key pillar of any poverty-reducing strategy (Pica et al., 2008), coupled with a complex, evolving livestock economy that offers opportunities for the poor, provides a foundation upon which livestock insurance may flourish. This chapter highlights experiences that have offered valuable lessons on the potential benefits of livestock insurance, analyses the reasons for the failure of some insurance products and examines the conditions required for the successful implementation of a livestock insurance product. Section 12.1 illustrates the significance of the livestock economy globally and discusses the importance of managing the livestock risks to improve well-being in rural environments. Section 12.2 draws attention to a sample of livestock insurance experiments across the globe and summarizes the experience gained with them. Section 12.3 underlines the common challenges that many livestock insurance pilots face. By highlighting new innovations in insurance design and provision, section 12.4 discusses various opportunities that can help counter the obstacles to livestock insurance. 12.1 Why livestock insurance? Livestock plays an important role in the livelihood of the poor. It serves as both a source of income and a source of productive wealth that the poor can
Table 12.1 Livestock insurance expect to rely on for future income fl ows. It is also one of the few assets readily available to the poor, and especially to women, who have greater diffi culty accessing other productive livelihood opportunities (FAO, 2009). It is estimated that close to one billion people, or about 70 per cent of the world’s 1.4 billion people living in extreme poverty, depend on livestock for their livelihoods (Delgado et al., 1999). Although the livestock revolution represents a powerful vehicle for channelling pro-poor growth (IFAD, 2004; Th ornton et al., 2008; FAO, 2009) a major hindrance to the poor’s engagement in livestock production is their high degree of vulnerability to the many sources of mortality, morbidity and other risks that pervade the livestock production and marketing chain. Any disease, accident or theft of livestock leads to a substantial loss for the household. In addition, huge production risks associated with dairy activities render animal husbandry a risky proposition for low-income households. Th e production risks can relate to a scarcity of input such as fodder or water for the animals, the high morbidity of individual animals or an epidemic (see Table 12.1). Th e tropical climate and poor hygienic conditions pertaining in many developing countries are some of the factors that trigger or aggravate diseases such as mastitis, foot and mouth disease (FMD) and haemorrhagic septicaemia. Types of risk in livestock livelihoods Production risk Price risk Death, accidental and natural Weak rural infrastructure, e.g. roads, temperature-controlled supply chain Disease: – High morbidity due to epidemics and variable risks – Stoppage of milk production due to diseases such as mastitis and FMD Problems in input supply: – Lack of dry and green fodder for animals – Lack of water during droughts causing stress Animal death is the biggest risk for poor cattle owners. Since animals often represent a major asset for a low-income household, perhaps even its most valuable asset, their death can cause a signifi cant decline in the household’s net worth, not to mention a fall in income and productive output. If the animal has been purchased through a loan, the household may have a debt on an asset it no longer owns. 259 Fluctuations in cost of livestock and products
- Page 230 and 231: 208 Life insurance 9.4.1 Enhanced l
- Page 232 and 233: 210 Life insurance An enhancement f
- Page 234 and 235: 212 Life insurance 9.5.1 Period of
- Page 236 and 237: 214 Life insurance The focus of ins
- Page 238 and 239: 216 Life insurance Insurers and len
- Page 240 and 241: 218 Life insurance Box 10.1 Mapping
- Page 242 and 243: 220 Life insurance Living in the sh
- Page 244 and 245: Table 10.1 222 Life insurance Copin
- Page 246 and 247: 224 Life insurance 10.2.2 Is it ins
- Page 248 and 249: 226 Life insurance such other tangi
- Page 250 and 251: 228 Life insurance “Sold, not bou
- Page 252 and 253: 230 Life insurance While funeral pa
- Page 254 and 255: 232 Life insurance case of funeral
- Page 256 and 257: 234 Life insurance 1. Protecta Clas
- Page 258 and 259: 236 Life insurance 5. It makes busi
- Page 260 and 261: 238 11 Designed for development imp
- Page 262 and 263: 240 General insurance For reasons t
- Page 264 and 265: 242 General insurance Once an indem
- Page 266 and 267: 244 General insurance 11.1.3 Option
- Page 268 and 269: 246 General insurance possible inde
- Page 270 and 271: 248 General insurance Conducting a
- Page 272 and 273: 250 General insurance costs and the
- Page 274 and 275: 252 General insurance the most risk
- Page 276 and 277: 254 General insurance from competit
- Page 278 and 279: 256 General insurance Th is factor,
- Page 282 and 283: 260 General insurance Depending on
- Page 284 and 285: 262 General insurance cultural poli
- Page 286 and 287: 264 General insurance 12.3 Difficul
- Page 288 and 289: 266 General insurance Improved iden
- Page 290 and 291: Table 12.4 268 General insurance In
- Page 292 and 293: 270 General insurance Table 12.5 Pa
- Page 294 and 295: 272 General insurance require tappi
- Page 296 and 297: 274 13 The psychology of microinsur
- Page 298 and 299: 276 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 300 and 301: 278 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 302 and 303: 280 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 304 and 305: 282 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 306 and 307: 284 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 308 and 309: 286 14 Emerging practices in consum
- Page 310 and 311: 288 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 312 and 313: 290 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 314 and 315: 292 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 316 and 317: 294 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 318 and 319: 296 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 320 and 321: 298 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 322 and 323: 300 15 Improving client value: Insi
- Page 324 and 325: 302 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 326 and 327: 304 Insurance and the low-income ma
- Page 328 and 329: 306 Insurance and the low-income ma
Table 12.1<br />
Livestock insurance<br />
expect to rely on for future income fl ows. It is also one of the few assets readily<br />
available to the poor, and especially to women, who have greater diffi culty<br />
accessing other productive livelihood opportunities (FAO, 2009). It is<br />
estimated that close to one billion people, or about 70 per cent of the world’s<br />
1.4 billion people living in extreme poverty, depend on livestock for their livelihoods<br />
(Delgado et al., 1999).<br />
Although the livestock revolution represents a powerful vehicle for channelling<br />
pro-poor growth (IFAD, 2004; Th ornton et al., 2008; FAO, 2009) a major<br />
hindrance to the poor’s engagement in livestock production is their high degree<br />
of vulnerability to the many sources of mortality, morbidity and other risks that<br />
pervade the livestock production and marketing chain. Any disease, accident or<br />
theft of livestock leads to a substantial loss for the household. In addition, huge<br />
production risks associated with dairy activities render animal husbandry a risky<br />
proposition for low-income households. Th e production risks can relate to a<br />
scarcity of input such as fodder or water for the animals, the high morbidity of<br />
individual animals or an epidemic (see Table 12.1). Th e tropical climate and poor<br />
hygienic conditions pertaining in many developing countries are some of the factors<br />
that trigger or aggravate diseases such as mastitis, foot and mouth disease<br />
(FMD) and haemorrhagic septicaemia.<br />
Types of risk in livestock livelihoods<br />
Production risk Price risk<br />
Death, accidental and natural Weak rural infrastructure, e.g. roads,<br />
temperature-controlled supply chain<br />
Disease:<br />
– High morbidity due to epidemics and<br />
variable risks<br />
– Stoppage of milk production due to<br />
diseases such as mastitis and FMD<br />
Problems in input supply:<br />
– Lack of dry and green fodder for animals<br />
– Lack of water during droughts causing stress<br />
Animal death is the biggest risk for poor cattle owners. Since animals often<br />
represent a major asset for a low-income household, perhaps even its most valuable<br />
asset, their death can cause a signifi cant decline in the household’s net worth,<br />
not to mention a fall in income and productive output. If the animal has been<br />
purchased through a loan, the household may have a debt on an asset it no<br />
longer owns.<br />
259<br />
Fluctuations in cost of livestock and products