MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ... MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

10.12.2012 Views

194 Life insurance be earned from other high-margin products) and the client. Confl icts of interest also arise when savings-linked insurance is sold through banks, as banks have an incentive to make clients enrol in their own savings products. SHGs may have similar confl icts, but are fundamentally interested in the welfare of their members and hence may be better suited to encouraging a long-term savings product. Box 8.1 Channel experimentation in Max Vijay Max Vijay has tested a variety of channels, using “push” and “pull” methods. Push channels are those in which intermediaries actively persuade customers to purchase the product. Th ese were used primarily to encourage the relatively high-premium initial uptake of the product. Th e push channels utilized were a fi nancial product distributor, MFIs, NGOs and government centres. Pull channels are those in which product sales points are established and cus- cus- customers are encouraged to purchase products from these points. Th ese were primarily local retailers, including “mom and pop” shops, which policyholders reg- ularly frequented and were therefore convenient locations for customers to make additional contributions to their Max Vijay policy. Experience across distribution channels has varied. Th e fi nancial product intermediary generated the majority of sales, but at the expense of other MNYL products targeted at higher-income customers. Th is channel, however, produced poor results in the area of on-going contributions. Overall, additional contributions were made in only one-sixth of the policies. Success rates were highest in the retail channels, particularly in the city of Agra, where more than half of the policies sold were credited with top-up contribu- tions by policyholders. It is clear from the experience to date that the product will provide clients with value – and probably the insurer with profi t – only if regular saving behaviour is developed and sustained, which suggests that even marginal eff orts to promote a culture of continuous saving could pay off well in terms of new sales, improved persistency and growth in savings. Sources: Adapted from Harmeling, 2010. 8.3.3 Design priorities A careful analysis of four insurers that have adopted diff erent approaches to extending savings and insurance products to low-income households provides some preliminary insights for others interested in designing similar products. Establish the key objective and focus everything on this. Microinsurance customers live complex fi nancial lives, but it is not possible for products to meet all needs. Customers need products that meet one specifi c goal. Th ey must understand what they are purchasing, particularly if the product seeks to com-

Savings in microinsurance bine elements of insurance and saving. The distribution channel, the product design and the internal infrastructure of the insurer must support this. Failure to focus on one goal compromises the clarity of the message to customers, reducing the sales potential and undermining customer loyalty to the detriment of the sustainability of the business. Prioritize distribution. Portfolio scale is crucial for insurance products that provide savings, so giving the business the best opportunity to sell large numbers of contracts is a priority. This probably means making some tough decisions early on, for example to exclude access for the general public, but these can be reviewed once a sustainable structure has been achieved. Successful insurers in this study have been single-minded in their approach to distribution. Stimulate trust and loyalty. From a number of different perspectives it seems that trust plays a significant part in the success of the insurer, whether the primary channel of product distribution is intermediated or not. Insurers, it follows, should monitor the satisfaction of customers with the product and services being received from the insurer and intermediaries. This should extend through the whole chain of contact with customers. Good client service, timely payment of claims, minimal exclusions and smooth administration service all serve to enhance the reputation of the insurer in the community that it serves. Happy customers are more likely to stay; and keeping existing customers is cheaper than replacing them with new ones. Insurers must recognize that it is not primarily about sales, but about persistency, as customers who leave early are worse than those not gained at all. Simplicity has merit. In savings products, as in microinsurance more generally, some compromise on flexibility in favour of simplicity seems to have helped in at least two of the examples considered in this chapter. It appears that, while consumers generally desire choice, they acknowledge and appreciate the benefits of longer-term contractual arrangements that impose constraints, in premium payment for example, in return for rewards. This has a considerable positive impact on the sustainability of the product and must be considered by the insurer in the context of the product’s key objectives. Simplicity enhances customer understanding which, in turn, is likely to improve loyalty and hence the financial sustainability of the portfolio. It may alienate customers with more sophisticated needs, but these can be met at a later stage through product enhancement. The reverse is not true, as it is almost impossible to simplify an existing product. 8.4 Concluding thoughts and way forward Microinsurance practitioners are paying more attention to the manner in which customers might be encouraged to combine savings with insurance. A number of insurers in India have launched products that do just this (this chapter considers 195

Savings in microinsurance<br />

bine elements of insurance and saving. The distribution channel, the product<br />

design and the internal infrastructure of the insurer must support this. Failure to<br />

focus on one goal compromises the clarity of the message to customers, reducing<br />

the sales potential and undermining customer loyalty to the detriment of the sustainability<br />

of the business.<br />

Prioritize distribution. Portfolio scale is crucial for insurance products that<br />

provide savings, so giving the business the best opportunity to sell large numbers<br />

of contracts is a priority. This probably means making some tough decisions early<br />

on, for example to exclude access for the general public, but these can be<br />

reviewed once a sustainable structure has been achieved. Successful insurers in<br />

this study have been single-minded in their approach to distribution.<br />

Stimulate trust and loyalty. From a number of different perspectives it<br />

seems that trust plays a significant part in the success of the insurer, whether the<br />

primary channel of product distribution is intermediated or not. Insurers, it follows,<br />

should monitor the satisfaction of customers with the product and services<br />

being received from the insurer and intermediaries. This should extend through<br />

the whole chain of contact with customers. Good client service, timely payment<br />

of claims, minimal exclusions and smooth administration service all serve to<br />

enhance the reputation of the insurer in the community that it serves. Happy<br />

customers are more likely to stay; and keeping existing customers is cheaper than<br />

replacing them with new ones. Insurers must recognize that it is not primarily<br />

about sales, but about persistency, as customers who leave early are worse than<br />

those not gained at all.<br />

Simplicity has merit. In savings products, as in microinsurance more generally,<br />

some compromise on flexibility in favour of simplicity seems to have helped<br />

in at least two of the examples considered in this chapter. It appears that, while<br />

consumers generally desire choice, they acknowledge and appreciate the benefits<br />

of longer-term contractual arrangements that impose constraints, in premium<br />

payment for example, in return for rewards. This has a considerable positive impact<br />

on the sustainability of the product and must be considered by the insurer in the<br />

context of the product’s key objectives. Simplicity enhances customer understanding<br />

which, in turn, is likely to improve loyalty and hence the financial sustainability<br />

of the portfolio. It may alienate customers with more sophisticated<br />

needs, but these can be met at a later stage through product enhancement. The<br />

reverse is not true, as it is almost impossible to simplify an existing product.<br />

8.4 Concluding thoughts and way forward<br />

<strong>Microinsurance</strong> practitioners are paying more attention to the manner in which<br />

customers might be encouraged to combine savings with insurance. A number of<br />

insurers in India have launched products that do just this (this chapter considers<br />

195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!