10.12.2012 Views

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

166 Health insurance<br />

Th is assumption was tested further with the data from three studies<br />

reviewed. Gustafson-Wright et al. (2009) showed that WTP expressed as a<br />

percentage of consumption/expenditure was 11.4 per cent among the poorest<br />

quintile, but only 1.2 per cent among the richest quintile. Dror et al. (2007)<br />

reported that the median value of WTP as a percentage of income decreased<br />

from 1.79 per cent among the poorest quintile to 0.84 per cent among the<br />

richest quintile, and this negative correlation was signifi cant. Dong et al. (2005)<br />

provided the value of WTP for fi ve income quintiles and the average income<br />

proxy (consumption) for these quintiles, which enables us to calculate WTP<br />

relative to income/expenditure; his results show that WTP was 18.9 per cent<br />

among the poorest quintile, and only 0.9 per cent among the richest quintile.<br />

We therefore conclude that, while nominal WTP levels increase when household<br />

incomes grow, they decrease dramatically as income increases when WTP<br />

is measured as a share of income.<br />

Most studies also examined the association between WTP and other sociodemographic<br />

variables. Table 7.4 contains the summary results.<br />

Table 7.4 Association of WTP with socio-economic parameters<br />

Authors I/HH Gender Education HH size Age Insurance experience<br />

Walraven HH+I n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.<br />

Asenso-Okyere et al. HH m>f + n.d. n.s. n.s.<br />

Mathiyazhagan HH n.d. + + n.s. n.d.<br />

Masud et al. HH n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.<br />

Dong et al. HH n.s. + n.s. n.s. n.d.<br />

I m>f + n.d. – n.d.<br />

Binam et al. HH m>f n.s. n.d. n.s. n.d.<br />

Asgary et al. HH n.d. + n.s. + n.s.<br />

Asfaw and Braun HH n.s. + n.d. n.d. n.d.<br />

Bärnighausen et al. I f>m + n.d. – n.d.<br />

Ying et al. I m>f + n.d. – n.d.<br />

Dror et al. HH m>f + (>11y) +,– (PP) – +<br />

Lofgren et al. HH n.s. + n.d. – n.s.<br />

Gustafsson-Wright et al. HH m>f + n.s. – n.d.<br />

Onwujekwe et al. HH m>f + – (PP) n.s. n.d.<br />

I m>f + n.s. + +<br />

I = individual; HH = household; n.d. = not determined; n.s. = not signifi cant; PP = persons in household.<br />

As is often assumed, education is a positive explanatory variable of WTP in<br />

most cases.<br />

Th e results (shown in Table 7.4) also suggest that in most cases, males were<br />

willing to pay more than females. As for age, fi ve studies showed no signifi cant<br />

eff ect of age on WTP, and six reported a negative correlation. Th ere is no intui-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!