10.12.2012 Views

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

172 Health insurance<br />

7.3.5 Location of residence and WTP<br />

The discussion presented above, based on the data reported in the cited studies,<br />

leads to the assertion that WTP for health microinsurance is highly influenced<br />

by various variables, notably the economic and socio-demographic status of<br />

respondents, their financial exposure to healthcare costs and availability of<br />

healthcare facilities. All these features vary markedly by location, within and<br />

between countries. A simple comparison of results of the different studies<br />

reviewed here is impossible due to the dissimilarity in methods used to elicit<br />

WTP and to interpret the data. Specifically, the question arises as to whether the<br />

significant explanatory variables identified at the level of single households can<br />

account for the difference across locations.<br />

We submit that the way to address this question with confidence would be to<br />

include a “location variable” in multiple regressions performed to identify the<br />

explanatory variables at the level of single households when the dataset includes<br />

more than one location. Following this process could ensure that household features<br />

and WTP levels would be elicited using the same methodology. Only two<br />

of the studies reviewed have actually followed this procedure, Dror et al. (2007)<br />

(comparing seven locations in India) and Onwujekwe et al. (2010) (comparing<br />

six locations in Nigeria). Both studies reported that the location still remained a<br />

highly significant explanatory variable for the variation in WTP, even in a multivariate<br />

model including all the features of the individual households (economic<br />

and socio-demographic status and recent experience with healthcare costs). This<br />

finding suggests that the studies published so far on WTP for health microinsurance<br />

have not yet identified all of the reasons that explain differences in WTP for<br />

health insurance across communities; we cannot exclude that some features, e.g.<br />

those reflecting cultural or lifestyle choices, could explain some underlying<br />

reasons that have not been recognized. The impact of location as an explanatory<br />

variable will need to be explored more thoroughly in future research.<br />

7.4 Lessons learned and implications for practitioners<br />

“We had to work backwards taking into consideration what the community<br />

could pay, while creating a long-term, self-sustaining scheme.” This testimony of<br />

an HMI practitioner in India presents the essential role of WTP estimates,<br />

namely that members’ WTP determines the income side, and by extension also<br />

what the insurer can offer by way of cover.<br />

This review of field experiments has illustrated that all researchers agree that<br />

WTP must be explored locally, because there is no “one-size-fits-all” option to<br />

determine the income side of different HMI schemes operating in different settings.<br />

The review has also shed light on the difficulties associated with obtaining<br />

WTP estimates that would be relevant locally. Such estimates require data that is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!