Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa

Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa Euradwaste '08 - EU Bookshop - Europa

bookshop.europa.eu
from bookshop.europa.eu More from this publisher
10.12.2012 Views

Michael Äbersold Switzerland is in the process of developing geological disposal and among others one of the important concerns is the idea of trans-border transparency. According to the Swiss legislation, the project, for which a political strategy is in place for the next 20 years, needs local and national acceptance by the means of referendums. In the same way the development of potential new NPPs requires to go through a referendum process. As part of the Swiss programme, the costs of disposal are anticipated by the establishment of budget procedures and social policies will be implemented for those communities which will be involved in the disposal project. Alvaro Rodríguez Beceiro The attitude of Spain with regards to geological disposal is not positive. The siting process has been interrupted in the mid 90's and so far the situation is focused on an interim storage during 50 to 60 years and geological disposal is not treated as a priority. According to the actors involved in the Spanish geological disposal project, the programme suffers from a lack of political commitment as well as a weak public acceptance. Beside, the problem is that given Spain’s public mentalities, history and other specificities, public acceptance is still a matter of future wish. Moreover, generally speaking, the nuclear industry is rather in favour of extended storage solutions than progressing in the direction of geological disposal. Spain rather considers that a national project for deep geological repository is at the moment unrealistic. Vit�zslav Duda In the Czech Republic, nuclear energy receives a favourable public acceptance and apart from the fact that a national law prohibits import of radioactive waste, some politicians would be in favour of accepting and managing foreign radioactive waste. There is no state policy on reprocessing and the decision is left to CEZ, which does not perceive it as being economically interesting. However, the question remains open. As part of the geological disposal programme, site selection is scheduled for 2015, and repository construction should start after 2050. Due to the fact that the Czech Republic is a small country with a high population density, the transfer of information on the nuclear programme is not optimized. Under the Atomic Energy Act 2002, CEZ the nuclear plants operator is required to put aside funds for waste disposal, lodging these with the Czech National Bank. Gheorghe Negut In Romania, the first unit of Cernavoda NPP has been operated since 1996, the second unit started operation in 2007. Plans exist for construction of Unit 3 and 4 in Cervanoda and a new NPP. Polls show increasing acceptance of nuclear energy and disposal as the solution for radioactive waste management. The main and major challenge in Romania with regard to waste management is the construction of a near surface facility for LLW in Saligny near Cernavoda NPP to be commissioned in 2014. According to the Government, the national strategy for geological disposal is to develop a repository to be operated in 2055, a faraway horizon. 42

With the support of IAEA preliminary siting investigations have been performed in green schists in Dobrogea, a sparsely populated area near Cernavoda. Esko Ruokola Finland was presented as a success story with regard to political commitment on geological disposal, with a decision taken in 1983. In the mid 90's with the establishment of a legislation prohibiting import and/or export of radioactive waste, export of radioactive waste to Russia was stopped, reinforcing the option to go for deep geological disposal. As confirmed by the series of Eurobarometers on nuclear safety and on radioactive waste (the last one issued in June 2008), a large majority of Finns is favourable, both at national and local levels, to nuclear energy and consider that geological disposal is a safe solution to implement for the management of their spent fuel. Moreover most Finns, who have been deeply involved in the nuclear programme early in its development, are confident in their policy makers, regulators and operators. 43

Michael Äbersold<br />

Switzerland is in the process of developing geological disposal and among others one of the important<br />

concerns is the idea of trans-border transparency. According to the Swiss legislation, the project,<br />

for which a political strategy is in place for the next 20 years, needs local and national acceptance<br />

by the means of referendums. In the same way the development of potential new NPPs requires<br />

to go through a referendum process.<br />

As part of the Swiss programme, the costs of disposal are anticipated by the establishment of budget<br />

procedures and social policies will be implemented for those communities which will be involved<br />

in the disposal project.<br />

Alvaro Rodríguez Beceiro<br />

The attitude of Spain with regards to geological disposal is not positive. The siting process has<br />

been interrupted in the mid 90's and so far the situation is focused on an interim storage during 50<br />

to 60 years and geological disposal is not treated as a priority.<br />

According to the actors involved in the Spanish geological disposal project, the programme suffers<br />

from a lack of political commitment as well as a weak public acceptance. Beside, the problem is<br />

that given Spain’s public mentalities, history and other specificities, public acceptance is still a matter<br />

of future wish.<br />

Moreover, generally speaking, the nuclear industry is rather in favour of extended storage solutions<br />

than progressing in the direction of geological disposal. Spain rather considers that a national project<br />

for deep geological repository is at the moment unrealistic.<br />

Vit�zslav Duda<br />

In the Czech Republic, nuclear energy receives a favourable public acceptance and apart from the<br />

fact that a national law prohibits import of radioactive waste, some politicians would be in favour of<br />

accepting and managing foreign radioactive waste.<br />

There is no state policy on reprocessing and the decision is left to CEZ, which does not perceive it<br />

as being economically interesting. However, the question remains open.<br />

As part of the geological disposal programme, site selection is scheduled for 2015, and repository<br />

construction should start after 2050.<br />

Due to the fact that the Czech Republic is a small country with a high population density, the transfer<br />

of information on the nuclear programme is not optimized.<br />

Under the Atomic Energy Act 2002, CEZ the nuclear plants operator is required to put aside funds<br />

for waste disposal, lodging these with the Czech National Bank.<br />

Gheorghe Negut<br />

In Romania, the first unit of Cernavoda NPP has been operated since 1996, the second unit started<br />

operation in 2007. Plans exist for construction of Unit 3 and 4 in Cervanoda and a new NPP.<br />

Polls show increasing acceptance of nuclear energy and disposal as the solution for radioactive<br />

waste management.<br />

The main and major challenge in Romania with regard to waste management is the construction of<br />

a near surface facility for LLW in Saligny near Cernavoda NPP to be commissioned in 2014.<br />

According to the Government, the national strategy for geological disposal is to develop a repository<br />

to be operated in 2055, a faraway horizon.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!